The fact that you think that those are "anti-Christian" laws reveals your real position quite clearly.
No I am saying that these Christian values and beliefs were once in secular society, the public space and society removed them which is what a secular State should do. So Christianity has no power anymore to dictate secular norms.
Now the State dictates the values and beliefs on these matters. The State is now taken the role of the arbitor of what beliefs and values society should have. But that is a religion in itself because the determination of what consitutues the right ideology in how individuals, families, institutions and society as a whole should be ordered is a metaphysical belief itself. Its not based on facts or reality.
Christians (Fundamentalist Evangelical Protestants, that is) constitute, last I looked, about 25% of the electorate and represent a solid and unified voting bloc, which is an extremely powerful thing in electoral politics. They take strong positions on the following policies, advancing biblical arguments in support of them.
Abortion--opposed
Birth control--opposed
Toleration of LGBTs--opposed
Gun control--opposed
AGW and steps to counter it--opposed
Single-payer health care--opposed
Granting asylum to illegal aliens--opposed
Prayer and Bible study in the public schools--in favor, but only Evangelical Protestant prayer and Bible study to be allowed.
Ok well that sounds like the many other extreme groups like Extinction rebellion, Greenpeace, BLM, ANTIFA, all the Marxist groups trying to force socialism, the Woke brigade, Cancel Culture and DEI ideologues. Society is made up of many political and ideological groups all vying for space and to control the narrative and society.
But what is interesting and a concern is that everyone has become more polarised and not just these "Fundamentalist Evangelical Protestants". The Left will have their versions of extreme ideology. We already see it in operation within society and how divisive it is.
The thing is people are now demonising opposing groups because they are making it all about groups, identity. You just identified what you believe is a negative identity which makes up 25% of voters. So your demonising a quarter of all people. Thats not a good way to create a society that gets along by calling anyone who has a different and perhaps valid view at least in some ways bad or evil.
I mean most of that list you make is not necessarily an extreme position to take. Maybe completely outlawing everything is unreal but most people agree in minimizing Abortion, unnecessary abortions. Or reducing gun related deaths through some sort of gun control.
I don't think they are against the LGBTIQ+ community but rather having some unreal ideology thrust upon them . Most say that a person can identify however they want but they should not and society should not impose something on people they don't believe in or think is reality. What some Woke ideologues are doing is wanting to impose their ideology onto everyone.
But that is exacty the same thing people are accusing the (Fundamentalist Evangelicals of doing. Forcing their religion onto others.
I don't think most people are against birth control. Its more about responsible birth control to stop the rise of broken families, fatherless kids. These are nobel reasons. You act like there is no rational basis to these concerns.
I mean look at the out of control situation with immigration, refugees and asylum seekers. Due to lax policies we now have worldwide crisis on our hands where civil unreal is occurring across most western nations. Tens of thousands of people crossing borders without any controls and where radicals are coming in and bringing their chaos now undermining society.
The Scandinavian nations who had the most generous immigration polcies are now a hotbed of terrorism and gand violence. These were once the most peaceful and human societies.
What I find ironic is that you dismiss these Christian groups perse as though 25% of the people are full of rubbish when there may be some truth to the issues they highlight. Sure some go overboard but that doesn't mean these issues need addressing and that current policy or beliefs about how we should deal with this is correct.
It may be that the current beliefs and policies about open boarders, free range of abortion, the pill, gund ect is exactly what is the problem. At the very least both sides concerns should be legitimate and able to be expressed if we are to tolerate all views and beliefs.