• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

Is dog a special animal?

DogmaHunter

Code Monkey
Jan 26, 2014
16,757
8,532
Antwerp
✟158,405.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
What makes dog unique in a behavior described as "loyalty"? What makes a dog "loyal" to its master?

Please do not use special case to argue against it. Let's say that we are talking about 95% of the cases.


For starters, it's not unique.
Secondly, it's based primarily on a reward system (food & shelter).
Thirdly, they've been selected for such traits during millenia. It's not surprising that they are relatively loyal and extremely domesticated.

To end with, it's worth mentioning that the bond between a cat and it's owner has a much deeper emotional level (for the cat) as opposed with a dog.

Several experiments have shown this to be the case.
If you would describe the relationship with cats and dogs in human terms, then the owner is the "boss" of the dog, while with cats it's more like a friendship.
 
Upvote 0

Mainframes

Regular Member
Aug 6, 2003
595
21
46
Bristol
✟23,331.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Dogs form the loyalty bonds as it is a pack animal and will respond to it's 'alpha leader'. Once the dogs owner has become 'alpha leader' the bond will rarely be broken.

Its a trait inherited from wolves and improved 'compliance' bred into dogs over the millennia.
 
Upvote 0

juvenissun

... and God saw that it was good.
Apr 5, 2007
25,452
805
73
Chicago
✟139,126.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
If what you people said are right, then why don't we live with other animals (like wolf, or tiger, or fox) as we live with dog?

There has to be something special. What is that?
Why human chose dog at the first place?
 
Upvote 0

Elendur

Gamer and mathematician
Feb 27, 2012
2,405
30
Sweden - Umeå
✟25,452.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Engaged
If what you people said are right, then why don't we live with other animals (like wolf, or tiger, or fox) as we live with dog?

There has to be something special. What is that?
Why human chose dog at the first place?
I notice you avoided cats in general.

I've never owned a dog my whole life, we've had lots of cats though. They're loyal.
 
Upvote 0

Mainframes

Regular Member
Aug 6, 2003
595
21
46
Bristol
✟23,331.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
If what you people said are right, then why don't we live with other animals (like wolf, or tiger, or fox) as we live with dog?

There has to be something special. What is that?
Why human chose dog at the first place?

As I said earlier dogs are pack animals and it is this quality that enables the behaviour to be modified for use with human 'packs'.
 
Upvote 0

TLK Valentine

I've already read the books you want burned.
Apr 15, 2012
64,493
30,323
Behind the 8-ball, but ahead of the curve.
✟541,582.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
If what you people said are right, then why don't we live with other animals (like wolf, or tiger, or fox) as we live with dog?

There has to be something special. What is that?
Why human chose dog at the first place?

We didn't domesticate those animals -- just dogs.

You'll have to ask our ancestors why, but I suspect that they noticed the pack mentality and figured how, through domestication, they could become the "alpha" dogs themselves.
 
Upvote 0

DogmaHunter

Code Monkey
Jan 26, 2014
16,757
8,532
Antwerp
✟158,405.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
If what you people said are right, then why don't we live with other animals (like wolf, or tiger, or fox) as we live with dog?

There has to be something special. What is that?
Why human chose dog at the first place?

Most likely, nobody chose anything and the ancestral wolf (and cats) and ancient humans just grew towards eachother in some type of convergent evolution, due to win-win relationships.

When humans started using agriculture and building settlements, they started to gather thrash as well (remains of food etc). The ancestral wolves and cats would have been drawn to this. Why go through the trouble of hunting if you can just get some food for free?

In the other direction, this was helpfull for humans as well, as the ancestral wolves are pretty territorial. They would chase other animals away and / or warn the humans of approaching danger by barking etc.
Cats would have been usefull to keep the houses, stockpiles and fields free from mouses, rats, rabbits, etc.

It's not hard to see how humans would have found this usefull. To the point that they would start giving them actual food and not just left overs. And so the symbiotic relationship began.

If you think it through, it's not hard to understand.
You seem to have a tendency to ask a question, look at a superficial answer and then stop thinking about it.

For once, try to go the extra mile.

