Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Mr. Clarke was 100% correct and inspired several variations.I like Arthur Clake's quote "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."
I got the complete set of Farscape series (DVD) for Christmas. This set is made by chemical processes and obey the laws of physics. Yet these laws by themself doesn't explain the actual data which produces images and sound on my HDTV.
Mr. Clarke was 100% correct and inspired several variations.
"Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced." -- Barry Gehm, biochemist, 1973
"What we can say is that magic anticipated modern science and technology." -- Georg Luck, historian, 1985
That was my reaction, probably with the acidity affecting surface tension and pushing the droplet along. Looks odd though. If you look at the droplet's route through the maze, it seems to head down one path and then double back, it tracks along one set of path three times. Should have followed the keep left rule.Cool, but is sounds like it's just sliding "downhill" where the hill is the dispersion of the acid level.
I'd imagine that if you had a graph of the PH level you could also see the maze path.
As anyone who ever seen Harry Potter knows that even magic runs on laws/rules. Some parts of quantum physics is stranger than any magic.Except both of these (and the guy repeating the first) misunderstood Clarke's statement. What Clarke meant was that sufficiently advanced technology will appear to be magic to people who do not have any concept about how such technology works or could possibly work.
The example usually given is the hypothetical of bringing a television backwards in time to, say, AD 1200. For practical reasons, suppose you ALSO bring a DVD player and a battery to power things. Show them the movie on the disc, and it'll look like magic to them. That's because they have no idea what electricity is, what plasma technology is, how you can put moving images and sound onto a piece of plastic (and what is plastic???)...
But none of that is magic to us. We understand plastics and electromagnetism very well. We understand how you can encode digital information onto a piece of plastic and have that decoded by laser technology and the decoded information translated into sound and light displayed through the television. It's not magic. It's science being applied.
As anyone who ever seen Harry Potter knows that even magic runs on laws/rules. Some parts of quantum physics is stranger than any magic.
Thus science is just the magic that we become familiar with. If Harry Potter world was real there is no doubt man would come up with some kind of explanation why the world is the way it is then slap on the word "science" on it.
__________________
To those who don't understand how it works.I like Arthur Clake's quote "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."
That.Except both of these (and the guy repeating the first) misunderstood Clarke's statement. What Clarke meant was that sufficiently advanced technology will appear to be magic to people who do not have any concept about how such technology works or could possibly work.
The example usually given is the hypothetical of bringing a television backwards in time to, say, AD 1200. For practical reasons, suppose you ALSO bring a DVD player and a battery to power things. Show them the movie on the disc, and it'll look like magic to them. That's because they have no idea what electricity is, what plasma technology is, how you can put moving images and sound onto a piece of plastic (and what is plastic???)...
But none of that is magic to us. We understand plastics and electromagnetism very well. We understand how you can encode digital information onto a piece of plastic and have that decoded by laser technology and the decoded information translated into sound and light displayed through the television. It's not magic. It's science being applied.
It doesn't have to.As anyone who ever seen Harry Potter knows that even magic runs on laws/rules.
This makes no different to the quote because it's not necessary what we know or don't know but rather a matter of prospective or how we see things.To those who don't understand how it works.
I'm not sure I agree with it, but that's a good point.This makes no different to the quote because it's not necessary what we know or don't know but rather a matter of prospective or how we see things.
Even if we today find an unknown device like Stargate which opens up a wormhole and have no idea how it works, people today would still see it as science while those in the past may see it as magic.
Well, in my case, it's more of a hope than a belief.Today a lot of people has a belief everything in the universe can be explain by human understanding ; everything can be explain away mechanical.( no doubt a lot of things can be explain mechanical) Even if we don't have the answer now someone in the future will find it.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-M-vnmejwXo
