justlookinla
Regular Member
And more blah blah blah blah. Which is evasion, not evidence. There's a difference you know.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Now that is a different question, and I admit is a possibility (I am open-minded like that). But saying that there is no evidence supporting a natural process that resulted in humans (i.e. evolution) is pure and simple denial.
We have never observed anything but "naturalistic" (sic!) processes.A solely naturalistic process cannot completely, totally and solely explain the creation of humanity from a single life form of long long ago. We've never observed a naturalistic process doing such a thing.
What makes it impossible then? You can't just say it's impossible without going to details.
We have never observed anything but "naturalistic" (sic!) processes.
As soon as you will be able to bring observable non-natural processes to the table I will support the demand that they are mentioned in science classes. Promise!
We have never observed anything but "naturalistic" (sic!) processes.You haven't, nor has anyone else, observed naturalistic mechanisms producing anything remotely close to the complexity of a human from a simple life form.
Nothing has been observed which supports the guess that solely, only totally, completely naturalistic mechanisms could produce something as complex as a human from a single life form of long long ago. Nothing observed comes close to supporting such a creationist viewpoint.
Pick your favorite. Surprise me.
Everything that we observe is natural.
Fossil record: Simple life starts. It develops into more complex life. It diversifies. Vertebrates appear. They become more complex. Mammals appear. Dinosaurs go extinct. Mammals diversify. Humans appear. Evolution.
Your demand is unreasonable, no one observed the single life from to human, is simply because we didn't exist back then when single life forms first appeared.Nothing has been observed which supports the guess that solely, only totally, completely naturalistic mechanisms could produce something as complex as a human from a single life form of long long ago. Nothing observed comes close to supporting such a creationist viewpoint.
Your demand is unreasonable, no one observed the single life from to human, is simply because we didn't exist back then when single life forms first appeared.
It's has been explain by other people multiple times already, you just ignore them.Explain.
Sorry, nothing in your posts addresses the request for evidence that humanity is the creation of only naturalistic processes acting on a single life form from long long ago.
Try again.
It's has been explain by other people multiple times already, you just ignore them.
No, point in explain to a denialist.
Ok. (Hope you don't count your response as 'evidence')
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?