• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

"Intelligent Chemistry"?

Agonaces of Susa

Evolution is not science: legalize creationism.
Nov 18, 2009
3,605
50
San Diego
Visit site
✟26,653.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Constitution
I like Arthur Clake's quote "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."
Mr. Clarke was 100% correct and inspired several variations.

"Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced." -- Barry Gehm, biochemist, 1973

"What we can say is that magic anticipated modern science and technology." -- Georg Luck, historian, 1985

"If technology is distinguishable from magic, it is insufficiently advanced." -- Gregory Benford, author, 1997
 
Upvote 0

RealityCheck

Senior Veteran
May 9, 2006
5,924
488
New York
✟38,538.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
I got the complete set of Farscape series (DVD) for Christmas. This set is made by chemical processes and obey the laws of physics. Yet these laws by themself doesn't explain the actual data which produces images and sound on my HDTV.

Yes, they do, actually, because if they didn't, there would be any images or sound on your HDTV. ;)
 
Upvote 0

RealityCheck

Senior Veteran
May 9, 2006
5,924
488
New York
✟38,538.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Mr. Clarke was 100% correct and inspired several variations.

"Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced." -- Barry Gehm, biochemist, 1973

"What we can say is that magic anticipated modern science and technology." -- Georg Luck, historian, 1985


Except both of these (and the guy repeating the first) misunderstood Clarke's statement. What Clarke meant was that sufficiently advanced technology will appear to be magic to people who do not have any concept about how such technology works or could possibly work.

The example usually given is the hypothetical of bringing a television backwards in time to, say, AD 1200. For practical reasons, suppose you ALSO bring a DVD player and a battery to power things. Show them the movie on the disc, and it'll look like magic to them. That's because they have no idea what electricity is, what plasma technology is, how you can put moving images and sound onto a piece of plastic (and what is plastic???)...

But none of that is magic to us. We understand plastics and electromagnetism very well. We understand how you can encode digital information onto a piece of plastic and have that decoded by laser technology and the decoded information translated into sound and light displayed through the television. It's not magic. It's science being applied.
 
Upvote 0

Assyrian

Basically pulling an Obama (Thanks Calminian!)
Mar 31, 2006
14,868
991
Wales
✟42,286.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Cool, but is sounds like it's just sliding "downhill" where the hill is the dispersion of the acid level.

I'd imagine that if you had a graph of the PH level you could also see the maze path.
That was my reaction, probably with the acidity affecting surface tension and pushing the droplet along. Looks odd though. If you look at the droplet's route through the maze, it seems to head down one path and then double back, it tracks along one set of path three times. Should have followed the keep left rule.
 
Upvote 0

tansy

Senior Member
Jan 12, 2008
7,027
1,331
✟50,979.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Hope this doesnt send this thread off-topic, but the question comes to mind..what actually IS intelligence? They seem to recognise different types of intelligence nowadays. I can't remember the categories exactly, but something like numerical intelligence, manual intelligence etc etc. Which is why, so Iunderstand, IQ tests only measure a certain type.
Do you think intelligence is 'pre-programmed', static, can be developed, or what?
Is intelligence when it comes down to it, instinct? What is already there? (As in birds building nests). Is the difference between birds and us, that they appear to instinctively know how to build nests, but we can observe that, and then copy them?
 
Upvote 0

Smidlee

Veteran
May 21, 2004
7,076
749
NC, USA
✟21,162.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Except both of these (and the guy repeating the first) misunderstood Clarke's statement. What Clarke meant was that sufficiently advanced technology will appear to be magic to people who do not have any concept about how such technology works or could possibly work.

The example usually given is the hypothetical of bringing a television backwards in time to, say, AD 1200. For practical reasons, suppose you ALSO bring a DVD player and a battery to power things. Show them the movie on the disc, and it'll look like magic to them. That's because they have no idea what electricity is, what plasma technology is, how you can put moving images and sound onto a piece of plastic (and what is plastic???)...

