Infilitration Rule!

sentipente · Jul 18, 2007

TrustAndObey said:
You bet there's a payout...PEACE and Biblical principles.

There is lots of Peace in the cemetary. As for Biblical principles . . . it all depends on which hymnbook you are singing from, doesn't it.

TrustAndObey · Jul 18, 2007

You said if this group were in charge of the Plan of Salvation we'd all still be waiting (or something to that effect).

This forum has never really had a voice in what we want OUR rules to be. This is completely new to us and we started doing it wrong the first time because of that.

It's a learning process and even though I don't agree with some of the people that post here, I have grown to respect them for one reason or another, and I value what they say.

They didn't come in slamming everyone or they never would've lasted. We have mutual respect for each other, even if it doesn't always appear that way to outsiders.

sentipente · Jul 18, 2007

TrustAndObey said:
You said if this group were in charge of the Plan of Salvation we'd all still be waiting (or something to that effect).

I'm sorry if I struck a nerve.

RC_NewProtestants · Jul 18, 2007

What is wrong with you people. Can you not even discuss the rules without getting so upset and making accusations? If someone has been lurking and decides that they want to get involved why is that a problem? Do you not think that you can support the reason behind the rules you make?

Get real people. The only rules we need are those that make the forum run smoothly, we don't need rules about what one must or must not talk about. Yet that seems to be what the underlying concern of so many here is.

woobadooba · Jul 18, 2007

RC_NewProtestants said:
What is wrong with you people. Can you not even discuss the rules without getting so upset and making accusations? If someone has been lurking and decides that they want to get involved why is that a problem? Do you not think that you can support the reason behind the rules you make?

Get real people. The only rules we need are those that make the forum run smoothly, we don't need rules about what one must or must not talk about. Yet that seems to be what the underlying concern of so many here is.

RC, the person we are referring to is NightEternal, using another username. This is dishonest. He is pretending to be someone that he is not.

As a result of this, he has breached the confidence of this forum, and should not be allowed to participate in this process under either name.

If I am wrong I will repent. But the evidence is quite strong that I am not wrong!

sentipente · Jul 18, 2007

woobadooba said:
If I am wrong I will repent. But the evidence is quite strong that I am not wrong!

You are wrong, but I am not holding my breath for you to repent. This is truly pitiful.

TrustAndObey · Jul 18, 2007

I don't know who he is, but I just don't think it's right to let someone that doesn't really know what this forum has faced to get to help make the rules. In fact, he stated earlier he thinks we don't need rules.

My husband has posted here for a long time and I know his password. However, he is unavailable to vote.

If I were to use his password to vote, there are people here that I have confided in that would know I wasn't being totally honest (even though I know how he'd vote).

There are some things you just can't do and can't allow.

This has to be fair.

I'm asking Sentipente not to participate in making rules for this forum. If he chooses to anyway, that's his concern, but if it's going to be anarchy, what's to keep me from using my husband's account?

By the rules he fits into the category of getting to vote, I have a power of attorney for him to make his decisions, and I know how he'd vote.

We'd be cancelling each other's votes out I have a feeling, but if he's going to play dirty, so can I.

(I really don't want to though, that's the difference).

DarylFawcett · Jul 18, 2007

Woob,

Are you saying that NightEternal and sentipente are the same person? If yes, then how do you know that? Also, if that is true, isn't there a General CF rule against that? We have such a rule against that over at Maritime SDA OnLine.

JonMiller · Jul 18, 2007

I think that everyone should be allowed in the rule making process. We have to trust people, really.

Personally I am in favor of a low amount of rules also.

JM

TrustAndObey · Jul 18, 2007

The mods can find out if someone is using two names on this forum. Let's leave that up to them.

sentipente · Jul 18, 2007

DarylFawcett said:
Woob,

Are you saying that NightEternal and sentipente are the same person? If yes, then how do you know that? Also, if that is true, isn't there a General CF rule against that? We have such a rule against that over at Maritime SDA OnLine.

I'll say this once. I am not NightEternal and have never been. I actually apologize to him for whatever difficulty my appearance here may have caused him. As far as your rules are concerned I don't care about being a part of that process. From the evidence I would be better served doing something else, anyway.

NightEternal · Jul 18, 2007

Woobadooba, you are making a complete fool of yourself. I have no desire to dialogue in this forum, much less use clandestine means in order to help shape the rules here.

My goodbye post stands:

http://www.christianforums.com/t5238903-goodbye.html

I hope this settles the matter of secret identities. Sentipente is not me. I am not him. Kapiche?

DarylFawcett · Jul 18, 2007

TrustAndObey said:
The mods can find out if someone is using two names on this forum. Let's leave that up to them.

I agree completely.

DarylFawcett · Jul 18, 2007

sentipente,

I first welcomed you here and the welcome still stands on my part.

sentipente · Jul 18, 2007

NightEternal said:
I hope this settles the matter of secret identities. Sentipente is not me. I am not him. Kapiche?

I wish I was a young as NightEternal, though.

sentipente · Jul 18, 2007

DarylFawcett said:
sentipente,

I first welcomed you here and the welcome still stands on my part.

I just read NightEternal's goodbye post and it's sad. What has become of Christianity?

TrustAndObey · Jul 18, 2007

I love NightEternal, but this is about his 3rd goodbye already. Or maybe it's the same one I don't know. It is sad though.

Let's move on. Sentipente doesn't want to participate in the rules process, so it's over.

Distractions, distractions!

tall73 · Jul 18, 2007

TrustAndObey said:
I love NightEternal, but this is about his 3rd goodbye already. Or maybe it's the same one I don't know. It is sad though.

Let's move on. Sentipente doesn't want to participate in the rules process, so it's over.

Distractions, distractions!

Let's not go down that road. Woob has numerous goodbye's under his belt, from GT, from here, from the whole forums, etc.

It happens. People change their mind.

And this is the old goodbye that he referenced because you all were doubting his identity.

I hope you come back NE.

TrustAndObey · Jul 18, 2007

You've had a dramatic goodbye thread too Tall, and I agree, people change their minds and I'm always glad when they do.

You won't see one of those from me EVER. If I go, I'll go quietly.

sentipente · Jul 18, 2007

I am yet to understand how it is possible to "love" someone and participate in and encourage unfounded accusations about that person behind their back. Can I blame Jesus for this? After all, it was done in His name.

Infilitration Rule!

Senior Contributor

TrustAndObey

Guest

Senior Contributor

Senior Veteran

Legend

Senior Contributor

TrustAndObey

Guest

Ticket Support Manager

Senior Veteran

TrustAndObey

Guest

Senior Contributor

Evangelical SDA

Ticket Support Manager

Ticket Support Manager

Senior Contributor

Senior Contributor

TrustAndObey

Guest

Sophia7's husband

TrustAndObey

Guest

Senior Contributor

Similar threads

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency