Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
If there is no evidence for creation...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Pwnzerfaust" data-source="post: 48003632" data-attributes="member: 212375"><p>What weak argument?</p><p> </p><p></p><p></p><p>Pretty much, yeah. But why does he want to "judge" people? Is he a sadist?</p><p> </p><p></p><p></p><p>Naturally, if I was absolutely sure it was god.</p><p> </p><p></p><p></p><p>Argumentum ad populum is a logical fallacy. Just because many people believe does not necessarily make it so.</p><p> </p><p></p><p></p><p>Sure, of course he's mentioned. But his existence does not mean he was the son of your god. And of course there's no proof for evolution. Proofs are the realm of math and alcohol. But evolution is supported by mountains of evidence.</p><p> </p><p></p><p></p><p>Naturally, but if there is no evidence, there is no reason to believe something.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I've heard them mentioned. I'll take a look into what they are.</p><p> </p><p></p><p></p><p>Irreducible complexity, eh? Lemme guess, you're gonna say the bacterial flagellar motor.</p><p> </p><p></p><p></p><p>Lol, no. Everything that supports an old earth (geology, astronomy, cosmology, biology, physics) goes against your little theology.</p><p> </p><p></p><p></p><p>Sounds like a stupid reason to believe anything.</p><p> </p><p></p><p></p><p>Again, argumentum ad populum is a logical fallacy. Simply because many people believe something does not make it true.</p><p> </p><p></p><p></p><p>I'll throw my lot in with science, thanks.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Pwnzerfaust, post: 48003632, member: 212375"] What weak argument? Pretty much, yeah. But why does he want to "judge" people? Is he a sadist? Naturally, if I was absolutely sure it was god. Argumentum ad populum is a logical fallacy. Just because many people believe does not necessarily make it so. Sure, of course he's mentioned. But his existence does not mean he was the son of your god. And of course there's no proof for evolution. Proofs are the realm of math and alcohol. But evolution is supported by mountains of evidence. Naturally, but if there is no evidence, there is no reason to believe something. I've heard them mentioned. I'll take a look into what they are. Irreducible complexity, eh? Lemme guess, you're gonna say the bacterial flagellar motor. Lol, no. Everything that supports an old earth (geology, astronomy, cosmology, biology, physics) goes against your little theology. Sounds like a stupid reason to believe anything. Again, argumentum ad populum is a logical fallacy. Simply because many people believe something does not make it true. I'll throw my lot in with science, thanks. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
If there is no evidence for creation...
Top
Bottom