Many states require that children be vaccinated.
The only time government should step in is when children are being physically, emotionally or sexual abused.
There are other reasons as well, why the government might need to step in. Neglect is a category of abuse as well.
It would be possible to argue that refusing to vaccinate children in this situation is a form of neglect. I am not sure that I would be willing to say it is severe enough to require government intervention, but I could go far enough to say that it is a form of neglect.
Wow, maybe you don't know that some vaccines have fetal tissue and some believe they alter DNA?After reading this article, I really don't understand why there would be religious objections to a vaccine, though. Someone please tell me where in Scripture God gives any indication that can be reasonably interpreted as Him despising, forbidding, or condemning one of His children getting a needle in his arm to help increase his chances of not contracting a viral infection. Where is one's Biblical morals being compromised to any degree in getting vaccinated?
Wow, maybe you don't know that some vaccines have fetal tissue and some believe they alter DNA?
Some were originally derived from abortive tissue.None have fetal tissue, some were tested on old fetal lines but do not contain fetal tissue.
Some were originally derived from abortive tissue.
The COVID-19 vaccine (J&J/Janssen) is made using fetal retinal cells.
That should be an issue for people who are pro life.
Severe neglect would be a type of physical and emotional abuse.
But no I disagree over vaccinations. Many people have well thought out reasons for why they refuse. They may be refusing due to chemicals present that they believe are harmful to health, allergies in their family, a belief that the vaccinations have not yet been tested enough or are effective, a child's past reaction to vaccination, religious views or a bundle of reasons. They are refusing out of love which is completely different to abuse.
Many people refused the MMR vaccine for their children due to their belief it caused autism. As much as I may personally disagree with their view it isn't my place or the governments place to force them to go against their conscience, which is what we are dealing with here.
No parent should feel forced to go against their own conscience when they have the child's best intentions at heart. Not while their children are happy and healthy. The only time I would say this stops is if their child is in some immediate danger like they got bitten by a snake and will die without anti venom.
If the argument for vaccination is about prevention or putting children at risk then we should also rightly police smoking in the home. The dangers of smoking have long been known with a lot of data to back it up yet no one mentions this.
Smoking and tobacco and children
Is putting your child at risk of all of that not some form of abuse?
I personally think its terrible but again I would not hand over those parents rights to the government because next time it will be on something else and then something else and one day people will realize all their rights have been stripped away.
If people are truly concerned then education would be of far more benefit.
None have fetal tissue, some were tested on old fetal lines but do not contain fetal tissue.
"On March 2nd, 2021, the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops issued a statement whichEven if that is true there are others that are not, so that opposition is mute.
Lol, that's absurd.
And many people have other religious objections.
"On March 2nd, 2021, the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops issued a statement which
addressed the use of Johnson & Johnson’s COVID-19 vaccine. The Bishops stated: “if one can
choose among equally safe and effective COVID-19 vaccines, the vaccine with the least
connection to abortion-derived cell lines should be chosen. Therefore, if one has the ability to
choose a vaccine, Pfizer or Moderna’s vaccines should be chosen over Johnson &
Johnson’s…"
"While Moderna and Pfizer used them in testing only, J&J also used them in the production of its vaccine."
Fetal-cell lines played a vital role in the development of all three vaccines."
COVID-19 vaccines and fetal tissue: the science and controversy explained
Of course made up ones. The new religion is willful ignorance and lies, evangelicals lead the charge because they believe their own lies
Yes at one time even my own church warned us agaisnt J and J, until J and J explained things. There is no talking to anti vaxxers. Humanity wants to destroy itself so bad than let it be done swiftly
Oh they explained that it's ok to use fetal tissue? Well then of course they could not be in the wrong!Yes at one time even my own church warned us agaisnt J and J, until J and J explained things. There is no talking to anti vaxxers. Humanity wants to destroy itself so bad than let it be done swiftly
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?