At this point though, I'ld like to remind you of a few other things that, imo, are more remarkable (yet, still naturally explainable):
- horses for transport
- oxes for transport and farming
- cows for milk and food
- pigeons as a post office
- falcons (and several other birds) for hunting

Cats and dogs, to me, seem a rather obvious convergent evolution. Both have something to gain by co-existing. It's also worthy to note that with cats and dogs, we have a special kind of relationship as opposed to with pigeons, cows, horses, etc...

Cats and dogs are almost seen as family members, as friends, as compagnons. Which is an expected relationship if it grew out of a win-win origin as outlined above.

Whereas the other examples (pigeons, oxes, cows, etc) are seen more as "utilities" then anything else.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

bhsmte

Newbie
Apr 26, 2013
52,761
11,792
✟254,941.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
I notice you avoided cats in general.

I've never owned a dog my whole life, we've had lots of cats though. They're loyal.

I have had many dogs and one cat over the years and I would agree, cats are loyal too, they just possess different behavioral traits.

That cat I had would actually come when you called it, which isn't typical. I have always been partial to dogs though, because they just seem to connect better and the one's I have had, certainly appear to have an ability to read your moods and even offer a form of support when you are down in the dumps.
 
Upvote 0

Elendur

Gamer and mathematician
Feb 27, 2012
2,405
30
Sweden - Umeå
✟25,452.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Engaged
I have had many dogs and one cat over the years and I would agree, cats are loyal too, they just possess different behavioral traits.

That cat I had would actually come when you called it, which isn't typical. I have always been partial to dogs though, because they just seem to connect better and the one's I have had, certainly appear to have an ability to read your moods and even offer a form of support when you are down in the dumps.
I can definitely understand liking dogs, I know quite a lot of people who has dogs and the ones who're raised correctly are great. The others... Not so much... But, of course, that's not the dogs fault.

As for the empathy, it's quite clear that the cats are more individualistic, so one shouldn't expect the same level as for dogs. But they have their moments. (Personal experience, quite touchy, won't go into details)

The cats make up for it by not being needy. We've always had outdoor cats, with a lot of time where they cannot get it (due to nobody being home and no cat door). That makes it all the more precious when they want to interact.
 
Upvote 0

selfinflikted

Under Deck
Jul 13, 2006
11,441
786
46
✟39,014.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Democrat
The difference between dogs and cats:

aeNXKRQ_460s.jpg
 
Upvote 0

florida2

Well-Known Member
Sep 18, 2011
2,092
434
✟33,191.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
If what you people said are right, then why don't we live with other animals (like wolf, or tiger, or fox) as we live with dog?

There has to be something special. What is that?
Why human chose dog at the first place?

Dogs ARE wolves. Wolves were initially domesticated and selective breeding has resulted in modern dogs.
 
Upvote 0

keith99

sola dosis facit venenum
Jan 16, 2008
23,133
6,824
72
✟394,023.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
If what you people said are right, then why don't we live with other animals (like wolf, or tiger, or fox) as we live with dog?

There has to be something special. What is that?
Why human chose dog at the first place?

Humans chose wolfs. Dogs are the result.

Oops.
 
Upvote 0

keith99

sola dosis facit venenum
Jan 16, 2008
23,133
6,824
72
✟394,023.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Both dogs and cats recognize the transitive nature of friendship. E.g. the friend of a friend is a friend.

I brought a dog, well known for chasing cats home from college (he had to flea campus security). When I entered my parents home I was greeted by Lucky, our black cat who had beat the *** out of 2 weimeriners.

Each looked at the other, looked at me and decided the 'natural enemy' was a friend.
 
Upvote 0

Michael

Contributor
Site Supporter
Feb 5, 2002
25,145
1,721
Mt. Shasta, California
Visit site
✟343,148.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Upvote 0

CabVet

Question everything
Dec 7, 2011
11,738
176
Los Altos, CA
✟43,402.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
What makes dog unique in a behavior described as "loyalty"? What makes a dog "loyal" to its master?

Please do not use special case to argue against it. Let's say that we are talking about 95% of the cases.

I argue that dogs are not life. They were created by god just to serve their masters.
 
Upvote 0

digitalgoth

Junior Member
Jun 4, 2014
258
47
✟32,820.00
Faith
Other Religion
I argue that dogs are not life. They were created by god just to serve their masters.

Dogs are not alive?

Dogs were created to serve their Masters? Wasn't there a time in history where the word was Africans? Some sort of biblical justification was given, but I forget.
 
Upvote 0