Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
didn't say it was a guess .... and the beat goes on ;o)
Is science always right with their interpretations?
Do you mind sharing the extent of your formal
education in the sciences?
You seem to be speaking as from a very lofty height
I routinely question people whose education in a topic are superior to mine. However, that questioning it not in the sense you seem imply. I might say "What was the specific background to changing the name inert gas to noble gas?" I wouldn't say "Why did you guys stop calling them inert gases and change it to noble gases? That was unnecessary."Are people without higher education not allowed to question those with formal education?
When those "interpretations" are found to be incorrect you know what corrects them? Science. We find out new things or invent new instruments that tell us more and we learn more. You know what has never, ever in all the time humans have been alive corrected science? Religious belief.didn't say it was a guess .... and the beat goes on ;o)
Is science always right with their interpretations?
Is science always right with their interpretations?
Avoiding a question isn't an answer.
Not everything that is knowable can be known, the science community are diverse in their theories about many things (sometimes they agree, sometimes not) and same in the faith community.
Science is important .... amazing of the discovery of complexities involved ... how did all these complexities come into being? We will never know.
Are people without higher education not allowed to question those with formal education?
Who is "lofty" .... those with formal education or those without?
I hope they had a good answer that you can relay cuz I still call them inert gasses and never understood the change.I routinely question people whose education in a topic are superior to mine. However, that questioning it not in the sense you seem imply. I might say "What was the specific background to changing the name inert gas to noble gas?" I wouldn't say "Why did you guys stop calling them inert gases and change it to noble gases? That was unnecessary."
Perhaps I've misunderstood what you mean, so please correct me if I have done so.
I hope they had a good answer that you can relay cuz I still call them inert gasses and never understood the change.
Well, I couldn't actually think of an example, so I used a hypothetical one that I know (or certainly think I know). The inert gases are not inert. They do, under special conditions, form compounds. This was not thought to be the case when they were called inert. The noble appellation suggests they are a bit snooty and don't mix with just any element at the drop of an electron.I hope they had a good answer that you can relay cuz I still call them inert gasses and never understood the change.
Fun Fact"Nobel" has that wonderful Victorian majesty to it.
And Argon is apparently from the Greek for lazy. Just more proof that scientists can't make up their minds.Well, I couldn't actually think of an example, so I used a hypothetical one that I know (or certainly think I know). The inert gases are not inert. They do, under special conditions, form compounds. This was not thought to be the case when they were called inert. The noble appellation suggests they are a bit snooty and don't mix with just any element at the drop of an electron.
Music?You know what has never, ever in all the time humans have been alive corrected science?
You are a lot more polite than I am.I routinely question people whose education in a topic are superior to mine. However, that questioning it not in the sense you seem imply. I might say "What was the specific background to changing the name inert gas to noble gas?" I wouldn't say "Why did you guys stop calling them inert gases and change it to noble gases? That was unnecessary."
Perhaps I've misunderstood what you mean, so please correct me if I have done so.
An equally vacuous response.Music?
Got it.The science of sound reminds us to stop, listen, and feel the vibration.
Which is why I tried to refer Isiaiah to you. but apparently this video is even to bad for an intelligent Christian to deal with. There are a lot more Christian scientists out there, and their discoveries were in fact the reason that the arguments presented in your video are dismissed.All the negative replies in this thread come from atheists, skeptics etc. That doesnt surprise me at all.
I believe in God's word. I also believe that God gave us science. It was superb to see Christian scientists in the documentary praising God and also lining up Biblical history with scientific facts.
I'm British. You have to read the sub-sub-text.
All the negative replies in this thread come from atheists, skeptics etc. That doesnt surprise me at all.
I believe in God's word. I also believe that God gave us science. It was superb to see Christian scientists in the documentary praising God and also lining up Biblical history with scientific facts.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?