• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Is it possible to practice both Buddhism and Christianity?

smaneck

Baha'i
Sep 29, 2010
21,182
2,948
Jackson, MS
✟63,144.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Baha'i
Marital Status
Single
The Pharisees said they didn't need a new religion either, that they had the Torah and that was enough.

I happened to have studied Deutero-Isaiah with a Rabbi. Most of the students in the class were Christians and time and again the Rabbi made the point that redemption for the author of this text was not an individual thing. At one point it came to his attention that I was a Baha'i. He told me he had once met a Baha'i in Nevada who asked him whey he didn't except the Baha'i Faith. "I told him that Moses was enough for me." I said nothing at the time because I was a bit embarrassed that a Baha'i had been so aggressive about trying to convert this guy. But towards the end of the course, my religion somehow came up again, and again the Rabbi said, "Moses is enough for me." So this time I answered him, "All semester long you have been pressing the point that salvation is not an individual matter, so the question I have to ask you is this, "Is Moses enough for the world?""
 
Upvote 0

smaneck

Baha'i
Sep 29, 2010
21,182
2,948
Jackson, MS
✟63,144.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Baha'i
Marital Status
Single
I'm not sure what the relevance of this post is here unless you are equating me with unbelief for some reason. I think a wide scope of people believed in Jesus from the lowest to a (very few) high priests. I think however that too many of the priesthood had false pride in their works of the Law to see humility in the simple idea Jesus himself presented.

It does indeed have to do with pride, but not simply pride in 'works of the law.' The leaders of every past religion are the first to reject the next revelation. Having contained revelation, having mastered it and placed it under our control, having squeezed it neatly into their categories, the last thing they want is to having it burst forth unpredictably once again. Thus the pattern repeats itself again and again.

As the Qur'an says: "And Joseph came to you aforetime with clear tokens, but ye ceased not to doubt of the message with which He came to you, until, when He died, ye said, 'God will be no means raise up a Messenger after Him." ( 40:36).

But then of course, Muslims then turned around and did the same exact thing. Humility ultimately is acknowledging, in the deepest way, our continuing need for God and that means being ever ready to receive His revelation. Pride sets in when the need to be right takes precedence over determining the truth. Baha'u'llah notes that leaders of religion did not simply lack knowledge and understanding, they were unwilling to seek it out if it would upset their presuppositions. Control and pride are typically to be found together. As often as not, the kind of education encouraged among the Pharisees, as later tended to predominate within Christendom, as well as among the 'ulama of Islam was aimed, not at the investigation and discovery of truth, but rather the mastery of a certain predetermined body of knowledge. Among the Shi'ites, for instance, on becoming a mujtahid one was given a diploma (ijazeh) which stipulated precisely what books one had read. Innovation, far from being something encouraged, was a byword for heresy. For this reason the religious leaders in every age insisted that the Promised One Who comes "must needs promulgate and fulfil" the laws of the previous dispensation. (KI p. 18.) But the Promised One who comes is never the One expected and Revelation overturns all of our preconceived categories.
 
Upvote 0

smaneck

Baha'i
Sep 29, 2010
21,182
2,948
Jackson, MS
✟63,144.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Baha'i
Marital Status
Single
It isn't agreeing with Jesus regarding generic believing that matters but of specifically believing in HIM ALONE

Not something that Jesus stressed.

that matters something that the Bahai faith doesn't accept but instead they allow other gods in the midst

Sorry, we are monotheists. There is only one God.
 
Upvote 0

LoAmmi

Dispassionate
Mar 12, 2012
26,944
9,715
✟217,033.00
Faith
Judaism
Marital Status
Married
It does indeed have to do with pride, but not simply pride in 'works of the law.'

Knowing the sayings and such that came out of that period of time, I have trouble believing the leading Pharisee sages were that prideful or that opposed to learning new things. That's the spin of the New Testament at work.
 
Upvote 0

smaneck

Baha'i
Sep 29, 2010
21,182
2,948
Jackson, MS
✟63,144.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Baha'i
Marital Status
Single
Buddha, in the Nikaya suttas, does acknowledge the existence of gods. However, these "gods" are not all-powerful creator gods in the sense which Christianity sees YHVH.

