Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
To me the essential point of this verse is that some of natural Israel is not true Israel, that is the children of God.6It is not as though God's word had failed. For not all who are descended from Israel are Israel. 7Nor because they are his descendants are they all Abraham's children. On the contrary, "It is through Isaac that your offspring will be reckoned."[b] 8In other words, it is not the natural children who are God's children, but it is the children of the promise who are regarded as Abraham's offspring.
And here, the children of God are those God made promises to. Again, not natural Israel, but those God made promises to.9For this was how the promise was stated: "At the appointed time I will return, and Sarah will have a son."[c]
10Not only that, but Rebekah's children had one and the same father, our father Isaac. 11Yet, before the twins were born or had done anything good or badin order that God's purpose in election might stand: 12not by works but by him who callsshe was told, "The older will serve the younger."[d] 13Just as it is written: "Jacob I loved, but Esau I hated."[e]
Here Paul jumps the track. Pharaoh is a picture of God's election -- not a Jew. God can harden anyone He wants, including Gentiles. So God can have mercy on anyone He wants, including Gentiles.14What then shall we say? Is God unjust? Not at all! 15For he says to Moses,
"I will have mercy on whom I have mercy,
and I will have compassion on whom I have compassion."[f] 16It does not, therefore, depend on man's desire or effort, but on God's mercy. 17For the Scripture says to Pharaoh: "I raised you up for this very purpose, that I might display my power in you and that my name might be proclaimed in all the earth."[g] 18Therefore God has mercy on whom he wants to have mercy, and he hardens whom he wants to harden.
See that v. 16 in there? If faith or belief is from the human will, Paul is saying, "Well, no, God's choosing doesn't depend on that." Remember Isaac? No will or exertion there. How about Jacob? No will or exertion. Now it may be that you think of faith as no action of the human will. That's actually a view that comes in from Calvin himself even. And it will be interesting to put all the pieces of Scripture in place and see what you come up with. I may have a bit of time to do that, I'll try to hit some other points of discrepancy as well.For he says to Moses, "I will have mercy on whom I have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I have compassion." 16So then it depends not on human will or exertion, but on God, who has mercy. 17For the Scripture says to Pharaoh, "For this very purpose I have raised you up, that I might show my power in you, and that my name might be proclaimed in all the earth." 18So then he has mercy on whomever he wills, and he hardens whomever he wills.
I would think it's a much wider question, as Paul's description is extremely wide, covering myriad examples of choosing -- can God still attribute blame on people if God is doing the hardening? This is similar to the very wide hypothetical question Paul asks in the start of Romans 3.19One of you will say to me: "Then why does God still blame us? For who resists his will?" 20But who are you, O man, to talk back to God? "Shall what is formed say to him who formed it, 'Why did you make me like this?' "[h] 21Does not the potter have the right to make out of the same lump of clay some pottery for noble purposes and some for common use?
"Then why does God still blame us" he is speaking about the Jews' heart being hardened, them making the excuse that they can no longer be to blame.
I'd invite you to take a look at Romans 11:28-29.but God is not speaking about hardening the true "elect", those that he loves, but his enemies. The pharaoh was God's enemy, but why did he not destroy his kingdom right away? Instead, he raised him up to become a powerful leader, and it was for a purpose.
On which we'd agree. However, we disagree on what that very good basis is.17For the Scripture says to Pharaoh: "I raised you up for this very purpose, that I might display my power in you and that my name might be proclaimed in all the earth."[g]
This doesn't say that he choses people at random and for no good reason, and hardens people for no good reason either and we shouldn't question his odd ways...the contrary. He has very good reason!
You're saying this is the reason why God hardened Israel. But put in context, that's not what Paul said. Paul said it's the reason why he's praying that they might be saved. Israel has zeal, but it's wrongly placed, and so they didn't submit to God's righteousness. They need to be saved.why then did he harden israel?
3Since they did not know the righteousness that comes from God and sought to establish their own, they did not submit to God's righteousness.
To me the essential point of this verse is that some of natural Israel is not true Israel, that is the children of God.
And here, the children of God are those God made promises to. Again, not natural Israel, but those God made promises to.
Here Paul jumps the track. Pharaoh is a picture of God's election -- not a Jew. God can harden anyone He wants, including Gentiles. So God can have mercy on anyone He wants, including Gentiles.
