Emmy said:
Dear Stinker, when I think of eternal punishment, I remember what our Lord Himself told us. For those men and women, who do not accept God`s Love and Forgiveness, there is a place for them, in outer darkness.
Inherent in this statement is an assertion that anyone who does not accept Christianity as true is making a positive choice to reject God's love, not merely either being ignorant of it or coming to a fairly-reasoned conclusion that it doesn't exist.
This is pretty clearly not true given that (1) throughout history many many people have never even HEARD of the Christian God and (2) among those who have learned of God as conceived of by Christians, and do not believe that such a being exists, at least some of them (and I would argue all of them) do not do so as a matter of choice but because the idea of such a God does not seem reasonable or plausible to them.
(The Catholics actually try to deal with the first part of this with their concept of 'Invincible Ignorance,' but most Protestants (e.g., Rev. Bailey
"God Almighty does not hear the prayer of a Jew" Smith) seem to think this is too big of a loophole.)
A place without God`s Love or Light, where there can be heard loud wailing and gnashing of teeth. To land there will truly be eternal JUSTICE, because people choose it themselves, and when they realise they made the wrong choice, there will be loud wailing and gnashing of teeth.
But doesn't the fact that they realize they made 'the wrong choice' imply that their choice, even if wrong, was an honest one? I mean, if they KNEW they were making 'the wrong choice' at the time they made it, it would be impossible for them to realize LATER that it HAD been a wrong choice, wouldn't it? And this being the case--that people made a choice that turned out to be 'wrong', but did so, well, in good faith, as it were, doesn't this tend to undercut the arguments about God's response to this choice being just? I mean, it is a well known principle in law that ignorance of the law is no excuse; but it is an equally well-established principle that intention, motive, and understanding of the consequences of one's actions play a sizeable role in judging a person's culpability for an act, isn't it?
Anyway, are you saying, then, that there isn't really an *active* torment of these benighted souls like some sort of Lake of Fire, demons tormenting them etc., but rather what causes them pain is their separation from God and their belated knowledge that they made a big mistake and will have to 'live' with the consequences of that mistake for all eternity?
If so, then this certainly seems like a less, well,
mean (for want of a better word) God-concept at first glance. But then, what of repentence, of redemption, supposedly key concepts to Christianity? These souls suffering in their eternal regret sound like prime candidates for redemption, don't they? I mean, what is repentance if not a profound regret for one's bad choices?
Yet supposedly, these souls, even those among them who were kind and good and loving to their fellows, will have to suffer eternally, because they did not realize their mistake while they still lived but only after dying, while people who may have done much worse things in life get a pass to Heaven because at the end, they *believed.*
Ultimately, then, it still comes down to what one *believes*, which seems a rather arbitrary basis upon which to decide such a momentous thing as one's eternal fate, given that their are many factors shaping what people believe which are beyond their control.
(As an aside, a common difference I see among religionists and the non-religious is how they view the matter of the role of volition in belief: in my observations, Christians seem much more likely to believe that people have some latitude in *choosing* what to believe, while non-religious people tend to be much more of the view that people generally believe, well, what seems most believable to them, and don't really have a lot of choice in the matter.)
Heaven, God`s Kingdom is a place where true, and selfless love for each other rules completely, where God will be worshipped, where Joy and Peace are the Norm. Anybody who expects another Earth, where everything goes, will never be accepted, will cause chaos, where Peace and Joy reign.
This seems like a false dichotomy. It is not clear that Heaven either HAS to be as you describe in the first part of this statement OR a place where everything goes and chaos rules.
But aside from that, what does worship of God have to do with 'true selfless love?' You seem to be saying that either people must both have 'true selfless love' for everyone AND worship God to be accepted into Heaven, which makes one wonder why God would consign to everlasting torment many otherwise good people just because they didn't worship Him; or perhaps you are saying that inherent in the character of any truly selfless and loving person is a desire to worship God, which would seem to suggest that non-Christians, atheists, etc., are not capable of being truly selfless and loving. Or maybe something else? In any event, this statement doesn't seem entirely sensible to me.
Only a loving God will have gone to such great lenghts, to spend eternity with His Own. I say this humbly and kindly, Stinker, and send greetings. Emmy, yoir sister in Christ.
If God is omnipotent, then the phrase 'great lengths' isn't really applicable to Him, is it? And if God is the Creator of the universe, then all are His, right?
So given that it all comes down to belief and worship, really, God isn't 'going to great lengths to spend eternity with His Own'; rather, He's putting in a system to infinitely reward those who like or worship (just an extreme form of like, really) Him and to infinitely punish those who don't.
This is how the common Christian concept of a Heaven of eternal bliss and a Hell of eternal torment seems to many non-Christians, myself included; but maybe, as the OP says, we're just spiritually blind.
Regards,