[/list]Heres the point... relying on what it says in Genesis ISN'T SCIENCE!!!!!!!!!!!!
Our single candidate "creation science" syllabus is really nothing more than a rewriting of the Bible in science-speak.
Au contraire.
Since science has a word for what we call miracles (i.e. "singularity") - that makes the Bible a "book of singularities" - which makes it very scientific.
Au contraire.
Since science has a word for what we call miracles (i.e. "singularity") - that makes the Bible a "book of singularities" - which makes it very scientific.
So any religion with miracles (which is almost all of them) is scientific? Zeus creating lightning is scientific since it is a "singularity".
"Singularity" and "miracle" are not synonyms.
Regardless of your semantic games, I do not have a problem with all authority. Do you have a problem with autocracy? Would you submit to a dictator? If not, using your semantics, then you have a problem with authority. (catch my drift?I didn't say you "reject all authority" --- I said you have a "problem with authority".
Not a problem --- you wanted a syllabus on "the Bible in science-speak" --- and you got one.
Well, singularities can be explained, and more importantly OBSERVED... but Genesis "miracles" can't be
Regardless of your semantic games, I do not have a problem with all authority.
nvxploorer said:Do you have a problem with autocracy? Would you submit to a dictator? If not, using your semantics, then you have a problem with authority. (catch my drift?)
No, you're having difficulty admitting what you wrote. If I say "you don't like Chevys," I am implying that you dislike all Chevys. Showing that you drive (and enjoy) a Cobalt, for example, disproves my statement "you don't like Chevys," regardless of your opinion on the rest of the Chevrolet fleet. Likewise, having a problem with certain types of authority does not equate to having a problem with "authority." Since you did not specify any particular type of authority, your use of the word is all-inclusive. All I have to show is that I accept certain types of authority to disprove your statement.Once again, I didn't say you did. You're the one who changed the wording of my post, not I. That makes you the one playing games.
Tell me, do you have a problem with autocracy? Would that mean you "have a problem with authority?"Ya --- real cute.
To some of us humans AV, the concept of eternally torturing people is evil. It's called morality.Ya --- I can tell.
The problem with most people is not Bible interpretation --- it's authority.
Please give me an example of an observed singularity that isn't a miracle.
Lot of astro physicists will disagree, they have pretty firm estimates of the amount of energy required to create a singularity. They are large amounts, sure... but not divine, by any stretch of the imagination.Only God can "repeat a singularity".
You have been called stupid and other names, but yet you never responded in kind. That is what being a christian is about, not attacking others to make a point. The more you posted, the more you were attacked.
Unless you swear to me on a stack of Bibles that you will never submit to any medical treatment ever again, then YOU sir, are a hypocriteI will take the Bibe first and science second.
Then what does this thread (of all threads) have to offer you?
Your opinion is not a problem --- however, if you came to my class with that attitude --- and stuck to it demonstrably --- I'd fail you in a heartbeat.
If fact, you'd probably last about two days tops.
I couldn't care less if you agreed with what I taught --- just learn it --- and learn it quietly --- or pack out.
No student would ever take your class. No one wants to be fed lies by a teacher who knows less than the students.
If you are miserable, then who really cares about science if all this learning makes you so unhappy . I will take the Bibe first and science second.
To some of us humans AV, the concept of eternally torturing people is evil.
For one thing, a miracle (an event brought about by a sentient being which is counter to the laws of physics) is not a singularity (a region where the curvature of space-time is infinitely high). The two are not equal. No singularities are miraculous, since all singularities are perfectly in accordance with the general theory of relativity, and no miracles are singularities, since any hypothetical miracle would have to go outside the bounds of all known physical laws, and singularities, as I've said, are all within general relativity.Au contraire.
Since science has a word for what we call miracles (i.e. "singularity") - that makes the Bible a "book of singularities" - which makes it very scientific.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?