Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I'm not trying to do do anythingNo, you are trying to do something that is never seen in biology. New species form, but once they are past the point where they cannot produce offspring there is no going back.
By the way, your wording is incorrect. Men are apes, you are an ape. To be specific you are a member of the family of great apes.
Hilarious.
I trust medicine because it has been deemed safe by the FDA, and generally is, or because I know it works. Funny that now I have to belive in evolution to trust medication. I mean...seriously? What a riot.
You create what ever weirdness you *think* works for you, but to me, it appears a desperate means of defense...very desperate.
Im not an apeNo, you are trying to do something that is never seen in biology. New species form, but once they are past the point where they cannot produce offspring there is no going back.
By the way, your wording is incorrect. Men are apes, you are an ape. To be specific you are a member of the family of great apes.
I'm not trying to do do anything
Nor do I want to
I would like.very much never to have seen what I have seen
Im not an ape
Actually you are:Im not an ape
GehazzisOh, I see you edited your post.
You may not be trying to do that conscientiously, but you are still trying to do the impossible.
And what have you seen that you wish that you had not seen?
I already gave you that evidence in the form of 2 commonly used textbooks used to present and teach this evidence. There is literally no better place for you to start than those textbooks if you actually want the examples you claim to want.
I can give you pictures of species of Spinatrypa (a brachiopod genus I am working on) as a way of demonstrating the evolutionary relationships within a single clade, but I don't think it'll be as easy for you to follow as simpler examples from the aforementioned textbooks. I attached a first draft of a figure for one of the Spinatrypa species (the individual pictures aren't labeled yet because I haven't gotten that far along yet). These are images of S. hystrix, a species of Spinatrypa that descended from S. trulla and flourished in the northern Appalachian Basin during the Late Devonian. We can look at and compare the morphological traits (internal and external) from S. hystrix and S. trulla and determine that these two species represent the same lineage with the latter being the ancestor of the former. The great thing about doing these studies with brachiopods (and other invertebrates) is that they have easy to identify morphological structures and they are abundant in the rock record. Making it easy to get large sample sizes to be able calculate basic statistics for reliably.
Is that what you want?
Nope
Yes, you (and literally every other human on Earth) are an ape. Specifically you are a Great Ape. You are in the same family as Chimpanzees and Gorillas.
You don't have to accept the fact of evolution, but it does make one a bit of a hypocrite to rely on evolution and to deny it at the same time.
OK, you have some pictures there, now how do they or whatever else you offer, prove evolution?
OK, you have some pictures there, now how do they or whatever else you offer, prove evolution?
an ant does naturally what it was naturally designed to doThis is akin to claiming that an ant is not a member of Hexapoda.
an ant does naturally what it was naturally designed to do
And because of this it bears fruit with seed in it according to its likeness /kind
Fruit being its offspring
Seed being its genetic material
and compare the morphology of these species in order to look at how, when, and why they evolved
Example please.
I was going to comment on the typo for "nothing". Your hands must have slipped on the keyboard and that was going to be my first question for you. When I hit the quote button I did not get the version that you first posted, I saw that corrected version and that was what I was commenting on. There was no implication that you were dishonest, you had merely already answered my first question for me.And by the way your comment, oh I saw you edited your post
Be honest sir, or don't address me again
What exactly did you see me "edit"
Typos?
I didn't change at all what I was saying
I didn't post something and decide on second thought to remove it
Yet that by your comment is what you would like to imply
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?