I've looked at all the photos any creationist has posted on it and I've never seen anything that is clearly a human foot.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
The first link doesn't show the man footprint at the tip )but touching the center/big toe of) the Dino print. They left that one out- and it is clearly a man's footprint (perfect shape). But it, too, was in Texas. This is often what we see when someone is unwilling to show all of the evidence. And maybe both sides do it.
I would agree with you on matters of science. However, I was responding to a post about theology.Cearbhall, you live by absolute truth every day. Why would you say there isn't such a thing?
The first two sentences had truth ,but the lsat two lost the way .I believe that there is absolute truth but man being finite can not understand it. We understand that it has to be absolute but we can not grasp it in its entirety. Is there one God? Are there many? What difference does it make? If there was more than one God would their goals for us be different than if there was only one God?
The first part is correct that when we were with God in the beginning, we knew the truth (it was not theology but) within us.That it is one approach to the oneness of religion known as perennialism, based on the premise that the true theology was taught in the beginning and has been gradually eroded. The Baha'i approach is very different. We believe that God revealed Himself progressively to various peoples in accordance with the age and needs in which they lived. The Tabernacle of Unity is an interesting dialogue between Manakji Limji Hataria, a Zoroastrian perennialist and Baha'u'llah. http://reference.bahai.org/en/t/b/TU/
Agreed ,there are always some humans to whom God can reveal Himself ,as HeEven partially defined? I don't think anyone is claiming to define God wholly.
It is true that cares most about the state of our heart ,for it is through the heart He enters in and one thing that He most cares about is that we seek Him . In certain societies at any given time Christianity might not be available and so people will be judged by how they search .Lifelong atheism shows that God has not entered in intoI've noticed that claims of answered prayers, miracles, changed lives, and so on are present in many different religions. Those claims are where I personally would search for evidence of God, but they are present in religions with contradictory theologies.
It seems that either God exists and doesn't care too much about our particular choice of religion, or God doesn't exist in any way that is relevant to humans. If God doesn't care, then atheism makes the most sense to me. Of course most religions don't share my opinion.
For example Paul, Corinthians, speaks of a war in the OT. What Paul says, 23,000 men fail, was incorrect. The number was 24,000 according to the OT. These kinds of mistakes/errors have no effect on the message or meaning of the Bible. He simply got his figures wrong- as all humans do from time to time. But when it comes to the meaning or the message of the Bible there are no mistakes, contradictions or errors when viewed in context.
I.Lifelong atheism shows that God has not entered in into
the person because their level cynicism is too great;there are of course plenty of religious atheists wherein God does not dwell .
In fact, there are footprints (Texas, for one place) that have both Dino footprints and man's in the same rock strata.
http://www.paleo.cc/paluxy/mantrack.htm
http://www.paleo.cc/paluxy/stegosaur-claim.htm
With 100% more science than the claims of creationists.
Actually these were almost certainly not human footprints. Some of the tracks were fake, carved by locals to sell. They do not represent the way human footprints would look when walking in mud; they are too big for humans and even if we posit that they were made by some human giant they do not accurately reflect the changes in the way giant humans would walk as a result of their size. Other footprints were genuine tracks, but not human ones. Glen Kuban studied these genuine prints in 1986 and determined they were made by bipedal dinosaurs with three toes.
Ancient aliens? What kind of show is this?
Check out the link I just posted or look up the series 'Ancient Aliens and Dinosaurs'. The footprints are perfect- both the man's and the dinosaur's. That is proof they both existed at the same time as the Bible states in Job. Also, the 2nd link LoAmmi posted was about Dinos. The blogger/poster tried to say the pic wasn't a Stegosaur. Problem is he used to many "possibly', 'maybes', and 'may have'. A trick/tool the evolutionists 'always' use.
Evolution predicted that life would fall into a nested Hierarchy and by examining the fossil record we can see they were right on the money. In fact I have heard no other explanation as to why the fossil record would show this trend there are many other pieces of evidence to be sure men spend their whole lives studying the phenomenon of evolution.
So it is the contention of creationists that stegosaurus dinosaurs were around in the 12th century?
So they didn't know if they had eaten the Passover Seder or not the night before? Sorry, but that's not something I could go along with. In fact, the more hoops you need to jump though to explain it, the more implausible it becomes.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?