Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
God has always existed. He can not change. Because He is unchangeable, He can not go into or out of existence. This is His nature. And this means how His love can not break down, in spite of all the evil. His love can not get tired or worn out, and this in us makes us more and more truly stable in character . . . not depending only, merely on self-control and self-discipline and methods and managing our circumstances in order to have peace and rest.
Did God exist from infinite time in the past?
Answer No, as there has not been an infinite of time in the past.
The question shows poor understanding of who and what God is.
God created time, spave, energy and matter.
Therefore God is not afected by his creation, time.
In a personal form, yes. Jesus grew in grace and truth while on this earth. I consider that though God knows all, each of His Persons can specialize in what each Person actively and consciously knows.can God learn?
As Jesus grows in us (Galatians 4:19), we in union with Him become more and more creativeCan God get a little bit better at creating?
God can already know everything, but how much his family and friends become able to share with Him is what grows. This could be the case, in your example below >Can God get to know his family and friends better over......... time?
Knowing can mean what you are aware of and it can mean acknowledging, recognizing with someone else what you already knew by yourself. I think this means the LORD was recognizing and acknowledging in relationship and sharing with Abraham . . . though He already knew the outcome before the test.Gen 22:12
And he said, Lay not thine hand upon the lad, neither do thou any thing unto him: for now I know that thou fearest God, seeing thou hast not withheld thy son, thine only sonfrom me.
All of creation was made for God and look at the lavishness with which God has created.But.... can God rejoice in His creation?
Can God have fun........ creating?
If God is having fun...... isn't God being affected by his creation?
In a personal form, yes. Jesus grew in grace and truth while on this earth. I consider that though God knows all, each of His Persons can specialize in what each Person actively and consciously knows.
As Jesus grows in us (Galatians 4:19), we in union with Him become more and more creativeas He grows in us. But God by nature is always fully and perfectly creative; but what He is doing in us can grow.
God can already know everything, but how much his family and friends become able to share with Him is what grows. This could be the case, in your example below >
Knowing can mean what you are aware of and it can mean acknowledging, recognizing with someone else what you already knew by yourself. I think this means the LORD was recognizing and acknowledging in relationship and sharing with Abraham . . . though He already knew the outcome before the test.
Also, possibly God in Abraham was changing Abraham to become so obedient, even in the process of the test. So, God could not know, in the present that Abraham really put God first, until God in Abraham changed him to become so, right during the test. And only then could the LORD know, in the present tense< only after God had matured Abraham to become so. But He knew ahead of time what would happen.
Maybe we could say the LORD knew, intellectually, even before Abraham obeyed Him. But . . . also . . . then He knew in personal sharing with Abraham. So, the knowing became relational and personal, once Abraham obeyed and knew that the LORD knew.
By the way, we have >
"for it is God who works in you both to will and to do for His good pleasure." (Philippians 2:13)
So, I understand that God was in Abraham working him to so obey. And then God said He knew Abraham put God first. God does have us being and living as individual persons, with personal communication with God, though it is God in and through it all
Did God exist from infinite time in the past?
If so.... what was God doing?
if God..........
actually planned, engineered and choreographed an essentially infinite
number of Big Bang type events......(they might actually might have been more
like a Big Flash though)...... .then.....
.then..... investing infinite time in the past in the
creation........ could make the creation infinitely valuable to God.......
but we humans are so young...... that we place relatively low value on our
lives and even less value on the lives of others...... and even less value than that
on the lives of animals, birds, fish and plants.
Did God exist from infinite time in the past?
If so.... what was God doing?
There is a saying that "It's the economy s.....!" This question actually
has a relationship with the economy and money because...... .if.....
God existed from eternity in the past and if God..........
actually planned, engineered and choreographed an essentially infinite
number of Big Bang type events......(they might actually might have been more
like a Big Flash though)...... .then..... investing infinite time in the past in the
creation........ could make the creation infinitely valuable to God.......
but we humans are so young...... that we place relatively low value on our
lives and even less value on the lives of others...... and even less value than that
on the lives of animals, birds, fish and plants.
"These things have I spoken unto you in proverbs: but the time cometh, when I shall no more speak unto you in proverbs, but I shall shew you plainly of the Father."
As of today, October 16, 2017, the best theory that I have as to a possible fulfillment of this promise...... to in the future...... speak plainly of the Father...... is near death experience accounts where somebody meets with Messiah Yeshua - Jesus and reviews their lives.
It is in Christ himself that the Father is revealed, not near-death experiences.
Next, they wanted to talk about my life. To my surprise my life played out before me, maybe six or eight feet in front of me, from beginning to end.
