- Sep 13, 2005
- 863
- 30
- 44
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- US-Republican
How so? I've only recently begun reading the book I bought.Unfortunately I am and they are disgustingly Arminian.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
How so? I've only recently begun reading the book I bought.Unfortunately I am and they are disgustingly Arminian.
Since when was Sadam Hussain a Reformed Baptist?
Unfortunately I am and they are disgustingly Arminian.
do yourself a fav AV , go and buy a pair of these at the weekend ;![]()
![]()
......
![]()
This oil painting by Robert Nettles was done as a final senior project in a painting class at Mississippi College. The project, containing six portraits, was designed and executed by Robert. The faces, beginning at 12:00 and moving clockwise are J. P. Boyce, John Bunyan, John A. Broadus, William Carey, B. H. Carroll, and Charles Spurgeon. The Logo contains the sword and trowel emblematic of the ministry of Spurgeon, the carpenter's tools in the top third of the shield representing the incarnation of the Lord, the cobbler's tools reminiscent of the plodding practicality of the great Baptist missionary William Carey, and the tinker's anvil calling to mind the great soul of experiential Calvinism John Bunyan.
http://www.founders.org/fpress/fathers.html
Hi guys! I am a Baptist and I hold the doctrines of grace, but I am not Reformed (in the sense that I hold New Covenant Theology, not Covenant Theology).
Can I hang around? No, I am not here to argue.....(Saddam Hussein a ReBap? Hah! That sure made me laugh.)
About how calvinists should present the Gospel: I think Charles Spurgeon's All of Grace is a terrific model of how to present the Gospel without "Arminianizing" it. All the passion in calling sinners to trust the crucified and risen Savior and Lord is there, without false approaches (i.e. trust Christ because He died for your sin - is that religious blackmail? lol!)...
I asked this question myself two years ago to another calvinist friend, since most tracts and tools are too Arminian. He told me that the gospel call in the Bible is twofold: REPENT and BELIEVE Mark 1:15, Acts 20:21).
I made a tract before for my church and I hope to share it here next time.Perhaps you can comment on it and help me improve it. I sought to avoid the Arminian paradigms (e.g. 4SL)....
Indeed. I sometimes wonder how Amazing Grace would be worded if an Arminian who truly believed in his own theology wrote it. Perhaps it would be something like:Tell it as it is! Let sin be sin and hell be hell, and man without God is lost indeed!
People nowadays sing Amazing Grace without even understanding it.
It's funny how the Calvinists basher's favorite hymn always seems to be Amazing Grace and I feel like pulling them aside and saying, "Don't you see that this song is the embodiment of the theology that you so dislike?!?"