Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Will do.Please do because I am genuinely curious by this idea because, as I said, it is frankly rude and invasive.
Will do.
I'll let you know what he says.
And no, I don't think it's "rude and invasive" to pray for someone's salvation; whether said person is alive or dead.
Romans 10:1 Brethren, my heart's desire and prayer to God for Israel is, that they might be saved.
If you want to make yourself look sillyMaybe I should start another ATHEIST NIGHTMARE thread and post the Lady Hope story.
What do you think?
Ok. So point out what i got wrongYou are mostly correct.
Ok. So point out what i got wrong
And you are once again back to claiming that the Earth is Flat. The KJV is not the best translation, why give it more credence than other more recent and more accurate works? That smacks of idolatry.I'll enumerate them for ease of answering:
[Dan] But there is more though.
1. You do believe that having him reconvert back to christianity, would somehow invalidate all his research and observations.
2. You do believe that he renounced his work as a biologist as well.
3. And you believe that the whole of evolutionary biology rests on Darwin being an atheist.
4. A position refuted by every fact, but which creationists still cling to.
Am I correct in this? Or am I mistaken? [/Dan]
1. Where his research and observations differ from the King James Bible, his research and observations are wrong.
2. If he did, I'm not aware of it; but I'll take a guess and say he denied most of it.
3. Nope.
4. I disagree.
And yet his results are verified by modern testing.I'll enumerate them for ease of answering:
1. Where his research and observations differ from the King James Bible, his research and observations are wrong.
.
Alas, he never did any such thing.2. If he did, I'm not aware of it; but I'll take a guess and say he denied most of it.
Warden, after talking with my pastor, he says it's okay to pray the way I do it.
CORRECT: LORD, I pray Charles Darwin got saved before he died.
INCORRECT: LORD, I pray Charles Darwin gets saved.
The first prayer is just a general statement about how one feels in his heart about souls.
The second prayer is a plea that amounts to praying for the dead, which is unscriptural.
Neither prayer is doctrinal.
Their "journal" went belly up, as did their "research" institute...It's been a while since I looked at the status of the Discovery Institute but I recall it was in some financial difficulty. Public interest in ID appears to have evaporated.
1. Clearly articulate your theological issues with evolutionary science.
That your #1 posits theological issues with science is a non-starter.
Who cares what anyone's religious gripes about things they do not understand/were brainwashed into rejecting are?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?