Hi, all... just chiming in (this is the first time I saw this thread) and I have a couple points I'd like to express.
tcampen said:
I think most reasonable people on any side of the issue would agree that the fertilized egg is a "life." Heck, even a sperm would be considered a "life." What is considered "life" is not really the issue.
Just honesty here tcampen, I'm not convinced that sperm would be considered life because it does not cary out metabolic processes that are required for life (the ability to consume resources, grow, and dispose of wastes for example). It is also arguable that since a sperm cell does not actually have DNA (only half of a DNA) then it also could not be considered in and of itself life.
tcampen said:
anyone who believes personhood begins at conception, should be against procedures like in vitro fertilization, where a number of fertilized eggs are necessarily destroyed. Or, if abortions should be criminalized to protect the life and health of the fertilized egg, then so should any high risk behavior by the pregnant mother, such as smoking, drinking alcohol, taking certain (legal) drugs, living in structures with exposed asbstos, etc.
Hey, ya hit the nail on the head with these points. Exactly how I feel. Just a point tho, most people I know that are "cool" with in vitro have no idea that so many of the zygotes are destroyed in the process.
Prince Lucianus said:
Personally I think you can't be against abortion, but have no problem with killing cows (or other animals) who are more sentient than a foetus.
Cows are not sentient... period... they are not self aware, they do not actually "think" any more than to act apon instincts. To the best of my understanding there are no sentient life forms on earth besides human beings. I will agree tho that in many ways a vegitarian life style would be better for us in many ways, but I for one cannot afford to feed my family in that manner when more "conventional" means exist for 1/8th the price in my locality.
Prince Lucianus said:
So cutting down plants is wrong as well?
In this opinion, killing anything alive is inherently wrong.
If you agree to this, then I can agree with your statement. If you don't, then I don't get it.
No, killing human life (murder) is what is being argued as wrong. It is impossible to sustain life without destroying life in the process of creating useable resources (food). It is my opinion that you are thinking too hard so that you can justify your point.
Nycky said:
Define irresponsibility. Is contraceptive failure irresponsibility? I think not. Many abortions are a consequence of ignorance -- lack of information about contraception (getting it and using it,) to include not knowing under what circumstanecs contraception may be rendered ineffective.
If one does not know how to properly use the contraceptive, then yes it is irresponsibility in my opinion. What sexually active person does not know how to obtain a contraseptive? Sheesh... Also, if one is not prepared to handle the possible consequence of sex (procreation) wouldn't it be logical to abstain?
Nycky said:
Cancer is living cells. Should we not excise it because it lives.
While cancer may be living cells (and techincally living human cells, albeit damaged / mutated), cancer is not an example of a life form in and of itself. I think you are thinking too hard trying to find a way to justify your point.
I have chosen to remain out of the multi-page tirade regarding women's rape-rates and such as it holds no significant bearing on my feelings toward wrether women should be allowed to abort children from rape cases.
CrownCaster said:
Whatever has happened to a person, it is NEVER the baby' fault.
Agreed totaly.
PRINCESSOFCHRIST said:
To Me Abortion Is Murder Nobody Has The Right To Kill Something Created By God Except God He Is The Creator Of All Living Things
LOL I love it when people pop in to a thread long enough to spout out something as if it would make any difference. Troll...
pthalomarie said:
There is, actually, a fairly morbid argument that because an aborted infant would go straight to heaven, abortion guarantees their salvation, and is therefore compassionate in a perverse way.
Could you please offer some kind of reference to where you get this information... I've never known what to think about what happens to babies that die prior to birth...
I'll look thru the rest of this thread later, I'm at work and can't devote as much time as I'd like all at once to reading.
