• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Is it true that the scientists discovered parallel worlds, and who lives in them?

Larniavc

"Encourage him to keep talking. He's hilarious."
Jul 14, 2015
14,760
9,023
52
✟385,217.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
Today the people are not complete, they are divided. They have replaced the call of the heart, the emotions with the mental reasoning. You just hate me, so you do say these mean things?
Disagreement with you is not hate.
 
Reactions: Strathos
Upvote 0

joinfree

Well-Known Member
Nov 3, 2016
1,009
191
88
EU
✟36,708.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
No.

[/thread].
So, there are no particular problems with the article, you just hate all thing together? But is the hatred spread the same level through the text, or some parts of the text is less hateable? What are these parts? My top CV perhaps?
 
Upvote 0

Strathos

No one important
Dec 11, 2012
12,663
6,532
God's Earth
✟270,796.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
So, there are no particular problems with the article, you just hate all thing together? But is the hatred spread the same level through the text, or some parts of the text is less hateable? What are these parts? My top CV perhaps?

The question asked in your thread title. That's the answer.
 
Upvote 0

joinfree

Well-Known Member
Nov 3, 2016
1,009
191
88
EU
✟36,708.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
The question asked in your thread title. That's the answer.
What about the text of the article? The text of the article proves the title of it. Learn this way in scientific journals. What is wrong about my text? Today the people are not complete, they are divided. They have replaced the call of the heart, the emotions with the mental reasoning, and vice versa. And they do troll the promising authors without noticing the own troll's hate speech. You just hate me, so you do say these mean things? So, there are no particular problems with the article, you just hate all thing together? But is the hatred spread the same level through the text, or some parts of the text is less hateable? What are these parts? My top CV perhaps?
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

joinfree

Well-Known Member
Nov 3, 2016
1,009
191
88
EU
✟36,708.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
 
Upvote 0

Larniavc

"Encourage him to keep talking. He's hilarious."
Jul 14, 2015
14,760
9,023
52
✟385,217.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
Tell us the subject of disagreement.
That travelling to another universe is impossible.

You said so, yourself. I’m surprised you have forgotten.
 
Upvote 0

joinfree

Well-Known Member
Nov 3, 2016
1,009
191
88
EU
✟36,708.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
That travelling to another universe is impossible.

You said so, yourself. I’m surprised you have forgotten.
There can I buy a ticket? Nowhere, right? But the scientific proof is in the text:
 
Upvote 0

FrumiousBandersnatch

Well-Known Member
Mar 20, 2009
15,405
8,144
✟349,292.00
Faith
Atheist
This isn't the case. There is a variety of hypothesised multiverse types and, as far as I'm aware, all of them are theoretical predictions or extrapolations based on currently successful empirical physical models. Most of them were proposed well before the appearance of fine-tuning became a hot topic (assuming that's what you meant by your last sentence), and some are simply irrelevant to it.

As to the idea that it's impossible that our universe happened by chance, that's unsupported speculation; it may or may not be the case. It's not a scientific position, and consequently few scientists, if any, would hold to it - so from the physicist's viewpoint there's no impossibility to 'get around', but simply observations to explain, and certain kinds of multiverse do provide potential explanations.
 
Reactions: Tom 1
Upvote 0

Tom 1

Optimistic sceptic
Site Supporter
Nov 13, 2017
12,212
12,468
Tarnaveni
✟841,659.00
Country
Romania
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married

Haha yeah I need to rethink. That was based on a documentary I watched quite a while ago. Not sure, the documentary consisted of interviews with a number of well known scientists, mostly physicists, well known in the UK in any case. The general thrust of the program was that physics had led to a point where many working in the field were finding it increasingly difficult to avoid the idea of a creator behind it all, and the parallel worlds theory seemed like a way out. I suppose things have changed since then.
 
Reactions: joinfree
Upvote 0

FrumiousBandersnatch

Well-Known Member
Mar 20, 2009
15,405
8,144
✟349,292.00
Faith
Atheist
I reckon a documentary maker would have to pick their physicists pretty carefully to give that impression - or use plenty of selective quoting... but sadly that's what a lot of documentary makers do for channels like Discovery, etc. He who pays the piper calls the tune...
 
Upvote 0

yeshuaslavejeff

simple truth, martyr, disciple of Yahshua
Jan 6, 2005
39,946
11,096
okie
✟222,536.00
Faith
Anabaptist
That's RIGHT ! Dwell on this a while, think about what Yahweh thinks of all that happening...... it just might work out....
 
Reactions: joinfree
Upvote 0

Larniavc

"Encourage him to keep talking. He's hilarious."
Jul 14, 2015
14,760
9,023
52
✟385,217.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
There can I buy a ticket? Nowhere, right? But the scientific proof is in the text:
You appear to be confused.

I never said that you could.
 
Upvote 0