The article does not say it is true, but is simply reporting that one of Donald's lawyers claims it is true.
One of the ones that is not in jail?
The title of the link in the first post names Sidney Powell as the lawyer who claims they are sitting on evidence which has not yet been unveiled. I do not remember the article saying she is in jail . . . or not in jail.
The article was presented on November 14, 2020.
Now it is November 17, 2020.
Here is something I just found >
Sidney Powell on Election Fraud - Sunday Morning Futures - Fox News - November 15, 2020 - YouTube
Sidney is claiming she now has sworn witnesses that vote-processing software has design which makes it able to shift votes, and it has been used to defraud Donald of millions of votes, in a number of states. And Texas has known this software, "Dominion", can be used like this; so Texas refused to use it. Plus, she states the software has already been sold to other countries so it can be used like this.
She says, "I've got lots of ways to prove it" > but she is not going to let it out on national TV, "what all we have".
She says Dominion even has in its own manual, how to change votes.
Of course, if Joe's supporters can do this, Donald's supporters can . . . I suppose.
She says this has been done, in previous elections. How much could Republicans have also had access to Dominion???? . . . if what she is saying is basically possible with Dominion?
Sydney says she does not make statements that she can not prove. I understand it is basic that a competent lawyer says only what he or she can prove.
So, she has committed herself to this, in any case.
She says that states which bought the software qualify for criminal prosecution. Officers knew what they were getting. And she says even leading Democrats have made complaints about the system but were ignored. And letters of complaint have gone to intel and have not been dealt with; and so the chief of the C.I.A. needs to be fired, outright.
And she says they have identified the algorithm. And she says Joe knew, and that is why one time he said he knew they had the votes, but was forgetting not to let this out.
In any case, God's word says Satan has the whole world under his sway > 1 John 5:19.
So, I am not going to assume that only Joe or only Donald could be right. Both could be corrupt. For all I am a legal witness, either or both could be innocent, but ones in their systems could be rigging things, or trying to. But she appears to claim that Joe knew.
Of course, Sydney is not an independent investigator; so I think she is not allowed to let out anything she might discover corrupt about Donald . . . by the way, in case I understand this correctly. If she is his personal lawyer, more or less she is obligated to keep even certain wrong items confidential. But when a lawyer discovers certain things, one might have to stop representing a client, if staying with him or her would help promote what is illegal.
I read that one firm did withdraw from representing Donald . . . for the best interest of the firm and of Donald, it seems the firm's representation said to the press.
So, for all I know, it could be like in a football game. Often players are even filmed cheating, but the refs did not see it. And, no matter how badly even the refs call a game, the winner is considered to be the winner! lolololol
