irreducible complexity

[IntelligentDesigner2]

I’ve never reported a single post in the time I’ve been here. Think before you assume.

You did report TheRealSkeptic 6 out of 7 times which caused a ban on that account. You were it. I am not assuming anything, you can clearly read it in the account's control panel.

 

[IntelligentDesigner2]

They were deleted when your account was banned I assume.

Where in the rules does it say that you delete all posts from an account that was never issued a warning of violating rules.

 

[IntelligentDesigner2]

They were deleted when your account was banned I assume.

My account should have never been banned. I followed all proscribed rules. Please provide me with evidence that the account name: TheIntelligentDesigner violated any forum rule. There are none.

 

[GoSeminoles!]

Where in the rules does it say that you delete all posts from an account that was never issued a warning of violating rules.

Nobody here knows. You will have to take it up with the moderators or the admin folks. You've beaten this horse enough, so maybe it's time to get back to the regular program.

 

[notto]

Did somebody call the . . .

 

[IntelligentDesigner2]

Nobody here knows. You will have to take it up with the moderators or the admin folks. You've beaten this horse enough, so maybe it's time to get back to the regular program.

This thread is useless now anyway. It has become automatically onesided.

 

[nvxplorer]

You did report TheRealSkeptic 6 out of 7 times which caused a ban on that account. You were it. I am not assuming anything, you can clearly read it in the account's control panel.

I’m telling you I’ve never reported your posts. I’d remember reporting six posts. Where can I view this information from the control panel? Are you sure you’re not thinking of warnings? I have nothing to do with warnings. They are issued by the mods.

 

[IntelligentDesigner2]

Did somebody call the . . .

Speaks volumes coming from a contributor of this forum.

 

[Grengor]

This thread is useless now anyway. It has become automatically onesided.

"Sides" don't matter. If you actually understood most arguments directed at you threads would actually go somewhere.

 

[MartinM]

My account should have never been banned. I followed all proscribed rules. Please provide me with evidence that the account name: TheIntelligentDesigner violated any forum rule. There are none.

It seems you're about as well-informed about what the forum rules actually are as you are about information theory:



2.8 A member may have more than one account on this site but you will not use such accounts to bypass a suspension or ban from the forums. Such accounts will be banned. Any warnings on separate accounts will be counted towards the same user.



As to your claims that you were given no opportunity to appeal:




13. Appeals against warnings, suspensions or bannings, can be made by a member through the Staff Feedback Form found on the Staff Team Listings page here. Appeals will go to the staff members in the same staff team that are senior by one level to the staff member being appealed against.

 

[notto]

Where in the rules does it say that you delete all posts from an account that was never issued a warning of violating rules.

Logic should tell you that an individual breaks the rules and is banned, not the account and that any subsequent account made by said user would be subject to any decision made on accounts set up previously by the user.

Setting up a new account to avoid previous warning and suspensions is avoided by this. The rules are intelligently designed as such.

 

[KerrMetric]

My account should have never been banned. I followed all proscribed rules. Please provide me with evidence that the account name: TheIntelligentDesigner violated any forum rule. There are none.

I don't know and didn't even know you'd been banned until last night. You may be correct. I've never reported a post on any forum at any time. I don't think adults need to report. In fact I think the report facility should not exist.

 

[IntelligentDesigner2]

Logic should tell you that an individual breaks the rules and is banned, not the account and that any subsequent account made by said user would be subject to any decision made on accounts set up previously by the user.

Setting up a new account to avoid previous warning and suspensions is avoided by this. The rules are intelligently designed as such.

Ok then, my ideas are officially supressed. Have a nice day. Also, thanks for giving me the opportunity to appeal the warnings. That was fair. Also, you have no ability to ban individual people using different accounts, except when the ideas of the banned account matches the ideas of the accounts that are not yet banned according to you. So when you ban an account, such as account name: TheIntelligentDesigner, you do so not of the fact that that account broke a forum rule, but because the ideas and writting would suspect that the two accounts, the one that is banned, and the one that is not, are equal.

 

[Grengor]

Ok... shouldn't this be carried out in PM's? Now... back to IC.
IC systems have been shown to not be IC, neeeeext.

 

[IntelligentDesigner2]

I don't know and didn't even know you'd been banned until last night. You may be correct. I've never reported a post on any forum at any time. I don't think adults need to report. In fact I think the report facility should not exist.

I've been banned under three account names for no reason. Not banned per say, because I can log on under that account, but the 'proceed' screen loads me to the main christianforums page as a guest, where the account name is visible on the top of the forum as actively online, however, I am logged on as guest, and the account name becomes a ghost.

 

[IntelligentDesigner2]

Ok... shouldn't this be carried out in PM's? Now... back to IC.
IC systems have been shown to not be IC, neeeeext.

This thread was already ruined. All of the opposing viewpoints in support of ID have been supressed, whereas now this thread is just onesided, with you adding to it.

 

[Grengor]

Yep, we're all out to get you. You're being prosecuted for your beliefs.
All the supporters of ID never really answered questions, the point would always fly over their and your's head. Simple fallacies taken to the extreme, misinformation, etc...

 

[TheIntelligentDesigner3]

Logic should tell you that an individual breaks the rules and is banned, not the account and that any subsequent account made by said user would be subject to any decision made on accounts set up previously by the user.

Setting up a new account to avoid previous warning and suspensions is avoided by this. The rules are intelligently designed as such.

Where on the forum does it say this? You keep supressing my ideas by deleting posts that follow all forum rules, and allow others in this forum to flame me personally without any action.

 

[TheIntelligentDesigner3]

Yep, we're all out to get you. You're being prosecuted for your beliefs.
All the supporters of ID never really answered questions, the point would always fly over their and your's head. Simple fallacies taken to the extreme, misinformation, etc...

My answers are always deleted.

 

[TheIntelligentDesigner3]

my accounts are always deleted.