The first question asked in Philosophy is inevitably "Can God make a rock so big that God can't pick it up?" Usually the answer is smoke screened with some business about "God's power cannot contradict God's wisdom." What do you think?
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Usually the answer is smoke screened with some business about "God's power cannot contradict God's wisdom." What do you think?
depthdeception said:The first question asked in Philosophy is inevitably "Can God make a rock so big that God can't pick it up?" Usually the answer is smoke screened with some business about "God's power cannot contradict God's wisdom." What do you think?
depthdeception said:The first question asked in Philosophy is inevitably "Can God make a rock so big that God can't pick it up?" Usually the answer is smoke screened with some business about "God's power cannot contradict God's wisdom." What do you think?
Outrider said:But the Bible never states that God can do anything. In fact, the Bible states that there are things God cannot do, such as lie or contradict himself (which is essentially the same thing). He also cannot allow sin to stand in his presence, which is a very important idea to us, since it leads us to the cross to find a way to be justified.
The first question asked in Philosophy is inevitably "Can God make a rock so big that God can't pick it up?" Usually the answer is smoke screened with some business about "God's power cannot contradict God's wisdom." What do you think?
Simonline said:Easy, the question is impertinent because it seeks to play God off against himself (thereby placing God in a philosophical 'no-win' situation) and should therefore be sumarily dismissed. It actually reveals a lot more about the questioner than it does about God. It would tell me to waste no further time with such a person who clearly has an underlying agenda.
Simonline said:There are some things which are 'impossible' for God (apart from that which is absolutely impossible anyway such as creating a square circle or frying ice etc.)
How about Jesus in the dessert, remember "do not put the lord your God to the test." It's pretty evident that Christ could have sinned, but chose not to. There are times in scripture where God swears oaths to his people by his own name since there isn't anyone higher. I wouldn't put anything past God.Simonline said:such as being absolutely incapable of and utterly impervious to change (i.e Immutable) being absolutely incapable of and utterly impervious to sin against whom would he sin?!)
Simonline said:and being absolutely incapable of and utterly impervious to death (from whom would God be separated?)
God can have many essenses at once, and yet still be 'subtangent' (may not be the word I looking for.)Simonline said:Thus, for God, somethings which are posibble for us as relative beings, are absolutely impossible for him as the absolute Being, but this cannot under any circumstances, be construed as a disadvantage for God.
Outrider said:This answer is not a smoke screen, it is, in fact, a true answer to a foolish question. The question itself is a smoke screen and can only be answered that it is folly. The question is proposed generally in derision of God's character, it is an insult to his majesty put forth by the foolishness of human philosophy. But since a wise answer is not acceptable, the only solution to the question is that there is no God. You see, when one takes this direction in their thinking, they are, on the strength of human rationalism, proposing that deity is a contradiction which cancels itself out.
But the Bible never states that God can do anything. In fact, the Bible states that there are things God cannot do, such as lie or contradict himself (which is essentially the same thing). He also cannot allow sin to stand in his presence, which is a very important idea to us, since it leads us to the cross to find a way to be justified.
Simonline said:Easy, the question is impertinent because it seeks to play God off against himself (thereby placing God in a philosophical 'no-win' situation) and should therefore be sumarily dismissed. It actually reveals a lot more about the questioner than it does about God. It would tell me to waste no further time with such a person who clearly has an underlying agenda.
There are some things which are 'impossible' for God (apart from that which is absolutely impossible anyway such as creating a square circle or frying ice etc.) such as being absolutely incapable of and utterly impervious to change (i.e Immutable) being absolutely incapable of and utterly impervious to sin (against whom would he sin?!) and being absolutely incapable of and utterly impervious to death (from whom would God be separated?)
Thus, for God, somethings which are posibble for us as relative beings, are absolutely impossible for him as the absolute Being, but this cannot under any circumstances, be construed as a disadvantage for God.
Simonline.
Fellowship said:Jesus did have a hard time carrying just a cross, I don't think he could have picked up but so huge of a rock.![]()
It's my impression that God is not subject to possiblities, or impossiblities.![]()
There you have it a legit answer, and a smoke screen all in one post. I hope this helps.![]()
Outrider said:But the Bible never states that God can do anything. In fact, the Bible states that there are things God cannot do, such as lie or contradict himself (which is essentially the same thing). He also cannot allow sin to stand in his presence, which is a very important idea to us, since it leads us to the cross to find a way to be justified.
For with God nothing shall be impossible.