Is anyone else having trouble accessing the wiki?

[reddogs]

Then it must be coming from whoever is providing this server for CF.

That is my thought, but I would never say so as it would be unkind for such a thing to be done, at the least.....

 

[DarylFawcett]

I think that it was for the sake of unity that somebody suggested in the wiki that there would be separate POLLS; one POLL for the proposed 2.1 and 2.2 rules and a separate POLL for the proposed 2.3 and 2.4 and 2.5 rules.

I saw the reasoning and merit in that suggestion and subsequently agreed with the suggestion.

If we do this as a yes or no package POLL, then solely because of 2.3 and 2.4 and 2.5 I will be saying no, even though I am all for the proposed 2.1 and 2.2 rules.

 

[DarylFawcett]

But they could be blocking a group of IP numbers, rather than simply your's.

 

[reddogs]

I think that it was for the sake of unity that somebody suggested in the wiki that there would be separate POLLS; one POLL for the proposed 2.1 and 2.2 rules and a separate POLL for the proposed 2.3 and 2.4 and 2.5 rules.

I saw the reasoning and merit in that suggestion and subsequently agreed with the suggestion.

If we do this as a yes or no package POLL, then solely because of 2.3 and 2.4 and 2.5 I will be saying no, even though I am all for the proposed 2.1 and 2.2 rules.

Yes, but 2.3 and 2.4 and 2.5 are the heart of the matter, 2.1 and 2.2 are tweeking minor issues. The Sabbath is a need while "stay to the topic of the origional post " is beyond the realm of posibility 100% of the time for most but is more of a want since the forum began...

 

[reddogs]

But they could be blocking a group of IP numbers, rather than simply your's.

Lets just say I want to give CF the benefit of the doubt and hope its a fluke, and try to get around it......

 

[DarylFawcett]

What do others here think about this?

Should we separate them into the two suggested POLLS, or do it all as one POLL?

 

[reddogs]

What do others here think about this?

Should we separate them into the two suggested POLLS, or do it all as one POLL?

Please keep the vote on these rules together, as it will do much good and help us all to unite as we see fair and honest rules being implemented....

I am asking everyone for this one favor as the Sabbath it important to me, yet I want to be able to help as a moderator and make sure that everyone is treated fairly and honesty and I make that pledge not as a campaign promise as politicians do, but as a desire that I want to fulfill but I need to have my Sabbath. Please it means so much.........

 

[DarylFawcett]

I suggest we do it in one POLL and vote each one up or down individually.

I suggest the POLL looks something like this:

2.1 (quoted) - For or against (as the two options).
2.2 (quoted) - For or against.
2.3 (quoted) - For or against.
2.4 (quoted) - For or against.
2.5 (quoted) - For or against.

 

[reddogs]

I suggest we do it in one POLL and vote each one up or down individually.

I suggest the POLL looks something like this:

2.1 (quoted) - For or against (as the two options).
2.2 (quoted) - For or against.
2.3 (quoted) - For or against.
2.4 (quoted) - For or against.
2.5 (quoted) - For or against.

Fair enough, that way there is no 'all or nothing' vote forced upon anyone.......

 

[DarylFawcett]

I created the POLL and some of us have already voted there.

 

[IntoTheCrimsonSky]

I can access the WIKI with no problems.

Hey, Crimson, you got a CF pet! Right on!

It was actually yours that got me to finally give up the 700 blessings for one. *lol* It was a hard desicion to pick what type, though.

Lets just say I want to give CF the benefit of the doubt and hope its a fluke, and try to get around it......

I'd like to hope so too..

I think that it was for the sake of unity that somebody suggested in the wiki that there would be separate POLLS; one POLL for the proposed 2.1 and 2.2 rules and a separate POLL for the proposed 2.3 and 2.4 and 2.5 rules.

I saw the reasoning and merit in that suggestion and subsequently agreed with the suggestion.

If we do this as a yes or no package POLL, then solely because of 2.3 and 2.4 and 2.5 I will be saying no, even though I am all for the proposed 2.1 and 2.2 rules.

That was pretty much what I was feeling when I suggested the seperate polls. They seemed to be such different subject matter that I figured they'd do better on their own.

Please keep the vote on these rules together, as it will do much good and help us all to unite as we see fair and honest rules being implemented....

I am asking everyone for this one favor as the Sabbath it important to me, yet I want to be able to help as a moderator and make sure that everyone is treated fairly and honesty and I make that pledge not as a campaign promise as politicians do, but as a desire that I want to fulfill but I need to have my Sabbath. Please it means so much.........

Since it's your rules I'm not going to fight this, though. I can respect that you wish it to be this way, I just figured it might be more of a fair vote seperate.

I suggest we do it in one POLL and vote each one up or down individually.

I suggest the POLL looks something like this:

2.1 (quoted) - For or against (as the two options).
2.2 (quoted) - For or against.
2.3 (quoted) - For or against.
2.4 (quoted) - For or against.
2.5 (quoted) - For or against.

Seems fair enough. Best of both worlds in the end, right?

 

[reddogs]

It was actually yours that got me to finally give up the 700 blessings for one. *lol* It was a hard desicion to pick what type, though.



I'd like to hope so too..



That was pretty much what I was feeling when I suggested the seperate polls. They seemed to be such different subject matter that I figured they'd do better on their own.



Since it's your rules I'm not going to fight this, though. I can respect that you wish it to be this way, I just figured it might be more of a fair vote seperate.



Seems fair enough. Best of both worlds in the end, right?

After talking with my techs, they were able to clear what was blocking me from the threads (I wont say how as I dont want to let 'whatever caused it' know the tools we have). The only problem is that as soon as I log in, it resets and blocks me immeadiately so I will have to debate the rules through a glass, darkly....

 

[reddogs]

Finally I am able to get in, but has the train already gone and left me behind.......:o