I highly suggest Call of Duty.

[TheSeventhSneeze]

callofduty.com (I can't post a direct link yet)

I believe it's the best WWII game on the market right now, much better than Medal of Honor IMHO.

 

[Kelly]

Is it really as short as I have been hearing?

I loved the demo. My only problem with this game (and MOH) is the scripting. While it makes for a great first time, cinematic experience, once you play it through one time you pretty much have seen it all.

 

[Mike_41786]

I like it too, I just play multiplayer on it. Great graphics, fast pace playing, high fps, great overall .

 

[Melange_Thief]

http://www.callofduty.com/

There you go.

 

[SirKenin]

It's made by 25 members of Electronic Arts who decided they didn't like the path EA was taking. They branched off and made their own version of what they thought MOA should have been.

 

[TheSeventhSneeze]

It's probably as long as MOH, but a lot better IMO. The scripting is there, but it's definately an experience! There are some things that change each time you play though. On the pegasus bridge level there is a series of tanks that come in and they always come from different directions, same thing for one of the Russian levels. I've also noticed the AI doing different things each time I played it. The Stalingrad level is right out of Enemy at the Gates and is the "Omaha Beach" of the game; it's truly amazing.

 

[Felron]

i love this game, this and battlefield 1942 are the best wwII games IMO.

but its very short, but replay is very high so i cant complain.

 

[Doubledb]

It's probably as long as MOH, but a lot better IMO. The scripting is there, but it's definately an experience! There are some things that change each time you play though. On the pegasus bridge level there is a series of tanks that come in and they always come from different directions, same thing for one of the Russian levels. I've also noticed the AI doing different things each time I played it. The Stalingrad level is right out of Enemy at the Gates and is the "Omaha Beach" of the game; it's truly amazing.

Not its not! .... ha ha, im just messing with you becuase i know you like the game so much. I mean i know you do. Had any wierd intense battle/war dreams lately? ha ha

 

[Kelly]

I really LOVE the "saving pvt ryan" effect when you are too close to an explosion. It's perfect.

 

[MiccyNarc]

If you are looking for Multiplayer, Red Orchestra (www.redorchestramod.com) is much, much better. Very realistic, better graphics, and best of all, it's free (well, you have to get UT2003, but that's only $20 now)

It's great German vs. Russian action, and version 1.2 is coming out soon, and it's going to work wonders for RO.

 

[II Paradox II]

I like it too, I just play multiplayer on it. Great graphics, fast pace playing, high fps, great overall .

I've heard it's good... how does the multiplayer compare to Battlefield 1942?

ken

 

[SirKenin]

If you are looking for Multiplayer, Red Orchestra (www.redorchestramod.com) is much, much better. Very realistic, better graphics, and best of all, it's free (well, you have to get UT2003, but that's only $20 now)

It's great German vs. Russian action, and version 1.2 is coming out soon, and it's going to work wonders for RO.

I'm grabbing that now Tanx for the link.

 

[MiccyNarc]

You are very welcome.
Version 1.2 of RO is supposed to come out today

 

[Felron]

it really cant be compared to battlefield 1942, they are to different.

so basicly its no where as good as bf1942 in multi. but they are very different.

 

[MiccyNarc]

RO 1.2 is out, if anyone cares
the patch is 278 megabytes