Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Also, there was a political bias study done so many years ago, which indicates the people don't use rational processes in the brain when contemplating challenges to political opinion. So much as emotional areas used in conflict resolution.
Emory Study Lights Up The Political Brain
Again faith is different to politics, just as its different to schizophrenia. But there may be some lessons to pick up?
It may have to do with the idea that faith is not a single belief, rather its a complex of interrelated beliefs and also behaviours. Like, a "web of belief" in the philosophy of science. With a WoB falsifying a single idea doesn't necessarily mean abandoning a whole theory, rather, adjustments can be made elsewhere in the WoB.
So, because faith is a complex, its difficult to "uproot" or "replant" in a single swoop. Like if you have a houseplant, repotting it you need to pay attention to the root system. That may be compared to faith beliefs, eg in God. Because there are roots stemming throughout the brain which have connections to this belief, then changing it is potentially linked to a lot of unconscious counter pressures.
This is true, but at least some of what we are exposed to is voluntary. If belief is an involuntary conviction based on what we’re exposed to, and we have a degree of control over what we’re exposed to, doesn’t that mean that belief can be considered voluntary to some degree?Belief is an involuntary conviction based on information and stimuli to which you have been exposed.
This is true, but at least some of what we are exposed to is voluntary. If belief is an involuntary conviction based on what we’re exposed to, and we have a degree of control over what we’re exposed to, doesn’t that mean that belief can be considered voluntary to some degree?
This is true, but at least some of what we are exposed to is voluntary. If belief is an involuntary conviction based on what we’re exposed to, and we have a degree of control over what we’re exposed to, doesn’t that mean that belief can be considered voluntary to some degree?
There are all kinds of irrational reasons to prefer certain beliefs over others. People in denial of their problems, conspiracy theorists, and cult members are prime examples of this. Forming a belief isn’t as simple as flipping a switch, but it’s also not an entirely passive process — unless you’re willing to argue a positive case for determinism.The other thing to consider, too, is why would you direct your focus in a certain direction, unless you had already obtained information causing you to lean in that direction?
There are all kinds of irrational reasons to prefer certain beliefs over others.
People in denial of their problems, conspiracy theorists, and cult members are prime examples of this.
Forming a belief isn’t as simple as flipping a switch, but it’s also not an entirely passive process — unless you’re willing to argue a positive case for determinism.
I’m just wondering where you believe choice comes into the equation in human psychology and — by extension — behavior, if you don’t believe in some form of determinism. If we don’t decide our motivations, as you say, then we aren’t in control of what irrational beliefs we pick up to serve those motivations. If we’re not in control of the process by which our beliefs are formed, then we can’t be in control of our beliefs. If we’re not in control of our beliefs, and beliefs inform actions, how can we say we’re in control of our actions?I wouldn't say so. Yes, there are many irrational reasons people believe things, but I'd say it's probably pretty rare that people prefer one belief over another while also RECOGNIZING its irrationality. Other people may recognize how irrational it is, but typically the believer has rationalized it, albeit erroneously, to themselves.
These are all examples of irrational beliefs in our eyes, not theirs.
I don't think it has anything to do with determinism. Nobody is destined to believe one thing or another. It has to do with the ignorance of information, and in many cases, the ignorance of how to properly analyze information.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?