• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

How, then, is the Calvinist refuted? (2)

Status
Not open for further replies.

CCWoody

Voted best Semper Reformada signature ~ 2007
Mar 23, 2003
6,684
249
56
Texas
Visit site
✟8,255.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I will say --- one cannot be "dead in sins", and "believing", at the same time.

Ben, have you figured out yet that your theology MUST have men still dead in sins and excercising a living faith. Something which you deny is possible in one post yet claim happens in another post.

There is no escaping the fact that "saving-faith", occurred WHEN we were dead in sins.

Your theology MUST have someone exercising a living faith and still be dead in sins. It doesn't matter how long it happens, your theology must still have a living faith producing deadness. This is contrary to Scripture....


[bible]1 John 5:1[/bible]

Your argument is not with me. It is with the Bible.

Recognize that all true Christians will be Calvinists in glory....

Your friendly neighborhood Cordial Calvinist
Woody.
 
Upvote 0

frumanchu

God's justice does not demand second chances
Site Supporter
Apr 5, 2003
6,719
469
48
Ohio
✟85,280.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
BTW, I notice that the Calvinists are avoiding posts 106-108 completely...

BTW, I notice that Ben is avoiding [post=39517479]post 76[/post] completely...

Just another in the ever-growing list of posts and points that Ben is afraid to address.
 
Upvote 0

cygnusx1

Jacob the twister.....
Apr 12, 2004
56,208
3,104
UK Northampton
Visit site
✟94,926.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Upvote 0

Ben johnson

Legend
Site Supporter
Feb 9, 2002
16,916
404
Oklahoma
Visit site
✟99,049.00
Faith
Christian
Behe'sBoy said:
It does no good. I've responded to similar posts by you, Ben. As I've said time and time again - man is not capable of the type of faith you are talking about until God makes him capable. That's the bottom line with this issue.

Your view gives man the glory in his conversion - mine gives God the glory - where it belongs...
I don't mean to be disrespectful --- when "arguing theology", it's essential to cite verses in support of one's position.

Have you any to support what you just said?

:)
 
Upvote 0

Ben johnson

Legend
Site Supporter
Feb 9, 2002
16,916
404
Oklahoma
Visit site
✟99,049.00
Faith
Christian
Woody said:
Ben, have you figured out yet that your theology MUST have men still dead in sins and excercising a living faith. Something which you deny is possible in one post yet claim happens in another post.
I never denied "it's possible" --- Scripture states exactly that. There is no way to erase or tear-out the words, "by grace through faith", from Eph2:5-8. Because Eph2:5-8 is not talking about being saved TWICE, then "made-alive", which happened WHEN we were dead-in-sins, was accomplished THROUGH faith.

If faith "made us alive WHEN we were dead", then faith preceded "made-alive".
Your theology MUST have someone exercising a living faith and still be dead in sins. It doesn't matter how long it happens, your theology must still have a living faith producing deadness. This is contrary to Scripture....
Huh? Living faith produces LIFE. Dead-in-sins-man believes, and through faith becomes alive.

That doesn't even make sense saying "living faith produces deadness".
1 John 5:1
Whosoever believeth that Jesus is the Christ is born of God: and every one that loveth him that begat loveth him also that is begotten of him.


Your argument is not with me. It is with the Bible.
Huh??? :scratch: What does that prove?

"Whoever believes Jesus is the Messiah, is born of God"; and was born (Jn1:13) WHEN he believed-received Christ! (Jn1:12!)"

No conflict whatsoever with "Responsible Grace".

....however, let's read further while we're in 1Jn5:

"He who HAS the Son, has the life; he who has not the Son of God, has not the life. I write this to you who BELIEVE in the name of the Son of God that you may KNOW you have eternal life." 1Jn1:12-13

"WATCH yourselves (against deceivers), that you not lose what was wrought; he who goes too far and does not ABIDE in the teachings of Christ, has not God." 2Jn1:7-9


Let's see; he's talking to the SAVED (2:1:1!), speaking of "guard against decievers" --- and warning that "whoever forsakes Jesus' teachings doesn't have God".

That's as "OSNAS" as Scripture can get, Woody.

Sounds rather like Col2:6-8, doesn't it???
 
Upvote 0

Ben johnson

Legend
Site Supporter
Feb 9, 2002
16,916
404
Oklahoma
Visit site
✟99,049.00
Faith
Christian
Frumanchu said:
BTW, I notice that Ben is avoiding post 76 completely...

Just another in the ever-growing list of posts and points that Ben is afraid to address.
You know very well that I no longer respond to your posts (except rarely like when I'm called "afraid").

Every time I've responded in the past, the end was the same. So I'll respect you as my Christian brother, and wish you God's blessings and only good things. Hope you regard me the same.

:)
 
Upvote 0

nobdysfool

The original! Accept no substitutes!
Feb 23, 2003
15,018
1,006
Home, except when I'm not....
✟21,146.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Constitution
You know very well that I no longer respond to your posts (except rarely like when I'm called "afraid").

Every time I've responded in the past, the end was the same. So I'll respect you as my Christian brother, and wish you God's blessings and only good things. Hope you regard me the same.

:)
So Ben IS afraid to answer Fru's post....interesting....
 
