stinsonmarri
Regular Member
- Dec 3, 2010
- 885
- 10
- 74
- Faith
- SDA
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- US-Democrat
NO! NO! NO!
Ellen White herself did not feel her authority was in biblical interpretation. She saw her role as directing/encouraging people back to honest bible study and to relationship with Jesus. She did study the Bible a lot and therefore had some helpful insights at times, but she never saw herself, nor should she be held as a final interpreter of Scripture. Scripture should be interpreted using the context and references and interpretations given in the text itself or in its cultural/historical context.
Ellen White herself did not feel her authority was in biblical interpretation. She saw her role as directing/ encouraging people back to honest bible study and to relationship with Jesus. She did study the Bible a lot and therefore had some helpful insights at times, but she never saw herself, nor should she be held as a final interpreter of Scripture. Scripture should be interpreted using the context and references and interpretations given in the text itself or in its cultural/historical context.[/QUOTE]
Beloved you are the closest to the truth except on one point, interpretation. The Bible it said:
Knowing this first, that no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation. 2Pe 1:20
What EGW saw or was shown by ELOHIM you can find it in the Bible. What we forget is that knowledge was starting to increase. But the sciences were in there infancy, including Biblical history. EGW also said the she saw words that had been changed in the Bible by the then known Biblical scholars. The Protestant churches did not truly move away from the Catholic Church as did the Adventist. They mainly view the same Greek paganistic ideology including the state government. Hellenistic views and belief became the major thought exactly as Daniel Seven showed and then Revelation continued in Chapter Thirteen. The Adventist Church also was in its infancy as well. These members were studying but they also brought in with them beliefs they still had from their churches they left. Even the Book on Daniel and Revelation was still using history and beliefs that most Protestants believed during that time.
The Adventist stood firm on the Sabbath, the Investigated Judgment and most of them were against the trinity. They appeared ready to accept more light but men like Uriah Smith push against these truths and the church changed. It moved in a different direction. EGW warned them, but the church did not listen and refuse to study believing all of their views were correct. They became stubborn even when she said that only ELOHIM is INFALLIBLE, they tried to label her prophet. She constantly told them that she was not, she was a messenger that is spelled out in Acts 2:17, 18.
EGW took the views of history and Biblical scholars of the time and they were incorrect. However, EGW never said all of her writings were written in stone except for what was shown! She made it very clear if error is found it should be shown loudly and it should be. We are now at the very edge when the Time of Trouble is about to begin. There is no excuse today, the Holy days, THE SACRED NAMES, the lie about the trinity and more is known today. The shovel has dug the truth that the Bible reserved for centuries. The Dead Sea Scroll was one of the greatest finds in the world, it prove the validity of the Bible.
Finally, the Bible should be understood and you have to start by correcting words that were put in deliberately for paganistic beliefs. We have the tools now, we can receive the knowledge from on HIGH if we ask and the truth will be shown clearly!
Upvote
0