So those working at Facebook who determine what gets through, are they not people? How do they avoid these pit falls?
Their job is not to find THE TRUTH, but to adhere to the company standards.
If these emails were as alarming as it's being pushed, Giuliani wouldn't have sat on them for months."
On another site, someone posted a good summary of how flimsy this story is:
"Hunter Biden, who lives in Los Angeles, decides to fly 3000 miles across country, to drop off 3 MacBook Pros at a repair shop run by a blind guy who charges the insanely low price of $85.
He gets off the plane and drunk drives to the repair shop (because there aren't repair shops in LA). He drops them off, signs a contract for repair and then disappears. The repair shop owner recovers and reads Hunter's *private* emails, a few of which mention a possible meeting with his dad and is so alarmed, he contacts the FBI.
The FBI arranges to pick up the hard drives, but the computer repair shop owner takes a totally normal step of copying them. Once he realizes the FBI isn't doing anything with them, he calls up the most credible ex-Mayor on Earth and hands them the contents of these drives.
That totally credible ex-Mayor sits on them for months, then chooses to release them 3 weeks before the election. The mainstream media asks to independently verify their validity but said ex-Mayor does what all people trying to prove facts do and ignores these requests.
No one who does data recovery would read through thousands of personal emails, even if the computer is abandoned. You'd just wipe the drives clean and sell the computers used.
If these emails were as alarming as it's being pushed, Giuliani wouldn't have sat on them for months."
Additionally, the computer shop owner changed his story at least three times, and it comes out that he didn't volunteer the hard drive to the FBI; instead, they FBI got a grand jury subpoena and then picked up the device.
It appears that the NY Post also did not see the original emails as the dates from the copies they posted are from 2019; it appears that Giuliani is not willing to let anyone view the original files -- likely part of the reason Fox News passed on the story.
As for Biden's calendar, it is his VP calendar that is public records, so yes, unless contradicted by something substantial, I do believe it.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...40c702-0e4c-11eb-8074-0e943a91bf08_story.html
Social media outlets, WAPO, and intelligence experts were skeptical of the report.
Where's the contract and is it Hunter's signature?
Reality gets “bendy” sometimes; it comes-and-goes.Which is funny because that idea is about the most progressively academic starting point in the world.
How. Would any of us know what Hunter Biden’s drunk, (but incredibly steady), signature might look like?https://a57.foxnews.com/static.foxn...ds/2020/10/918/516/Biden-docs-1.jpg?ve=1&tl=1
You can see what you think.
How. Would any of us know what Hunter Biden’s drunk, (but incredibly steady), signature might look like?
I see scribbling, that can be done by anyone. Including myself.https://a57.foxnews.com/static.foxn...ds/2020/10/918/516/Biden-docs-1.jpg?ve=1&tl=1
You can see what you think.
Did you see some of the Russian propaganda stuff in 2016?
And even then it was in various directions to cause dissent more than to just aid one side.
Or if they don't exist, just make them up.There are certainly some strange elements. But I am not sure Giuliani wouldn't sit on them for the most advantageous political impact.
So those working at Facebook who determine what gets through, are they not people? How do they avoid these pit falls?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?