• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Is birth control a form of discrimination?

Washington

Well-Known Member
Jul 3, 2003
5,092
358
Washington state
✟7,305.00
Faith
Agnostic
Poor uneducated people don't use it as much and tend to have many children while more affluent people tend to use it and have less children. Isn't it prejudiced to discriminate based on economic status?
Who is discriminating against whom?
 
Upvote 0

Paulos23

Never tell me the odds!
Mar 23, 2005
8,426
4,780
Washington State
✟370,707.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Poor uneducated people don't use it as much and tend to have many children while more affluent people tend to use it and have less children. Isn't it prejudiced to discriminate based on economic status?
Uh? How is that discrimination?
 
Upvote 0

Paulos23

Never tell me the odds!
Mar 23, 2005
8,426
4,780
Washington State
✟370,707.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Society is discriminating against fetuses of middle and upper class mothers.
So you are saying that people who decide to have smaller families are discriminating against fetuses?

Sorry, that one doesn't track...
 
Upvote 0

Shemjaza

Regular Member
Site Supporter
Apr 17, 2006
6,466
4,001
47
✟1,127,835.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
AU-Greens
Poor uneducated people don't use it as much and tend to have many children while more affluent people tend to use it and have less children. Isn't it prejudiced to discriminate based on economic status?
If you consider contraception to be a form of discrimination against people who don't even exist yet... shouldn't you be out impregnating as many women from as many backgrounds as possible right now?

I'm reasonably sure you would think it a great sin to randomly impregnate people... but you shouldn't discriminate against people on the grounds that their father was an adulterous sinner.

(Personally I don't consider foetuses to be people... and I defiantly don't think non-existing, potential foetuses are people.)
 
Upvote 0

Washington

Well-Known Member
Jul 3, 2003
5,092
358
Washington state
✟7,305.00
Faith
Agnostic
Society is discriminating against fetuses of middle and upper class mothers.
Well, for one thing, middle and upper class mothers are part of society, so in effect a good portion of society would be discriminating against their own fetuses. And for another thing, what fetuses? The very nature of birth control effectively bars fetuses from discrimination. It's like complaining that people don't call you anymore since your phone service was disconnected. Or that people don't like your art work, although you've never done any.
 
Upvote 0

Shemjaza

Regular Member
Site Supporter
Apr 17, 2006
6,466
4,001
47
✟1,127,835.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
AU-Greens
It isn't discrimination.

But it is mildly worrying that liberal-minded people are less likely to have lots of babies.
How many do you really need?

One day I hope to be a father to one or maybe two children. I figure that way I can give them the time and reseouces they need to grow up into happy productive people. If I had 8 kids I'd worry that I couldn't always be there for them.
 
Upvote 0

Paulos23

Never tell me the odds!
Mar 23, 2005
8,426
4,780
Washington State
✟370,707.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
How many do you really need?

One day I hope to be a father to one or maybe two children. I figure that way I can give them the time and reseouces they need to grow up into happy productive people. If I had 8 kids I'd worry that I couldn't always be there for them.
Personally I think having more then two kids in an industrial country is bordering on criminal. With the amount of resources those kids will go through before they even start to contribute back, we can't keep that up forever.
 
Upvote 0

Ramona

If you can't see my siggy, I've disappeared ;)
Site Supporter
Sep 4, 2006
7,498
672
Visit site
✟78,432.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Married
Birth control pills can easily be obtained at Planned Parenthood for free if money is an issue. Birth control patches, rings, implants, and injections need to be prescribed by your ob/gyn, but they aren't significantly more effective than just the plain ol' pill.
 
Upvote 0

jayem

Naturalist
Jun 24, 2003
15,427
7,164
74
St. Louis, MO.
✟424,020.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Disparity in birth control use isn't discrimination. It's self-selection. Or even more specifically, it's a class trait. People in higher socio-economic strata are more likely to use birth control. That may or may not be a problem. But I don't see it as any kind of adverse discrimination against anyone.
 
Upvote 0

CaDan

I remember orange CF
Site Supporter
Jan 30, 2004
23,298
2,832
The Society of the Spectacle
✟134,677.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Poor uneducated people don't use it as much and tend to have many children while more affluent people tend to use it and have less children. Isn't it prejudiced to discriminate based on economic status?

No.

Next question.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ramona
Upvote 0

mpok1519

Veteran
Jul 8, 2007
11,508
347
✟36,350.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Asanine post.

since when do zygotes/blastulas/gastrulas/fetuses have human rights?

People of lower classes generally can't afford the more expensive forms of birthcontrol. But you're also forgetting tha birth-control is not only prescription pills, but also prophylactics such as condoms and diaphragms, and surgical procedures, and certain sexual practices. People of every class use birth-controls.

You're making some strong statements; "poor people have more babies than rich people" is on the verge of one of the most ignorant statements I have hear don these boards.
 
Upvote 0

wanderingone

I'm not lost I'm just wandering
Jul 6, 2005
11,090
932
58
New York
✟38,279.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Poor uneducated people don't use it as much and tend to have many children while more affluent people tend to use it and have less children. Isn't it prejudiced to discriminate based on economic status?


??? People with less resources have less access to birth control. Their states DO discriminate by failing to subsidize access to birth control. I'm not sure what you are pointing to as the discrimination though
 
Upvote 0

Autumnleaf

Legend
Jun 18, 2005
24,828
1,034
✟33,297.00
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Married
Well, for one thing, middle and upper class mothers are part of society, so in effect a good portion of society would be discriminating against their own fetuses.

They are. Would you feel okay about this if white people could discriminate against black fetuses? What makes it okay for people to do it in their own family?

And for another thing, what fetuses? The very nature of birth control effectively bars fetuses from discrimination. It's like complaining that people don't call you anymore since your phone service was disconnected. Or that people don't like your art work, although you've never done any.

Fetuses don't have phones or make art, they are too young to do that. They can grow or they can be killed.
 
Upvote 0