God's choosing is based on who He wants to have mercy on.
See that v. 16 in there? If faith or belief is from the human will, Paul is saying, "Well, no, God's choosing doesn't depend on that." Remember Isaac? No will or exertion there. How about Jacob? No will or exertion. Now it may be that you think of faith as no action of the human will. That's actually a view that comes in from Calvin himself even. And it will be interesting to put all the pieces of Scripture in place and see what you come up with. I may have a bit of time to do that, I'll try to hit some other points of discrepancy as well.
I gotta go, I'll look at this later thoughI would think it's a much wider question, as Paul's description is extremely wide, covering myriad examples of choosing -- can God still attribute blame on people if God is doing the hardening? This is similar to the very wide hypothetical question Paul asks in the start of Romans 3.
I'd invite you to take a look at Romans 11:28-29.As regards the gospel, they are enemies of God for your sake. But as regards election, they are beloved for the sake of their forefathers. For the gifts and the calling of God are irrevocable.It's not easy to navigate this verse from any view, but it's definitely saying some of the hardening in Israel occurred for the sake of bringing in Gentiles, but regarding election they're beloved.
And in fact, y'hafta put the entirety of Romans 11:11ff in that context, because Paul explicitly states that this hardening is not to the point of falling:So I ask, did they stumble in order that they might fall? By no means! Rather through their trespass salvation has come to the Gentiles, so as to make Israel jealous.So here the issue isn't gaining or losing your salvation -- it's gaining or losing what they were seeking -- righteousness -- and that required God's mercy to receive. To flout those things that are also required -- faith, for instance -- would defy God's mercy a different way and cut you off at a tighter core. But of course it definitely does require continuance in faith -- perseverance in faith -- for those who have yet received God's mercy. Losing that faith definitely does cut you off from God's mercy.
I've few qualms about saying that people who are in church and who have fervor and strong emotions and deep convictions even, may yet drop out of their faith. We stand on the same grounds of faith, grace, and God's choosing that the Jewish people do. It works the same. Our hardness of heart can occur at different levels, and that hardness can thwart our attaining God's righteousness. God's mercy is thus required to soften our hearts, and not harden our hearts.
On which we'd agree. However, we disagree on what that very good basis is.
You're saying this is the reason why God hardened Israel. But put in context, that's not what Paul said. Paul said it's the reason why he's praying that they might be saved. Israel has zeal, but it's wrongly placed, and so they didn't submit to God's righteousness. They need to be saved.Brothers, my heart’s desire and prayer to God for them is that they may be saved. 2For I bear them witness that they have a zeal for God, but not according to knowledge. 3For, being ignorant of the righteousness of God, and seeking to establish their own, they did not submit to God’s righteousness.
Then granting that, the idea of calling Israel a "real elect" isn't really that valid a point. They're not specifically the elect, it is just that in natural terms the promises are made to them. Because if you look at this logically, there's no correspondence between "Jew" and elect.yes, this is what I said.
Well, one slight problem there. "the promise" is interjected by the translators. Can you cite something more ... explicit? Because it's very easy to point out, Paul could mean the children of Abraham, or righteousness, is by faith. And then the question would revolve back to you.16Therefore, the promise comes by faith, so that it may be by grace and may be guaranteed to all Abraham's offspring—not only to those who are of the law but also to those who are of the faith of Abraham. He is the father of us all.
I look at it again.The most sound interpretation would not include one that "jumps the track." Look at it again.
ROFL! Yes, I agree, but if you check Paul is also talking about hardening in the same breath. If you're saying Paul is focused on electing and hardening Jewish people in this line, then God's hardening a Gentile doesn't make any sense.Pharaoh was NOT one God's elect, this is, Pharaoh was an object of God's wrath.
Agreed. But you're saying He chooses people because they have faith. We're saying people have faith because He chooses them.Yes, but he makes it clear that HE Choses to have mercy on those that believe/ have faith.
Yes. OK, I don't think you're saying the man with faith has no desire to believe, is that right or wrong? Does the man with faith have a desire to believe? On what basis does God have mercy on him? Or is God unyielding to a person's desire to believe in Him?verse 16 actually means that Man can not save himself by works or desires, the only thing that saves him is God's mercy.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?