Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Just as you said you were an Atheist born in an Atheist family? I am the opposite; I was Christian for many years; born in a Christian family. As far as testing the things as stated in the Bible, all I can say is it doesn't work for me. I can't speak for you or anybody else; but as for myself; it doesn't work.Will it be more convincing for me to show you some form of substantiation, or for you to seek and test the things stated in the Bible by yourself?
Whether testing works depends on the things you are testing and the attitude you use in testing. The things I am referring to that people should test and seek for themselves are the things God have already revealed in the Bible, and they are primarily concerned with God's message of salvation and His Kingdom.Just as you said you were an Atheist born in an Atheist family? I am the opposite; I was Christian for many years; born in a Christian family. As far as testing the things as stated in the Bible, all I can say is it doesn't work for me. I can't speak for you or anybody else; but as for myself; it doesn't work.
K
Would it be easier for you to understand if I said even though I dont believe in Santa Clause, I would describe him as a fat man who wears a red suit, rides a magic flying sleigh pulled by 8 reindeer; and live in the North Pole. And the reason I describe him that way is because the people that believe in him, and the stories and books written about him describe him that way?Confused is perhaps the wrong word ... perplexed maybe ? At first glance it seems counterintuitive for an atheist to be defining a god they claim doesn't exist. It would be like someone who doesn't believe in Bigfoot saying, "I don't believe Bigfoot exists. But Bigfoot likes bananas, otherwise he's not Bigfoot." How would you know ? " If your answer is more or less, "Well that's what others told me," then I'm still somewhat perplexed why you would claim such a thing about Bigfoot while simultaneously claiming there is no Bigfoot.
I grew up in and currently live in a society of where over 90% of the people believe in God as described in the bible.You never said the society in which you grew up in, you said the society in which you live. What is the society in which you live ?
My point exactly; it would be impossible for you to prove me wrong, thus it would be futile for you to try to dispute me on that particular claim.And how could I possibly prove that every member of the society in which you live, or grew up in, defines god precisely the way you would claim they do ? To prove such a thing would be difficult, as I'd have to poll each and every individual you would consider part of your "society".
I would not. I would only include the people I have direct contact with on a consistent basis as a part of my societyPersonally, I would include the people you interact with daily on the internet as part of your society in some form or fashion.
Society is a rather vague term in this context; but I grew up in a Christian home; a very religious family so the vast majority of the people I had direct contact with had a very strong Christian POV, thus the people I had direct and consistent contact with while growing up were for the most part Christian; and even today most of the people who are religious that I have contact with are usually Christian.So if you want to continue the "society" route, you should probably define what you mean by "society", since we are no longer humans living in isolated pockets.
No! I defined Santa Clause as well! I dont believe in him either, even though my definition may slightly differ from someone else who might actually believe.But you seem to be defining it as well. Esp from my perspective, since your own definition involves something which mine doesn't, which even you refer to as "common sense". By the rationale you just proposed, does that mean you believe in God since you define "God" ?
Comparing Santa Claus to God is apples and oranges. Santa Claus has more modern origins as to the concept of Santa Claus, and is in general more streamlined and less diverse in the variations of Santa Claus. "God" as a concept is loaded, vague, and can mean anything from jackal headed human hybrids to an Omega Point civilization. Even with someone saying, "I'm Christian" it is loaded and may be vague. However the rest of your response here is showing me where your ideas come from I believe, so I'll try to skip to that ...Would it be easier for you to understand if I said even though I don’t believe in Santa Clause, I would describe him as a fat man who wears a red suit, rides a magic flying sleigh pulled by 8 reindeer; and live in the North Pole. And the reason I describe him that way is because the people that believe in him, and the stories and books written about him describe him that way?
Does that make sense to you or are you still …..perplexed???
Again, it would be up to you to prove your claim, not for me to disprove it. However if you define society as only those people whom you interact with on a consistent basis ... that's discounting billions and billions of people on the earth, not to mention millions that influence your life (I'm assuming you don't grow your own food, make your own clothes, are a webmaster at the sites you use, etc and so forth). But I'm not actually interested in you proving your claim, so I'll drop that point.I grew up in and currently live in a society of where over 90% of the people believe in God as described in the bible.
My point exactly; it would be impossible for you to prove me wrong, thus it would be futile for you to try to dispute me on that particular claim.
I would not. I would only include the people I have direct contact with on a consistent basis as a part of my society
Okay this helps provide context.Society is a rather vague term in this context; but I grew up in a Christian home; a very religious family so the vast majority of the people I had direct contact with had a very strong Christian POV, thus the people I had direct and consistent contact with while growing up were for the most part Christian; and even today most of the people who are religious that I have contact with are usually Christian.
In the context of which I was speaking; society was just the people I associate with; not everyone in the USA, everyone in the State I live in, or everyone in my particular neighborhood. Hope that clears that up.
On a side note, I had a kid ponder last year with me why Santa could be in multiple places at the same time. I said that Santa was in a state of quantum superposition (I thought it was funny).No! I defined Santa Clause as well! I don’t believe in him either, even though my definition may slightly differ from someone else who might actually believe.
Ken
What do you mean - "God"?
That is untrue. There is no proof that God exists. If you disagree I challenge you to provide such proof.
Even though there is no proof of Gods existence, if God were everything people claim he is; he could provide such proof in a way that even a skeptic like me could believe.
