• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Iraqi "Full soverignty" apparently means 135,000 U.S. troops handling security

Raindog

Active Member
Mar 31, 2004
56
3
✟191.00
Faith
Lutheran
I've tried supporting the President in this war, but it just becomes more and more apparent that he's politicizing the war. This alleged handover on June 30 appears to be a sham. He's now saying the Iraqis will be self governing in amout a month...

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=514&e=3&u=/ap/20040528/ap_on_go_pr_wh/us_iraq_1

But now can you have full sovereignty if you have an occupying force of 135,000 U.S. troops who will likely be there for up to five years? It just sounds like such a politically motived stunt.
 

feral

Dostoyevsky was right
Jan 8, 2003
3,368
344
✟20,216.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
I agree. Of course I understand that the U.S. is concerned about the political chaos in Iraq and afraid of moves for power by "unwanteds", but I think that should be left to the United Nations to monitor. When U.S. officials get to put the Iraqi government into power, veto requests for Sharia law and guide the writing of a constitution it doesn't look like we are very willing to let go. I wonder how this will play out...
 
Upvote 0

Mistyfogg

Well-Known Member
Oct 30, 2003
782
120
✟24,034.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
I could have told you that Bush has no plans for leaving Iraq. My husband's squadron is deploying every unit to Iraq in the next few months and plan on being there for about 9-months to 1 year, then getting a 6 month break and returning again. Saying that he is turning the power over to Iraqi's is a total lie. The troops that will be over there will be hunting out insurgents, which seems like a clear indicator to me that we are still at war and the Mission is not accomplished.
 
Upvote 0

brewmama

Senior Veteran
Dec 14, 2002
6,087
1,011
Colorado
Visit site
✟35,218.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Uh, we STILL have troops in Germany. Did we fail there too? What about the fact that the Iraqi people don't WANT us to abandon them after they start running things? What does hunting out insurgents have to do with running the country?
 
Upvote 0