• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

Incestuous behavior?

Does God approve of marrying in your own family?

  • Yes

  • No


Results are only viewable after voting.

Domenico

Sacrifice to the Gods of Speed
Jun 10, 2007
1,021
65
Dunedin, New Zealand
✟31,512.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Single
Politics
AU-Greens
Ishida, the thing that makes me laugh the most about those commandments is the way theyre set up means its totaly okay for a woman to sleep with her brother, uncle, father, other women etc...

Oh, and two couples wouldnt have preveted incest. The first generation would have been fine, they could marry into the other family (assuming there were an equal number of men and women) but the second generation would have all had to marry either their siblings or their cousins.
 
Upvote 0

Apollo Celestio

Deal with it.
Jul 11, 2007
20,734
1,429
38
Ohio
✟51,579.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Green
Wouldn't 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 16 fall under 6? Why the redundancy? And 12-13 is one person, she must be a big girl (that's OK I have an aunt like that too). Oh and cute how you threw in the Mohamed thing, not relevant at all to this thread but it always strengthens one's own faith to tear down the faith of others doesn't it?
Who am I tearing at? It was a question. But glad you noticed. ;)
 
Upvote 0

Apollo Celestio

Deal with it.
Jul 11, 2007
20,734
1,429
38
Ohio
✟51,579.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Green
Ishida, the thing that makes me laugh the most about those commandments is the way theyre set up means its totaly okay for a woman to sleep with her brother, uncle, father, other women etc...

Oh, and two couples wouldnt have preveted incest. The first generation would have been fine, they could marry into the other family (assuming there were an equal number of men and women) but the second generation would have all had to marry either their siblings or their cousins.
Take it up with the Jews, I merely copied the scripture.
 
Upvote 0

dinonum

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Mar 4, 2005
5,189
273
37
Indiana
✟74,804.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I used to really struggle with it, but let me explain something.

Incest didn't really exist until a long while after Adam and Eve helped populate the earth. I have a personal belief that God didn't allow for "defects" until after He made clear that He didn't want people to have relations inside close family anymore.
 
Upvote 0

The Nihilist

Contributor
Sep 14, 2006
6,074
490
✟31,289.00
Faith
Atheist
I used to really struggle with it, but let me explain something.

Incest didn't really exist until a long while after Adam and Eve helped populate the earth. I have a personal belief that God didn't allow for "defects" until after He made clear that He didn't want people to have relations inside close family anymore.

You know that's ridiculous, right?
 
Upvote 0

Domenico

Sacrifice to the Gods of Speed
Jun 10, 2007
1,021
65
Dunedin, New Zealand
✟31,512.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Single
Politics
AU-Greens
Take it up with the Jews, I merely copied the scripture.
Domenico: Hey, Duvid! The book of Leviticus has some really silly, sexist rules in it.
Duvid (Jew): Thats because they didnt need to worry about women reading it, given most people couldn't read, and that went doubly so for women. Doesn't mean theyre not silly though.
Domenico: Oh yeah, I get that. Hey Duvid! You want some crayfish?
Duvid: You want a beating?

So, I asked the Jews. Or at least, A Jew.
 
Upvote 0

violetchick

Do you believe it in your head?
Feb 26, 2006
69
11
✟22,744.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
UK-Labour
From an atheist perspective, yes. Unfortunately, the whole idea of God is also ridiculous too, so I don't see what it matters.
But you're basically saying that God issued birth defects when he decided that maybe incest was a bad idea after all.
That does seem ridiculous. And when did he change his unchanging mind then?
 
Upvote 0

dinonum

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Mar 4, 2005
5,189
273
37
Indiana
✟74,804.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
But you're basically saying that God issued birth defects when he decided that maybe incest was a bad idea after all.
That does seem ridiculous. And when did he change his unchanging mind then?
Well, no, that is what you chose to take from what I said. Actually I think that God may have decided that relations within a close family were no longer necessary to populate the earth. I don't think He "changed his mind", He is allowed to plan ahead, lol.
 
