Infinite monkey theorem vs first life

[SLP]

Evolutionists will not accept evidence

Have you presented any?

I must have missed it.

By the way - do not interpret creationist evidence being debunked as just not accepting it.

Generally, creationist "evidence" is just nitpicky (and usually dishonest) attacks on evolution, not actual evidence FOR creation.

 

[FrumiousBandersnatch]

I am not interested in convincing evolutionists. Mostly nothing will change their minds. There are exceptions like David Gelernter.

Is that the David Gelernter that "cannot accept" intelligent design?

 

[FrumiousBandersnatch]

If evolution is true, then your opinions are the result of random impulses without meaning. There is no right or wrong. Truth is whatever the individual deems it to be according to random mutations that have produced his or her brain and how it processes information. If evolution is true, all analysis is valid, all conclusions equally true or equally false. There are no absolutes. The murderer is no worse than the doctor and the doctor no better. Just a different set of gene patterns. The individual who hacks your bank and steals everything you have is just smarter than most. He gets rich with little risk of being caught. That's not evil, it is evolution at its finest. Funny how few people are evolutionists when it comes to living in the real world.

That's the sort of nonsense you get when you indiscriminately mix different levels of description and emergence - it makes as much sense to claim there's no such thing as temperature or pressure because it's just gas molecules moving around at random, or your car can't be solid because it's just quantum fields, man.

This from people who think you need an imaginary superbeing to tell you how to behave!