My understanding is that they reject a creator god period, whether all-powerful or not. One of their arguments goes that if a god created the universe he must have been mighty cruel. As for lesser gods, if they exist at all they are of no help to you because they too are subject to change and have no permanent being.
 
Upvote 0

smaneck

Baha'i
Sep 29, 2010
21,182
2,948
Jackson, MS
✟63,144.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Baha'i
Marital Status
Single
Knowing the sayings and such that came out of that period of time, I have trouble believing the leading Pharisee sages were that prideful or that opposed to learning new things. That's the spin of the New Testament at work.

The earliest gospel, which is the Gospel of Mark the 'scribes' appear to be Jesus main opponents. By the time we get to Matthew the Pharisees appear to be the villains and then finally the 'Jews' generically in John's gospel. I think what this likely represents the growing tension between Christians and Jews in the synagogue networks of the Hellenistic world.

Acts of the Apostles presents Gamaliel, who I understand to be the leading Pharisee of the time as at least not hostile towards Christians.
 
Upvote 0

LoAmmi

Dispassionate
Mar 12, 2012
26,944
9,715
✟217,033.00
Faith
Judaism
Marital Status
Married
The earliest gospel, which is the Gospel of Mark the 'scribes' appear to be Jesus main opponents. By the time we get to Matthew the Pharisees appear to be the villains and then finally the 'Jews' generically in John's gospel. I think what this likely represents the growing tension between Christians and Jews in the synagogue networks of the Hellenistic world.

Of course, I think all the Gospels are written in a deliberate effort to shift the blame for Jesus' death from the Romans, who the Christians were desperate to convert, to the Jews who were rivals.
Acts of the Apostles presents Gamaliel, who I understand to be the leading Pharisee of the time as at least not hostile towards Christians.

Yeah. I've actually heard the claim that he became a Christian at some point which would go directly against what we know of him. But everybody who is any bit good in the stories becomes Christian in the lore, even Pilate is claimed to have converted. I suppose this was after he was recalled to Rome for being too brutal.
 
Upvote 0

ananda

Early Buddhist
May 6, 2011
14,757
2,123
Soujourner on Earth
✟193,871.00
Marital Status
Private
My understanding is that they reject a creator god period, whether all-powerful or not. One of their arguments goes that if a god created the universe he must have been mighty cruel. As for lesser gods, if they exist at all they are of no help to you because they too are subject to change and have no permanent being.
The Buddhist devas/gods of the fifth through ninth lokas (heavenly realms) above the human realm are said to be creator gods. Then there are additional lokas even above those, in which even more superior gods exist, ones who do not engage in creation. They are all said to have power of varying degrees, and are thus worshipped for their temporal blessings.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

LoAmmi

Dispassionate
Mar 12, 2012
26,944
9,715
✟217,033.00
Faith
Judaism
Marital Status
Married
I happened to have studied Deutero-Isaiah with a Rabbi. Most of the students in the class were Christians and time and again the Rabbi made the point that redemption for the author of this text was not an individual thing. At one point it came to his attention that I was a Baha'i. He told me he had once met a Baha'i in Nevada who asked him whey he didn't except the Baha'i Faith. "I told him that Moses was enough for me." I said nothing at the time because I was a bit embarrassed that a Baha'i had been so aggressive about trying to convert this guy. But towards the end of the course, my religion somehow came up again, and again the Rabbi said, "Moses is enough for me." So this time I answered him, "All semester long you have been pressing the point that salvation is not an individual matter, so the question I have to ask you is this, "Is Moses enough for the world?""

What was his answer?
 
Upvote 0

LoAmmi

Dispassionate
Mar 12, 2012
26,944
9,715
✟217,033.00
Faith
Judaism
Marital Status
Married
I think there is more than one opinion in Judaism.

Wouldn't be Jews if there weren't. ;)

All the opinions I've ever seen (discounting ones that are basically "nothing will happen!" which isn't really Judaism) are basically the same but with slightly different shades.
 
Upvote 0