Indictment pattern continues

[Green Sun]

Ok, now this is just getting ridiculous.

For the fourth time, an indictment of former President Donald Trump came right around the time Hunter Biden got bad news.​

​

Either the two of them have their timelines intertwined by some “Twilight Zone” type phenomenon, or something is rotten in the state of our nation.​

​

March 16: Hunter Biden admits that the Biden family has made millions in deals with China — and a spokesman complains about a “wild and baseless right-wing conspiracy.”

March 17: News leaks of Trump’s first indictment by the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office, shifting the news cycle.

June 8: Republicans on the House Oversight Committee confirm the existence of an FBI FD-1023 file containing allegations about President Joe Biden’s involvement in Ukraine.​

​

June 9: Special counsel Jack Smith releases a grand jury indictment against Trump in a documents-related case.​

July 31: Devon Archer, a close business associate of Hunter Biden, testifies before the House Oversight Committee that Joe Biden, as vice president, was part of at least 20 business calls with Hunter Biden while associates were present.

August 1: Smith unveils Trump’s indictment related to the Capitol incursion of Jan. 6, 2021.

August 11: Attorney General Merrick Garland appoints a special counsel for the Hunter Biden case; Aug. 14: Fox releases report on Biden transition team being tipped to planned FBI interview with Hunter Biden.​

​

August 14: A Georgia grand jury indicts Trump for his statements about the 2020 election.​

As you know, Georgia's investigation into Trump's election fraud started over two years ago, in Georgia, right? And that back in May, the AG hinted that, if the Grand Jury found that charges could be brought, it would be in the first half of August, right?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...y-georgia-trump-investigation-charges-august/

The Atlanta-area district attorney investigating former president Donald Trump and his allies for potential election interference notified top county officials that most of her staff will work remotely for many days in the first three weeks of August, a signal she may file indictments in the high-profile case within that period.

So you're starting that back in May, the AG for Georgia was secretly planning to cut off news about a completely unrelated case from the federal court system that she wouldn't have known the details about since she doesn't work for the federal prosecutors?

Extraordinary claims require Extraordinary evidence. Please provide that.

I wish the conservative members of these fourms would be less blatant in their whataboutism. It feels like they get a pass.

 

[Always in His Presence]

If you don't trust the mainstream media, you should quit quoting them in the "Trump's Faith" thread as if the headlines are authoritative.

Thanks for the call out and complaint - anything on the topic of the thread?

 

[Always in His Presence]

I wish the conservative members of these fourms would be less blatant in their whataboutism. It feels like they get a pass.

You should take your issues up with the author of the article - my post was a quote.

 

[Green Sun]

You should take your issues up with the author of the article - my post was a quote.

The one-sided-whataboutism goes far beyond just that quote. It's a general observation I have about these forums.

Do you agree with the author?

 

[Always in His Presence]

The one-sided-whataboutism goes far beyond just that quote. It's a general observation I have about these forums.

Do you agree with the author?

Whataboutism is a common issue from both sides. Good observation, it happens all the time from both camps

 

[Green Sun]

Whataboutism is a common issue from both sides. Good observation, it happens all the time from both camps

So do you agree with the author of the article you provided or not?

If you do agree with their findings, then you should be willing to engage with the question I asked previously involving what the AG hinted at back in May in terms of the timeline for the indictment.

It's a core part of the discussion this thread is about - Since the author of the article is claiming that this was intentionally set up to distract from Hunter Biden's case, despite the fact that the August timeframe for if when the Grand Jury would finish up was expected back in May?

I'd appreciate it if you'd engage. I ask a question, then you don't really seem like you want to respond to it, despite it being about the thread's central topic. You made the thread, so I assume you're interested in discussing it.

 

[Always in His Presence]

I'd appreciate it if you'd engage. I ask a question, then you don't really seem like you want to respond to it, despite it being about the thread's central topic. You made the thread, so I assume you're interested in discussing it.

It certainly seems feasible.

 

[Pommer]

So do you agree with the author of the article you provided or not?

If you do agree with their findings, then you should be willing to engage with the question I asked previously involving what the AG hinted at back in May in terms of the timeline for the indictment.

It's a core part of the discussion this thread is about - Since the author of the article is claiming that this was intentionally set up to distract from Hunter Biden's case, despite the fact that the August timeframe for if when the Grand Jury would finish up was expected back in May?

I'd appreciate it if you'd engage. I ask a question, then you don't really seem like you want to respond to it, despite it being about the thread's central topic. You made the thread, so I assume you're interested in discussing it.

Horse—cart—horse.
The prosecutors’ have to “telegraph” their timelines, everybody know sorta when things are likely to drop; how best to mitigate “damage” and attempts to “control the narrative” is on the H. Biden investigators.

 

[The Barbarian]

And couldn't it be just as easily the other way around? Republicans catch wind of indictments and events coming down the pipe and rush to put out the next big ticket accusation against the president or his family just so the right-wing media can make the arguments being made in this thread? Maybe that's why most of their stuff isn't panning out the way they want. They're being sloppy and not really properly investigating anything. That's what happened with Archer. The guy flat out said on record that he was not aware of ANY impropriety by the president with regard to any of Hunter's and his business dealings. TOTALLY EXONERATED!! some might say, even.

Pretty much. Frantic spasms of whattaboutism.

 

[NxNW]

Now that Hunter is being indicted, and Trump hasn't had one for a little while, I guess that's proof the Trump indictments are a distraction.

Right?