Your own personal experiences does not substantiate the bible, all it does is convince YOU.
...you wouldn't "need" proof; God's presence would be known through the experience of the numinous, as Rudolf Otto would have said it. In fact, this is the kind of phenomenon we see in Scripture when a person encounters the Divine (or one of His agents).
One of the most embarrassing events in Muhammad's life occurred when Satan put his words in Muhammad's mouth. Muhammad spoke Satan's words as the word of God. This event is documented by several early Muslim scholars and referenced in the Hadith and Quran. Later Muslims, ashamed that their self declared prophet spoke Satan's words, denied the event occurred. A myriad of excuses and denials have been put forth by these later Muhammadans to cover up Muhammad's sinful error.
It must be pointed out again that the "Satanic Verses" event is not something made up by non-Muslims. The event is recorded by the earliest Islamic sources available on Muhammad's life. No one should think that it is a story made up by people who are critical of Islam. It is an episode directly found in the early Islamic records.
This topic is one of the most controversial in Islam. Satan caused Muhammad to recite his words as God's words.
Ok, thanks. Now back to your question:The Creator of the cosmos and the Supreme Being, more powerful and intelligent than anyone else and also omniscient, omnipresent, and omnipotent.
No idea.So here's a question for all to ponder: Suppose that God manifests himself in some sort of physical or spiritual revelation, to you personally, you and a group of people, or to the entire planet. How would you know that this was God? How would you know, for instance, that it wasn't some sort of alien with super-advanced technology pretending to be God?
My Atheism is the stance that of all the God concepts Ive heard of, none of them sounds credible.What I would ask of you, then, is if your atheism is essentially the stance that the concepts of God you learned in Christianity are no longer believed by you ... yet you still may wonder and be curious as to whether certain types of supernatural phenomena are "real" without the "Christian biases" getting in the way ? IOW ... is your atheism the stance there are no gods, or that there are no gods that the Christianity of your "society" described as existing ?
Are you open to the idea there may be something else in existence that perhaps could have attributes that the 90% which you absorbed by osmosis somewhat simply misunderstood ?
On a side note, a kid whose family is struggling financially asked me why does Santa favor all the rich kids over the poor kids and give the rich kids X-Box, I Pads, and all the cool stuff; but he only gives the poor kids socks and ear muffs. (I thought it was kinda sad)On a side note, I had a kid ponder last year with me why Santa could be in multiple places at the same time. I said that Santa was in a state of quantum superposition (I thought it was funny).
Any being who is incapable of providing enough evidence to convince a skeptic like me to believe; is not worthy of being called God.The point of this thread is that God cannot provide proof in such a way that would convince a skeptic like you to believe. God cannot provide proof of himself through the five senses because an alternate explanation is always possible.
One's own personal experience can be in line with Scripture and thus one could know that Scripture is true (see Jn. 7:17). The Bible can be proven true by several ways, two of which are:
1) Experiential personal experience
2) Fulfilled Biblical prophecy
So here's a question for all to ponder: Suppose that God manifests himself in some sort of physical or spiritual revelation, to you personally, you and a group of people, or to the entire planet. How would you know that this was God? How would you know, for instance, that it wasn't some sort of alien with super-advanced technology pretending to be God?
A follow-up question for antitheists: If a personal manifestation/appearance of God wouldn't prove to you that God exists (since there could always be another explanation - aliens or whatever), then what sort of proof would you accept that God exists?
So here's a question for all to ponder: Suppose that God manifests himself in some sort of physical or spiritual revelation, to you personally, you and a group of people, or to the entire planet. How would you know that this was God? How would you know, for instance, that it wasn't some sort of alien with super-advanced technology pretending to be God?
A follow-up question for antitheists: If a personal manifestation/appearance of God wouldn't prove to you that God exists (since there could always be another explanation - aliens or whatever), then what sort of proof would you accept that God exists?
If it met your criteria of seeing evidence for it, why would you not call "God" whatever might exist ?My Atheism is the stance that of all the God concepts I’ve heard of, none of them sounds credible.
I am open to the idea that there could be something else in existence; but in order for me to believe it, there would have to be able to see evidence of it. And whatever might exist I do not call it God.
...you wouldn't "need" proof; God's presence would be known through the experience of the numinous, as Rudolf Otto would have said it. In fact, this is the kind of phenomenon we see in Scripture when a person encounters the Divine (or one of His agents).
Any being who is incapable of providing enough evidence to convince a skeptic like me to believe; is not worthy of being called God.
Experimental personal evidence only convinces you
As far as Bible prophecies.... Did you know the men who wrote the books of the bible also had access to the prophecies? If you gonna make up stories for the bible; might as well throw some fulfilled prophecies in there while you're at it!
...you mean the ones that deny Christ is the Son of God and that He was crucified and rose again? {tongue-in-cheek}And how do you know it's not Satan masquerading as God? Ever studied the Satanic verses in the Qur'an?
How would you differentiate this experience from a wholly imagined one?
Well, if we understand Otto correctly, the experience would be unmistakable if it were the 'real thing'; otherwise, we might assess ourselves as having had "A Beautiful Mind" moment.
As self-deception can be mistaken for the "real thing", it is the far more parsimonious conclusion.
...what was that Ronald Reagan comment by which he used to commonly retort?
Have you ever thought you might want to 'Occam' Occam's Razor?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?