Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Incorrect.basically there is no correlation between co2 and sea levels.
I did alreadyIncorrect.
Try actual peer-reviewed science, not alt-right echo-chambers.
Jumping in without authorization: Some people know more than any scientists because the people are honest, truthful, listening to Jesus, and will not take a bribe, nor tell a lie.Why would I believe that you know more than the scientists at MIT, for starters?
References please?I did already
Followers of the false prophet. Their books full of lies written with money earned deceitfully.You explained???
May I point out that I have cited four sources of information with links in this thread. You haven't cited any. Why would I believe that you know more than the scientists at MIT, for starters?
Not at all! Many Climatologists are Christians like Catharine Hayhoe. She is an amazing witness in her work - and many environmental crusaders think of her as a hero. The UN gave her one of their highest awards - “United Nations Champion of the Earth!” https://www.amazon.com.au/Saving-Us-Climate-Scientists-Healing/dp/1982143835Followers of the false prophet. Their books full of lies written with money earned deceitfully.
Followers of the false prophet. Their books full of lies written with money earned deceitfully.
A chain is built upon the information gathered. Everly link must have NO FAULT for the chain to be unbreakable. There is faith involved.Then who is the false prophet they are following?
In a sense no - because we are discussing empirical science.A chain is built upon the information gathered. Everly link must have NO FAULT for the chain to be unbreakable. There is faith involved.
A chain is built upon the information gathered. Everly link must have NO FAULT for the chain to be unbreakable. There is faith involved.
It kills tens of thousands of people every year.How dangerous is Dihydrogen Oxide by comparison? It is also known as Dihydrogen Monoxide and as Hydric Acid.
You're using that example out of context. It's used to show how a science-y sounding name can scare people so they don't think about the old correlation vs causation. "Did you know Dihydrogen Monoxide is in most cases of breast cancer?" They shouldn't be worried about the chemical-sounding name - but the fact that the question uses the vague 'is in'.How dangerous is Dihydrogen Oxide by comparison? It is also known as Dihydrogen Monoxide and as Hydric Acid.
It is entirely WITHIN the context.You're using that example out of context.
It has nothing to do with correlation vs causation. It is an illustration of how science-y stuff can scare people into not acting rationally. Dihydrogen monoxide is of course just water. It is responsible for damage in floods and monsoons, and people drown in it, and people get steam burns and all kinds of things. But try to live without it ....It's used to show how a science-y sounding name can scare people so they don't think about the old correlation vs causation.
The only ignorance revealed is that people who panic over CO2 can also panic over H2O when H2O is given an accurate but uncommon name.But we KNOW what CO2's effective properties are. We've known since Eunice Foote discovered it in 1856. It's something you look up in an old physics textbook - and to use the Dihydrogen Monoxide meme to try and cast doubt on this is to reveal ignorance.
As an educated biologist who can diagram out carbon cycles in my sleep I don't expect everybody to know all about it, but most do anyway. And yet there are people who get over-hyped about Carbon Dioxide, even to the point of panic. It is a real greenhouse gas, as is by the way Dihydrogen Monoxide, and it's levels have risen since the Industrial Revolution. While we cannot control the amount of water vapor in the atmosphere we can have some small effect in reducing the burning of fossil fuels until the deep ocean can sequester some of that CO2.And I say all this as someone with a Social Sciences background who is only vaguely aware of what all this means. Basically - if even I know this - then anyone interested in the subject should know it!
In the same way Carbon Dioxide is necessary to life. Without sufficient CO2 in your lungs your body doesn't get the signal to breathe. Plants die without it. It puts out fires. It's necessary. Just not too much of it. Which is typical of many things. We need some of it but not too much.
The only ignorance revealed is that people who panic over CO2 can also panic over H2O when H2O is given an accurate but uncommon name.
As an educated biologist who can diagram out carbon cycles in my sleep I don't expect everybody to know all about it, but most do anyway. And yet there are people who get over-hyped about Carbon Dioxide, even to the point of panic. It is a real greenhouse gas, as is by the way Dihydrogen Monoxide, and it's levels have risen since the Industrial Revolution. While we cannot control the amount of water vapor in the atmosphere we can have some small effect in reducing the burning of fossil fuels until the deep ocean can sequester some of that CO2.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?