But none of that is magic to us. We understand plastics and electromagnetism very well. We understand how you can encode digital information onto a piece of plastic and have that decoded by laser technology and the decoded information translated into sound and light displayed through the television. It's not magic. It's science being applied.
As anyone who ever seen Harry Potter knows that even magic runs on laws/rules. Some parts of quantum physics is stranger than any magic.
Thus science is just the magic that we become familiar with. If Harry Potter world was real there is no doubt man would come up with some kind of explanation why the world is the way it is then slap on the word "science" on it.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Smidlee

Veteran
May 21, 2004
7,076
749
NC, USA
✟21,162.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Yes, they do, actually, because if they didn't, there would be any images or sound on your HDTV. ;)
The data (which has no mass) rides on some forum of physical mass (DVD) in which they become one. Copyright laws are designed to protect data/information/ideas that has no mass.
 
Upvote 0

Psudopod

Godspeed, Spacebat
Apr 11, 2006
3,015
164
Bath
✟26,638.00
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
In Relationship
As anyone who ever seen Harry Potter knows that even magic runs on laws/rules. Some parts of quantum physics is stranger than any magic.
Thus science is just the magic that we become familiar with. If Harry Potter world was real there is no doubt man would come up with some kind of explanation why the world is the way it is then slap on the word "science" on it.
__________________

Investigating how the world works and explaining it? That sounds like science to me! Why the quotation marks?
 
Upvote 0

Naraoia

Apprentice Biologist
Sep 30, 2007
6,682
313
On edge
Visit site
✟30,998.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
I like Arthur Clake's quote "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."
To those who don't understand how it works.

Except both of these (and the guy repeating the first) misunderstood Clarke's statement. What Clarke meant was that sufficiently advanced technology will appear to be magic to people who do not have any concept about how such technology works or could possibly work.

The example usually given is the hypothetical of bringing a television backwards in time to, say, AD 1200. For practical reasons, suppose you ALSO bring a DVD player and a battery to power things. Show them the movie on the disc, and it'll look like magic to them. That's because they have no idea what electricity is, what plasma technology is, how you can put moving images and sound onto a piece of plastic (and what is plastic???)...

But none of that is magic to us. We understand plastics and electromagnetism very well. We understand how you can encode digital information onto a piece of plastic and have that decoded by laser technology and the decoded information translated into sound and light displayed through the television. It's not magic. It's science being applied.
That.

As anyone who ever seen Harry Potter knows that even magic runs on laws/rules.
It doesn't have to.

People who invent magic systems for fantasy stories invent rules for them because a magic system without rules wouldn't make for a good story. "Anything is possible 'cause it's magic, except when I don't want it to" is a ham-handed way of plugging plot holes, and easily seems contrived.

What rules govern God's magic? ("Magic" here including all manner of supernatural acts/abilities - PLEASE don't get hung up on the word like some people do...)
 
Upvote 0

Smidlee

Veteran
May 21, 2004
7,076
749
NC, USA
✟21,162.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
To those who don't understand how it works.
This makes no different to the quote because it's not necessary what we know or don't know but rather a matter of prospective or how we see things.
Even if we today find an unknown device like Stargate which opens up a wormhole and have no idea how it works, people today would still see it as science while those in the past may see it as magic.
Today a lot of people has a belief everything in the universe can be explain by human understanding ; everything can be explain away mechanical.( no doubt a lot of things can be explain mechanical) Even if we don't have the answer now someone in the future will find it. This including human behavior as John Cleese clip makes note of: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-M-vnmejwXo
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Naraoia

Apprentice Biologist
Sep 30, 2007
6,682
313
On edge
Visit site
✟30,998.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
This makes no different to the quote because it's not necessary what we know or don't know but rather a matter of prospective or how we see things.
Even if we today find an unknown device like Stargate which opens up a wormhole and have no idea how it works, people today would still see it as science while those in the past may see it as magic.
I'm not sure I agree with it, but that's a good point.

Today a lot of people has a belief everything in the universe can be explain by human understanding ; everything can be explain away mechanical.( no doubt a lot of things can be explain mechanical) Even if we don't have the answer now someone in the future will find it.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-M-vnmejwXo
Well, in my case, it's more of a hope than a belief.

Though I wouldn't mind a bit of magic. Especially if I could use it ^_^
 
Upvote 0