Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Yes, let's simply rule out the options available to cut down on unwanted pregnancies and abortion and focus only on the things education, support and adoptions. How about birth control, or is that also impractical? The right has been attacking sex education in schools and trying to outlaw birth control, so on top of outlawing abortion other avenues to reduce abortions through education or birth control are at risk.The last few pages have not been practical. Forced Castration? Tube tying? Vasectomy? Get serious.
Education and support are the best ideas. Maybe also education on values, virtues, life planning, and adoption processes.
It's quite silly to suggest that we on the right want to punish women for having sex leading to pregnancy. That's not the case at all. We just believe that the baby deserves to live and not have its life ended before it's even begun. Nobody is makes all the right choices in life as we all make mistakes. But killing doesn't rectify anything.Yeah, but then all the wrong sex doing women won’t get punished for all the wrong sex doings. You can’t go treating women like people you need to see them as non emotional ultra rational perfect decision makers in a world where bad things ONLY happen to bad people (the wrong sex doing women).
Giving birth is the punishment for the wrong sex doing (after the birth who cares what happens to the baby?) and childcare provision simply encourages the wrong sex doing. Abortions, childcare, education and birth control are the four dragons that have to be slain if punishing wrong sex doing women.
So?Would not work. For one thing, equal rights and equal protection would mean that the police would be required by law to investigate every miscarriage. There would have to be some modifications to the laws to accommodate the unborn.
It's quite silly to suggest that we on the right want to punish women for having sex leading to pregnancy. That's not the case at all. We just believe that the baby deserves to live and not have its life ended before it's even begun. Nobody is makes all the right choices in life as we all make mistakes. But killing doesn't rectify anything.
You bet I do.If you don't "want to punish women for having sex leading to pregnancy" then you support unfettered access (potentially free) to methods of contraception that prevent fertilization from occurring? ("The pill", condoms, etc.)
You bet I do.
Not necessarily, however the pregnant woman would first need to have a signed notice for flight approval by a licensed pediatrician and the family doctor within a week of the flight. Without such approvals, it may lead to child endangerment charges.If a pregnant woman would purchase a ticket for an airline flight could the airline charge her for two people?
>_<Not necessarily, however the pregnant woman would first need to have a signed notice for flight approval by a licensed pediatrician and the family doctor within a week of the flight. Without such approvals, it may lead to child endangerment charges.
Naturally, after all, the “child” would have to already have a Social Security number otherwise they wouldn’t be in “full compliance”.Not necessarily, however the pregnant woman would first need to have a signed notice for flight approval by a licensed pediatrician and the family doctor within a week of the flight. Without such approvals, it may lead to child endangerment charges.
It would, but then again making a fetus legally bestowed the benefits of full person hood would change a great many things for pregnant women.>_<
Wow, that would be an annoying law.
Yes, of course! I posted it before, but also needed is a 'Certificate of Conception' which time stamps the precise moment of fertilization.Naturally, after all, the “child” would have to already have a Social Security number otherwise they would be in “full compliance”.
Of course if there were any problems in the relationship (that had spawned this newest Citizen) the fetus would need to have legal representation for itself since the mother’s attorney couldn’t advocate for the legal entity that is the “child”.It would, but then again making a fetus legally bestowed the benefits of full person hood would change a great many things for pregnant women.
I was taught that it was OK when God killed millions of unborn children in the flood, and they all deserved it because humans begin to sin immediately after conception. Was that not correct?It's wrong to kill an unborn child. The fact that somehow a majority was taught abortion is ok blows my mind. How is it even remotely ok? Lord, have mercy
Equal rights? Are you sure about that??Give the unborn equal rights and equal protection under the law.
Identical twins start to exist as soon as God starts to create them. How He does it, I have absolutely no idea. He is the Creator of all life. Since every human is made in image of God, having an abortion is killing a image of God.So identical twins both exist in a single cell at conception? Yes or no.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?