If you do not purge the old, how can the new take hold?

[OldWiseGuy]

No, you say that the weight of evidence favours purposeful creation, and yet you have never once shown any evidence for creation, at all.

Study of anatomy confirms creation.

 

[OldWiseGuy]

No, you don't. If you really did then you would put in the work required to understand it to the depth you demand. You won't put in that work for yourself, so I am assuredly not going to put in that effort for you, only to have it ignored by you and to have serious answers treated with contempt.

We're done.

I thought the one making the assertion was obligated to prove it? You are asking me to prove your case.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Study of anatomy confirms creation.

So you say. But you've not once presented any way to prove you right or to actually show creation.

You really should be more honest and just admit "My study of anatomy confirms creation for me".

 

[Ophiolite]

I thought the one making the assertion was obligated to prove it? You are asking me to prove your case.

Quit your immature goading. You know perfectly well that is not what I am doing.

 

[OldWiseGuy]

So you say. But you've not once presented any way to prove you right or to actually show creation.

You really should be more honest and just admit "My study of anatomy confirms creation for me".

Isn't that who we're trying to convince?

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Isn't that who we're trying to convince?

... what?

 

[OldWiseGuy]

Quit your immature goading. You know perfectly well that is not what I am doing.

You are saying that if I study it long enough and hard enough I'll have to believe it. But nothing I've read comes close to answering my questions.

 

[OldWiseGuy]

... what?

I accept that anatomy confirms creation to me only. I'm not concerned with what others believe.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

You are saying that if I study it long enough and hard enough I'll have to believe it. But nothing I've read comes close to answering my questions.

If you were taken back in time in a time machine, and you got to witness evolution of the sort you ask for happen (obviously not in real-time since that'd be millennia), would you accept evolution as fact?

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

I accept that anatomy confirms creation to me only. I'm not concerned with what others believe.

So why do you keep saying that anatomy confirms creation then, and not just say that it only confirms creation for yourself?

 

[Ophiolite]

You are saying that if I study it long enough and hard enough I'll have to believe it. But nothing I've read comes close to answering my questions.

Come on. Now you are just deliberately goading. I gave a detailed explanation as to why your study would not you require to believe the theory. Frankly, if you can't be bothered to read what I write, or if you choose to pretend I didn't say it, then your goading has worked. I won't waste any more breath dealing with your snide ignorance.

 

[OldWiseGuy]

Come on. Now you are just deliberately goading. I gave a detailed explanation as to why your study would not you require to believe the theory. Frankly, if you can't be bothered to read what I write, or if you choose to pretend I didn't say it, then your goading has worked. I won't waste any more breath dealing with your snide ignorance.

Suits me as well.

 

[AV1611VET]

So you say. But you've not once presented any way to prove you right or to actually show creation.

You really should be more honest and just admit "My study of anatomy confirms creation for me".

Would you like to see my fps challenge, where I try to get an honest academic to admit the fossil record shows instant arrival of genera?

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Would you like to see my fps challenge, where I try to get an honest academic to admit the fossil record shows instant arrival of genera?

Not interested in the slightest.

 

[AV1611VET]

Not interested in the slightest.

Didn't think so.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Didn't think so.

No, it's because your challenges are bunk.

 

[OldWiseGuy]

No, it's because your challenges are bunk.

Isn't it true that many critters appeared suddenly in the fossil record with no evidence of evolutionary ancestors? Isn't T-Rex one? Just asking.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Isn't it true that many critters appeared suddenly in the fossil record with no evidence of evolutionary ancestors? Isn't T-Rex one? Just asking.

Not at all. You've been told this many times now.

 

[AV1611VET]

Would you like to see my fps challenge, where I try to get an honest academic to admit the fossil record shows instant arrival of genera?

Not interested in the slightest.

Didn't think so.

No, it's because your challenges are bunk.

Hmmm ... sounds to me like someone is bias.

Ain't seen my thread ... yet it's "bunk."

Interesting.

 

[OldWiseGuy]

Not at all. You've been told this many times now.

That's not the impression I get from reading about the Cambrian Explosion. They still haven't sorted that out.