Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Of course, but these women are not themselves Masons nor are they female versions of Masons. It is a support organization.Are you not aware that the Order of the Eastern Star is for the wives of Masons? It is the female counter-part, though men can also join.
Of course, but these women are not themselves Masons nor are they female versions of Masons. If the upside down star were the Masonic emblem or symbol with all the sinister importance that it is supposed to conveys, one would think (wouldn't we?) that it would be in use among THEM--the Masons? It isn't.
It was a Masonic Lodge, not Eastern Star that we went to.
He may have briefly been a Mason, but not a member of the Order of the Eastern Star. It is generally agreed that he borrowed from (without permission) various of the Masonic ways and looks, the apron, etc. when he was inventing his new religion. Many other outfits have done the same, such as the Odd Fellows, the Knights of Columbus, and even a few Christian churches. That has been done strictly without the approval of the Masonic organizations.And Joseph Smith was said to be a Mason. I've never heard of him being attached to the Eastern Star.
Yes, the Eastern Star uses the same building as the Masonic Lodges and other groups. Consequently, it is usual for all of them to have their own emblems on the premises somewhere or other. That doesn't mean that this emblem is the emblem of all of them just because it is there.
He may have briefly been a Mason, but of course he could not have been a member of the Order of the Eastern Star. It is generally agreed that he borrowed from (without permission) various of the Masonic ways and looks, the apron, etc. when he was inventing his new religion. Many other outfits have done the same, such as the Odd Fellows, the Knights of Columbus, and even a few Christian churches. That has been done strictly without the approval of the Masonic organizations.
What Christian denominations use aspects of Masonry and what exactly?
That's quite a story that would take some doing to explain completely. Look up the history of the Church of the Living God if you are interested in exploring the subject further.
I may be missing your point there, but I cannot really say that I know any Masons who are afraid to mention their membership or who consider themselves to be stigmatized because of the silly conspiracy theories that excite some people, no.
Oh, you are talking about England. I have no direct knowledge of how British Masons might be thinking about this.
That's right. Sort of. You cannot deliver a sermon in the basic lodge like a Christian minister would do in church. Most American Masons are Christian, however, and there is no secret about that. In addition, there are branches of Masonry which are Christian and one that is open only to Christians.One rule of the free masons is you can't preach Christ as the only way to heaven that's enough to condemn them.
That's right. Sort of. You cannot deliver a sermon in the basic lodge like a Christian minister would do in church. Most American Masons are Christian, however, and there is no secret about that. In addition, there are branches of Masonry which are Christian and one that is open only to Christians.
I of course don't mean standing in front of the lodge and preaching like in front of a congregation. But if you can't share the truth about Christ than why join.
A Christian only lodge doesn't make much sense either, they should be openly helping the community and spreading the Gospel within the church, which goes by biblical guidelines, instead of the rules of secret club.
None of those are substitutes for church.Because it isn't a substitute for ones church! The same as joining the yacht club, boy scouts, bowling league, or Chamber of Commerce.
I'll bet that you have activities you engage in with other people in which giving orations about the Bible or your love of Christ are not the purpose for getting together.
Well, that is a personal opinion, but it is not a reason to accuse Masons of being Satanic, etc.
To me, doing that is to bear false witness, which one of the Ten Commandments speaks about.
Neither is Masonry a substitute for church, so that's all there is to this.None of those are substitutes for church.
Masonry absolutely does not do that.I honestly don't, I would never join any group that denies the exclusivity of Christ as the one and only Lord and Saviour.
That was my point exactly.Bearing false witness is intentionally lying against someone.
Are you under the impression that Satan is worshipped or acclaimed...or just that any variety of Christianity not your own must, by definition, be the work of Satan? If it is the latter, most Christian churches are Satanic, right?There's good reason to accuse them of being satanic.
Whoa! THERE IS NO MOCK BURIAL OF CHRIST!Like thier mock burrial and resurrection of Christ, the Hiram Abiff thing.
No there is no such position taken. You have misunderstood. The position is--because Masonry is not a religion--that the faith of one member and that of the next member faith is their own business.One requirement for joining is a belief in a god, weither it be the god of Islam, Buddhism, or even Lucifer, they equate them all to be valid. That's according to numerous pamphlets from them.
No.And do they not believe salvation comes through understanding symbols and good works?
That's what I'm doing.If I'm wrong on this things than go ahead and correct me
Neither is Masonry, so there is nothing more to this line of thought.
Masonry absolutely does not do that.
That was my point exactly.
Are you under the impression that Satan is worshipped or acclaimed...or just that any variety of Christianity not your own must, by definition, be the work of Satan? If it is the latter, most Christian churches are Satanic, right?
Whoa! THERE IS NO MOCK BURIAL OF CHRIST!
No there is no such position taken. You have misunderstood. The position is--because Masonry is not a religion--that the faith of one member and that of the next member faith is their own business.
There is no teaching or position taken that all faiths are equally true or good or equally valid. That was originally a position trumped-up by the Vatican in order to undercut Masonry because it supported democracy, free elections, and national independence. The Pope used to be able to make and break kings and governments, you know.
No.
That's what I'm doing.
Seriously, I much appreciate it when it is possible to give and take, hearing what the other person has picked up from somewhere or other, and him being willing to consider what is explained in reply.
This is a good example of how people get things turned around. What I said was:Just a minute ago you called free masonry, the boy scouts, the yacht club, and the chamber of commerce substitute for church.
I was saying that--LIKE those other organizations--it is NOT a substitute for church.Because it isn't a substitute for ones church! The same as joining the yacht club, boy scouts, bowling league, or Chamber of Commerce.
Quite right!Free masonry isn't a variety of Christianity.
The great majority of Masons in this country do. So you are wrong about that.Either they accept Christ exclusively or they dont, and they don't.
It is a drama that concerns a mythical stonemason who supposedly was involved with the building of King Solomons temple. He came long before the time of Christ.What is the death and resurrection ritual of Hiram Abiff?
I think I amended that reply in order to elaborate on it somewhat more, but if you have a follow-up question, do ask it.Simply saying "no they don't" isn't much of an argument.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?