Intelligent Falling

[daniel192]

I can't stand all of you Newtonians and your theory of gravity. We've never seen gravity happen. Newtonians and gravitationans have never proven gravity.
When people fall, it is because God is pushing them down.
Gravity is the most dangerous and dumbest religion on this planet.
On September the 11th, 2001, two planes were flown into the World Trade Center, killing 3000+ people. The hijackers were influenced by gravititionists because Newtonians had taught them that gravity made people fall and kill them.
The planets do not spin because of gravity, but because God does it. Black Holes are not "gravity" but gaps to heaven that God does not want you to enter. This is the most out dated theory and lie for the last 400 years.

This dangerous theory can now have an alternative.
We are trying to take out the Theory of Gravity and introduce a new way of learning why things fall.
Intelligent Falling leads those from the satanic path of gravity and leads them to the path of God and Intelligent Falling.



If you made it this far, THIS IS A SATIRE.

 

[tansy]

Well, of course we know we DO have intelligent falling ...when we use parachutes, bungees. Nobody with intelligence would fall on purpose without safeguarding themselves

 

[SkyWriting]

...it is because God is pushing them down.

If you made it this far, THIS IS SATIRE.

.

It's hard to imagine HOW ELSE space got bent. Who else has that strength?
Who else could spread out the heavens?
Who else could create life out of nothing but energy?

 

[daniel192]

Micro and macro gravity.
We see micro "gravity" happen, but we never see macro gravity happen.

2 questions for gravitationalists:
1. If apples fall, why do birds fly?

2. Why do objects with different mass fall at the same time?

 

[tansy]

1. If apples fall, why do birds fly?


Apples don't have wings..duh!

 

[Chesterton]

Everything we do - sitting, standing, walking, running and jumping - is in fact controlled falling, so in that sense, our interaction with gravity actually is intelligent falling.

To not engage in intelligent falling, i.e., to lay around all day on your back, probably should be considered satanic (sloth is a deadly sin).

 

[keith99]

I can't stand all of you Newtonians and your theory of gravity. We've never seen gravity happen. Newtonians and gravitationans have never proven gravity.
When people fall, it is because God is pushing them down.
Gravity is the most dangerous and dumbest religion on this planet.
On September the 11th, 2001, two planes were flown into the World Trade Center, killing 3000+ people. The hijackers were influenced by gravititionists because Newtonians had taught them that gravity made people fall and kill them.
The planets do not spin because of gravity, but because God does it. Black Holes are not "gravity" but gaps to heaven that God does not want you to enter. This is the most out dated theory and lie for the last 400 years.

This dangerous theory can now have an alternative.
We are trying to take out the Theory of Gravity and introduce a new way of learning why things fall.
Intelligent Falling leads those from the satanic path of gravity and leads them to the path of God and Intelligent Falling.



If you made it this far, THIS IS A SATIRE.

Did you put in the bolded part as an intentional reference to confusing ambiogenesis with evolution? Or was it a reference to something else, or even just a happy mistake?

 

[DaisyDay]

A few years back, scientists figured out the speed of gravity - that amazed me as I still can't quite grasp that it has a speed.

 

[SithDoughnut]

A few years back, scientists figured out the speed of gravity - that amazed me as I still can't quite grasp that it has a speed.

It doesn't have a speed. Scientists worked out the strength of gravity, which is expressed in terms of the speed which things fall in an airless environment.

That might make it a bit easier to grasp

 

[PhilosophicalBluster]

It's just too perfect to come about randomly! How else could 10 kg have an exact downward force of 98N? God obviously did it!

 

[AV1611VET]

I no more believe in Intelligent Falling than I do Intelligent Evolution (Theistic Evolution).

 

[Cabal]

I no more believe in Intelligent Falling than I do Intelligent Evolution (Theistic Evolution).

Diabolical Mimicry, yes, but wrong area.

It's a diabolical mimicry of intelligent design.

Actually, scratch that, ID is morally bankrupt enough to begin with.

 

[daniel192]

I no more believe in Intelligent Falling than I do Intelligent Evolution (Theistic Evolution).

Damn gravitationalist.

 

[Mystman]

According to gravitationalists, the earth's gravity is caused by all the atoms on the planet being clustered together in a sphere that when combined, apply a single net force to objects on the surface of said sphere.

This is a ridiculous concept. Try to follow my irrefutable math: The volume of a sphere is is proportional to it's radius to the power 3. The entire universe has a radius of 14 billion light years, or ~10^23 km. The earth has a radius of ~10^4 km. The radius of the universe is thus 10^19 times bigger, meaning that the portion of the universe that is filled with the earth is 10^-57

Now.. we have to believe that all the atoms in the earth gathered there by chance so that they can exert the gravitational force?

The earth weighs ~10^25 kg. Say that on average, 1 mole of atoms weighs 10 gram. So there are ~10^27 mole of atoms in the earth, or ~10^51 atoms.

So purely by chance, 10^51 atoms gathered in the location of the earth, while each atom only has a chance of 10^-57 of being there! The chance of this happening is (10^-57)^(10^51), a number which is so ridiculously small that Google calculator just gave up. It can not be true, it cannot have happened. Newtonianism is a myth, a false religion that is blind to the MATHEMATICAL IMPOSSIBILITY of their claims.

