- May 14, 2015
- 7,498
- 157
- 45
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Female
- Faith
- Other Religion
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Others
This is inspired by a thread I saw on another forum about unnatural haircolors (pink, green, blue, etc).The general consensus (among this particular group of people) was that unnatural haircolors were, indeed, very sinful because it creates a distraction and makes someone look rebellious and wordly; however, there was one response that was a bit odd. The poster said that unnatural hair colors were "immodest" When questioned about what he meant by "immodest" he stated that we are to show outward countenance and the spirit of the Lord which is only evident in the face and when someone does something odd to their hair, it draws attention away from their face. He even went so far as to say that highlights are a little bit immodest, but that totally unnatural haircolors (such as pink or blonde with bright colored highlights) are "completely immoral".
Going by the logic that any outer adornment that takes attention away from the face is sinful and immodest, would the following be immodest:
1. Braces to correct crooked teeth?
2. A neon colored cast after breaking a bone?
3. A modest, full-length dress with a large floral print?
4. A sparkly hair clip?
5. A really trendy hairstyle?
6. Unique looking shoes?
Going by the logic that any outer adornment that takes attention away from the face is sinful and immodest, would the following be immodest:
1. Braces to correct crooked teeth?
2. A neon colored cast after breaking a bone?
3. A modest, full-length dress with a large floral print?
4. A sparkly hair clip?
5. A really trendy hairstyle?
6. Unique looking shoes?
