Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Circumcision was a sign of the covenant that God made with Abraham.
In a similar way, baptism is a sign of the covenant God makes with us through Christ.
Hi. My question is just a simple one but with a long backstory.. I was baptized as an infant. I've always held this baptism as a true one based on this: I believe if you are baptized and later on decide to not follow God, your baptism is no longer valid. That being said, I believe in the opposite, if you decide to come to God after being baptized, your baptism is in fact, valid. I've also thought that the babies were dedicated in the Israelites' covenant after 8 days, and entire households were baptized in the New Testament. That being said, the church I belong to now believes my baptism is not valid by noting that in the New Testament, it is 'believe, then be baptized'. This obviously disturbs me because, does my baptism count? Do I need to be re-baptized? I don't know, and I've been following God for a while now and am scared that I've been following all this time but missing a step. I've always thought my baptism was valid until my pastor said it was not. Can somebody shine some light on this?
I go to a church that doesn't have a specific denomnation but clearly leans baptist. I'm posting it here as I do think it's a theology question, although it does fall under 'Christian Advice' as well.
So it grows back?
I think you're confusing something here--the condition of all of us before God and the other attributes that men may have.
When I pointed out that the Bible teaches that we are born in sin, I didn't suggest that this means every newborn is spoiling for trouble. It just means that we are not acceptable to God, in his justice, until redeemed.
Please explain how I am in error.You could say that...if you didn't take anything in the New Testament in to account.
Well, all babies have been redeemed in Christ, even those born to pagans, atheists etc. All infants belong to God and will be in the Kingdom of God [should they die before coming of age].
As I said, that's a fascinating theory, however unscriptural it may be.
So to speak. YES.
As infants are unable to understand the difference between good and evil, sin is not counted against them. However, once they reach an age when they are able to learn good from bad, the LORD expects them to come to Him.
Then Isaiah said, Hear now, you house of David! Is it not enough to try the patience of humans? Will you try the patience of my God also? Therefore the Lord himself will give you a sign: The virgin will conceive and give birth to a son, and will call him Immanuel. He will be eating curds and honey when he knows enough to reject the wrong and choose the right, for before the boy knows enough to reject the wrong and choose the right, the land of the two kings you dread will be laid waste. The Lord will bring on you and on your people and on the house of your father a time unlike any since Ephraim broke away from Judahhe will bring the king of Assyria. Isaiah 7:13-17
Please explain how I am in error.
That's rather bazaar. God circumcised and it grows back but when man does it, it does not grow back.
If understanding is a prerequisite of salvation, then we are all doomed as we see through that glass dimly.
Ahhh, the age of accountability. Scripture please.
Nope, I am not of the OSAS crowd.Oh, are you one of those folks who believe that once a person comes to Christ (is circumcised in the heart), they can never be lost again?
Consider how far you have fallen! Repent and do the things you did at first. If you do not repent, I will come to you and remove your lampstand from its place. Revelation 2:5
By the way, are you aware that though the Israelites were baptized in Christ during their exodus, God did not spare them for their sins? He destroyed them to set an example for us.
I've never claimed that it is "merely a sign." Perhaps you read something into my statement that wasn't actually there.Well, HK, there's quite a lot in the New Testament that teaches us that baptism is more than merely a sign of the new covenant. The NT teaches us that it forgives sin, imparts the Holy Ghost, makes us cleansed, alive, and changed, for instance.
First it wa not only infants. It was under the age of twenty. It was about who he did not permit. Those people of rebellion and doubt. those who had seen and did not believe.And the little ones that you said would be taken captive, your children who do not yet know good from bad--they will enter the land. I will give it to them and they will take possession of it. Deuteronomy 1:39
Why did God allow the infants to enter the promised land, but denied the same to most adults of Israel? Tell me if you know?
_________
Then Isaiah said, Hear now, you house of David! Is it not enough to try the patience of humans? Will you try the patience of my God also? Therefore the Lord himself will give you a sign: The virgin will conceive and give birth to a son, and will call him Immanuel. He will be eating curds and honey when he knows enough to reject the wrong and choose the right, for before the boy knows enough to reject the wrong and choose the right, the land of the two kings you dread will be laid waste. The Lord will bring on you and on your people and on the house of your father a time unlike any since Ephraim broke away from Judahhe will bring the king of Assyria. Isaiah 7:13-17
Nope, I am not of the OSAS crowd.
The Israelites were Baptized in Christ? I'm pretty sure Christ had not yet redeemed them. At best this was a picture of things to come. Like Abraham placing his son on the altar.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?