Upvote 0

violetchick

Do you believe it in your head?
Feb 26, 2006
69
11
✟22,744.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
UK-Labour
Well, no, that is what you chose to take from what I said. Actually I think that God may have decided that relations within a close family were no longer necessary to populate the earth. I don't think He "changed his mind", He is allowed to plan ahead, lol.
So he decided that the best way to stop the previously ok incest was to start giving children birth defects?

Nice.
 
Upvote 0

dinonum

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Mar 4, 2005
5,189
273
37
Indiana
✟74,804.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
So he decided that the best way to stop the previously ok incest was to start giving children birth defects?

Nice.
I will honestly let you know that I don't have any real ability to explain why God does what He does, but here is my attempt at some kind of reasoning.

Parents do this to their children a lot, heck, I know of a lot of young teens or pre-teens whose parents let them have a Myspace when they thought it was okay. Eventually they would decide that it wasn't okay and they didn't want their children to use it anymore. So, parents were punishing their children when they found out that they were going ahead and doing it.
Deciding that something is not alright anymore and setting forth a punishment for people still doing that action doesn't make someone horrible, so why is it okay to use that on God?
 
Upvote 0

tulc

loves "SO'S YER MOM!! posts!
May 18, 2002
49,401
18,805
70
✟286,610.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Parents do this to their children a lot, heck, I know of a lot of young teens or pre-teens whose parents let them have a Myspace when they thought it was okay. Eventually they would decide that it wasn't okay and they didn't want their children to use it anymore. So, parents were punishing their children when they found out that they were going ahead and doing it.
Deciding that something is not alright anymore and setting forth a punishment for people still doing that action doesn't make someone horrible, so why is it okay to use that on God?

MySpace causes birth defects? :sorry:
tulc(sorry! couldn't resist, bad tulc, no doughnut!) :(
 
Upvote 0

ReverendDG

Defeater of Dad and AV1611VET
Sep 3, 2006
2,548
124
46
✟25,901.00
Faith
Pantheist
Politics
US-Others
I will honestly let you know that I don't have any real ability to explain why God does what He does, but here is my attempt at some kind of reasoning.

Parents do this to their children a lot, heck, I know of a lot of young teens or pre-teens whose parents let them have a Myspace when they thought it was okay. Eventually they would decide that it wasn't okay and they didn't want their children to use it anymore. So, parents were punishing their children when they found out that they were going ahead and doing it.
Deciding that something is not alright anymore and setting forth a punishment for people still doing that action doesn't make someone horrible, so why is it okay to use that on God?
the problem with your comparison is christians say god never changes. while parents are never expected to keep the same rules they make.
god seems to be claimed to keep his laws the same forever even though he does change them.
incest is a good example of this, also the flood is as well

if people didn't claim he never changes his law, it wouldn't be a big deal but people do claim this. so it seems inconstant
 
Upvote 0

dinonum

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Mar 4, 2005
5,189
273
37
Indiana
✟74,804.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
MySpace causes birth defects? :sorry:
tulc(sorry! couldn't resist, bad tulc, no doughnut!) :(
Lol, I'm not that big on examples having to be "comparable". I guess I'm not that picky, lol, no offense.
 
Upvote 0

dinonum

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Mar 4, 2005
5,189
273
37
Indiana
✟74,804.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
the problem with your comparison is christians say god never changes. while parents are never expected to keep the same rules they make.
god seems to be claimed to keep his laws the same forever even though he does change them.
incest is a good example of this, also the flood is as well

if people didn't claim he never changes his law, it wouldn't be a big deal but people do claim this. so it seems inconstant
God didn't have to change. He could have easily planned from the beginning to do that.

Also, you seem to be concerned with what people say, but what people say doesn't really matter. Personally I believe God is, whether or not it makes sense to you, changing and yet unchanging. I understand that a lot of God seems very paradoxical to especially atheists, but I think that God isn't meant to be fully understood by us now.

I always have problems with this because for me it is extremely difficult to discuss the complexities of God over the internet, so you'll have to please excuse me if some of the things I say don't necessarily make "sense".
 
Upvote 0