 

[daniel192]

According to gravitationalists, matter is attracted to other matter.
But then, why is the moon going away from the earth, not coming closer?
As you saw here, I just made the whole silly "theory" of gravity, fall apart.

 

[SkyWriting]

According to gravitationalists, matter is attracted to other matter.
But then, why is the moon going away from the earth, not coming closer?
As you saw here, I just made the whole silly "theory" of gravity, fall apart.

So how close was the moon 1 billion years ago?

 

[Agonaces of Susa]

Intelligent Falling

That's what Newtonian gravitation should be called.

"...lest the systems of the fixed stars should, by their gravity, fall on each other, he [God] hath placed those systems at immense distances from one another." -- Isaac Newton, mathematician, 1687

I can't stand all of you Newtonians and your theory of gravity.

Gravity is not a theory. Gravity is an ancient observation.

"The atoms, as their own weight bears them down...." -- Lucretius, philosopher poet, 54 B.C.

Newton had no theory of gravity.

"Newton attempted to explain the force of gravity on two hypotheses: the existence of a medium, or ether, and action at a distance. The first hypothesis he rejected as being physically absurd, the second as contrary to reason. Newton had, therefore, no theory of gravity." -- Melbourne G. Evans, physicist, 1958

Gravitation is the 17th century myth you are looking for.

"Since Newton announced his universal law of gravitation, scientists have accepted and educators taught it, and rarely has it been questioned. Occasionally one has the temerity to say that gravitation is a myth, an invented word to cover scientific ignorance." -- C.H. Kilmer, historian, October 1915

 

[Agonaces of Susa]

According to gravitationalists, matter is attracted to other matter.
But then, why is the moon going away from the earth, not coming closer?
As you saw here, I just made the whole silly "theory" of gravity, fall apart.

You are absolutely correct.

The Earth and moon do not fall on eachother as required by the 17th century myth of gravitation.

Rather the moon falls away from the Earth at the rate of 3.8 centimeters per year.

"The moon does not 'fall,' attracted to the earth from an assumed inertial motion along a straight line, nor is the phenomenon of objects falling in the terrestrial atmosphere comparable with the 'falling effect' in the movement of the moon, a conjecture which is the basic element of the Newtonian theory of gravitation." -- Immanuel Velikovsky, polymath, 1946

 

[Agonaces of Susa]

So how close was the moon 1 billion years ago?

"Currently, the moon is moving away from the Earth at such a great rate, that if you extrapolate back in time — the moon would have been so close to the Earth 1.4 billion years ago that it would have been torn apart by tidal forces (Slichter, 1963)." — Dennis J. McCarthy, geoscientist, 2003

"The implications of employing the present rate of tidal energy dissipation on a geological timescale are catastrophic. Around 1500 Ma the Moon would have been close to the Earth, with the consequence that the much larger tidal forces would have disrupted the Moon or caused the total melting of Earth's mantle and of the moon." -- George E. Williams, geologist/geophysicist, 2000

Therefore the moon was nowhere near the Earth 1 billion years ago.

The moon was captured recently within the memory of man.

"Capture of our Moon becomes the only option, it cannot have been created from the Earth." -- Wallace Thornhill, physicist, October 2000

"...the pre-Hellenic Pelasgian inhabitants of Arcadia called themselves Proselenes, because they boasted that they came into the country before the Moon accompanied the Earth. Pre-Hellenic and pre-lunarian were synonymous." -- Alexander Von Humboldt, naturalist, 1851

"We shall commence with a few of the principal passages from the ancients, which treat of the Proselenes. Stephanus of Byzantium (v. 'Apkas) mentions the logographs of Hippys of Rhegium, a contemporary of Darius and Xerxes, as the first who called the Arcadians proselenous. The scholiasts, ad Apollon. Rhod. IV 264 and ad Aristoph. Nub. 397, agree in saying, the remote antiquity of the Arcadians becomes most clear from the fact of their being called proselenoi. They appear to have been there before the Moon, as Eudoxus and Theodorus also say; the latter adds that it was shortly before the labours of Hercules that the Moon appeared. In the government of the Tegeates, Aristotle states that the barbarians who inhabited Arcadia were driven out by the later Arcadians before the Moon appeared, and therefore they were called proselenoi." -- Alexander Von Humboldt, naturalist, 1851

"The passages in Ovid as to the existence of the Arcadians before the Moon are universally known." -- Alexander Von Humboldt, naturalist, 1851

"In the remotest times, before the Moon accompanied the Earth, according to the mythology of the Muysca or Mozca Indians, the inhabitants of the plain of Bogota lived like barbarians, naked, without any form of laws or religious worship." --Alexander Von Humboldt, naturalist, Researches, 1814

"These were Arcadians of Evander's following, the so‑called Pre-Lunar people." -- Plutarch, historian, Moralia: The Roman Questions #76, 1st century

"The stars did not yet revolve in the heavens; the Danaides had not yet appeared, nor the race of Deucalion; the Arcadians alone existed, those of whom it is said that they lived before the Moon, eating acorns upon the mountains." -- Apollonios Rhodios, librarian, Argonautica, ~246 B.C.

 

[Chesterton]

Gravity is not a theory. Gravity is an ancient observation.

An even more ancient experience.