The life review was very much in their control, and they showed me my life, but not from my point of view. I saw me in my life and this whole thing was a lesson, even though I didn't know it at the time. They were trying to teach me something, but I didn't know it was a teaching experience, because I didn't know that I would be coming back. We just watched my life from beginning to the end. Some things they slowed down on, and zoomed in on and other things they went right through.
My life was shown in a way that I had never thought of before. All of the things that I had worked to achieve, the recognition that I had worked for, in elementary school, in high school, in college, and in my career, they meant nothing in this setting.
I could feel their feelings of sorrow and suffering, or joy, as my life's review unfolded. They didn't say that something was bad or good, but I could feel it. And I could sense all those things they were indifferent to. They didn't, for example, look down on my high school shot-put record. They just didn't feel anything towards it, nor towards other things which I had taken so much pride in.
What they responded to was how I had interacted with other people. That was the long and short of it. Unfortunately, most of my interactions with other people didn't measure up with how I should have interacted, which was in a loving way. Whenever I did react during my life in a loving way they rejoiced.
Most of the time I found that my interactions with other people had been manipulative. During my professional career, for example, I saw myself sitting in my office, playing the college professor, while a student came to me with a personal problem. I sat there looking compassionate, and patient, and loving, while inside I was bored to death. I would check my watch under my desk as I anxiously waited for the student to finish.
......
Science tells us that time, space, matter and energy all came in to being at the Big Bang. There was no time prior to this moment. So, God did not exist in a state ordered by time before He made the universe. In fact, it is incoherent to use the word "before" to refer to when God existed prior to the Big Bang. There was no "before" since time did not exist.
What was God doing in this timeless state? The Bible doesn't really go into much detail in answer to this question.
There is no concrete evidence that any of your speculation here is warranted or possible. If the standard Big Bang model is correct, then God was not doing what you imagine here.
This is a non sequitur. God's investment in Creation does not necessarily make it valuable to Him. Scripture says God will burn up the heaven and earth and make new ones. This doesn't sound to me like God thinks His Creation is "infinitely valuable." I would urge you to do some reading on God's aseity. God is utterly complete in Himself. He needs nothing. The Creation does not add to His perfection. Perfection cannot be added to.
Nothing in God's word suggests we should think of Creation as inifinitely valuable.
What God was doing only God knows; but in my opinion Time is a dimension that may not exist in heaven; since eternity has no beginning; and God has made us with no end. Time is a necessity here while in these temples.
Science tells us that time, space, matter and energy all came in to being at the Big Bang. There was no time prior to this moment. So, God did not exist in a state ordered by time before He made the universe. In fact, it is incoherent to use the word "before" to refer to when God existed prior to the Big Bang. There was no "before" since time did not exist.
What was God doing in this timeless state? The Bible doesn't really go into much detail in answer to this question.
There is no concrete evidence that any of your speculation here is warranted or possible. If the standard Big Bang model is correct, then God was not doing what you imagine here.
This is a non sequitur. God's investment in Creation does not necessarily make it valuable to Him. Scripture says God will burn up the heaven and earth and make new ones. This doesn't sound to me like God thinks His Creation is "infinitely valuable." I would urge you to do some reading on God's aseity. God is utterly complete in Himself. He needs nothing. The Creation does not add to His perfection. Perfection cannot be added to.
Nothing in God's word suggests we should think of Creation as inifinitely valuable.
Then this presents us with a question.......
was the being of light who reviewed the life of former Atheist Howard Storm.......
Satan appearing as an angel of light........ or
Messiah Yeshua - Jesus in his glorious immortal body, keeping his promise:
But... chapter 13 of Stephen Hawking's Universe entitled The Anthropic Principle elaborates on
an Atheistic variation on the Cyclic Model of the Universe that postulates an infinite number of Big Bang events going back essentially into infinite time in the past.
I glanced at it. It seems to have too much emphasis on Christians, because of living in love, having power to control things and call for judgments.One author claims to have a visionary dream in which he met the Patriarch Adam......
If...... my theory is valid that Messiah Yeshua - Jesus the incarnated Word / Logos
views the creation as being of much greater value than we do..........
then over time our valuation of the creation should increase and increase and increase.
"Nothing in God's word suggests we should think of Creation as inifinitely valuable."If...... my theory is valid that Messiah Yeshua - Jesus the incarnated Word / Logos
views the creation as being of much greater value than we do..........
then over time our valuation of the creation should increase and increase and increase.
Phl 2:5
Let this mind be in you, which was also in Christ Jesus:
This is a false dichotomy. There is another possible option: Howard could have imagined the entire thing. His experience sounds very...cliched, to me. In any case, we have no good grounds that I can see to think Howard's NDE should be taken with any great seriousness.
For which postulation there is only ultimately speculation. Hawking wants to avoid the idea of a Designer or God-Creator, and his cyclical model of the universe enables him to do so. But there is no concrete evidence that his model is what is actually the case.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?