Upvote 0
R

Rightglory

Guest
Ben Johnson,
Hi, "Rightglory". The thread is about "Calvinism" --- I feel that Calvinism, or "Reformed Theology", is fully overturned. Posts 106, 107, and 108, were particularly devastating; 106 establishes that a "dead-in-sins" man, can believe --- and that belief precedes "made-alive". 108 establishes that "God's grace is recieved by man's faith" --- faith does not make a man righteous or meritorious, faith receives God's grace and righteousness. Each assertion was fully backed by Scripture.
I fully agree with you on almost everything. I also agree that you have clearly shown Reformed theology overturned.
However, in the above statement a key phrase is incorrect.
It is "establishes that a dead-in-sins man can believe and that belief precedes "made alive".
There is no man that is "dead in sins" any longer. That means we would still be under the condemnation of Adam. Christ overturned that condemnation by His resurrection. He freed mankind from the bondage to death and sin. If Christ is not risen, then we are not saved, if the dead are not raised, then Christ has not risen. I Cor 15:14-19 clearly shows that Christ gave life to mankind. If He did not, then even our faith is moot, in vain. Faith does not grant life eternal or immortality.
Faith places a believer into Christ so we can be joined with Christ. We live IN Him because He lives and restored life to mankind.

But also, your statement, "faith does make man righteous". We are justified by faith. Justified and be made righteous are the same thing. It is because we are justified that we are given all the special Grace given to the elect. Faith initiates it, as well as recieves it.
The context equates "made-alive", with "saved"; it does not convey "all mankind is made alive".
Vs 5 does not which is why the parentheses around the phrase. All mankind of necessity was made alive otherwise faith or the through faith which follows in vs 8 he adds this phrase because he is refering back to the verses of 7-8 which is referencing believers.
Rom 11:32, Rom 5:18-19 all clearly indicate that Christ redeemed mankind from death. From the condemnation through Adam. He corrected the fall. That is the ONLY purpose of Christ's work. It was to restore mankind to his rightful place in the created order, that of being a human being, created in His Image to freely choose to live IN Him, to be made into His likeness. Death prevented, precluded any union or communion with God since man would simply die and cease to exist. That is the meaning of death, dust to dust of Gen 3:19. A pile of dust cannot believe and have any meaning and consequence for eternity.
...yet, to actually BE saved, requires conscious belief. Grace is RECEIVED. Verses like Rom5:17 are very clear on this. And to establish that "clarity", we must agree on the two points:
yes, soul salvation. this is what man fell from to which Christ restored mankind. We are not being saved from the very purpose of our created existance. We are being saved firstly from the condemnation through Adam. He eliminated that death by conquering it, not just for believers, but for the world. There can be no heaven or hell unless man has life. If you assume that non-believers are still under the condemnation of Adam and have not actually been redeemed, they will remain a pile of dust. They cease to exist as human beings. Yet we know that all shall be raised, Christ lost none to death, John 6:39 and then vs 40 makes the distinction that those that see and believe of all mankind will also have eternal life, be raised, but it will be with Him. A pile of dust cannot stand in judgement. A pile of dust will not even be able to experience the absence of God, the spiritual death as a result of his own rejection. He has already been condemned, why do you think he should be condemned again?
1. "Reign with Christ", conveys SALVATION.
2. Grace is received, which denotes belief.
On this I fully agree with you. But this is referencing the salvation of our individual souls. It is not referencing the salvation from the fall, from death, the Work of Christ on the Cross. This faith is totally inoperative unless man has life. If God desires all men to be saved, that is the salvation of their souls, at least it is encumbent that He first saves mankind from death so he is enabled to not just believe, but have eternal consequences.
There is no way to deny either point.
I don't and don't need to. They are addressing a different aspect of salvation. It is the only place that you fall into the same blunder as Calvinist do. You conflate the Work of Christ on the Cross with the acceptance or man's response to Christ's call to repentance.
You make the response part of the Work of Christ on the Cross. Christ saved not a single individual soul on the Cross. He provided the means, the ability, the capability for man to get back to the purpose for which we were created to be and do with God prior to the fall. It is what man was restored to which he lost due to the fall. Man cannot save himself. How can a dead mortal give life to himself. How can a mortal who is sinful, propitiate his own sins not to say of the whole world. That is why Christ was needed, why He assumed that fallen human nature and by His resurrection raised it to life. It is the meaning and definition of the Incarnation.
And yet, all is predicated upon faith.
The salvation of mankind has nothing to do with faith. That is what Paul is describing in Rom 9-11, who God would save. Man has no say in the matter. God created man, without his imput and God will restore not just man, but the universe back to life as well without the imput of man. Who can resist God's will. It is not of flesh, nor the will of man, but of God. Rom 11:32, God had mercy upon all. This aligns with Rom 5:18-19 as with many other texts. Faith has nothing to do with Christ's work on the Cross, BUT it has everything to do with man's response to such a great mercy. Man is justified by faith. He enters into Christ through baptism, puts on Christ, recieves the Holy Spirit and all the rest. But that is what man was restore to do. What man was created to do in the first place and from which he fell due to the fall, death.
Faith receives immortality.
Then all those raised in the last day to stand in judgement, there will be many who will be condemned. Are you willling to say they gained immortality by their faith? Mankind gains immortality through Christ resurrection. Again see I Cor 15 which is the chapter which describes the centrality of the resurrection for all of salvation. Without the resurrection everything is moot. We would still be under Adam and condemned to death, non-existance, dust to dust. Is there life in dust? God told Adam he would return from which he came, dust. But He also gave the promise of a redeemer of that judgement in Gen 3:15.
And salvation is void, vain, moot, without faith.
Salvation of ones soul. The spiritual aspect of man, not the physical. The unrighteous will have immortality as well, they will live eternally, condemned to the spiritual death, the second death, not the first death.
Recognizing that "reign-with-Christ" denotes salvation, then Paul plainly states in 2Tim2:11-13, that if we endure, then we shall reign with Him; but if we ARE faithless, Jesus will deny us before God (and the only possible understanding is that we then will NOT reign with Him!)
The salvation of ones soul, the spiritual salvation, the salvation of each individual choosing or rejecting Christ. It now has eternal consequences because mankind has life, eternal life, immortality which was lost in the fall.
I don't think anyone is actually FREED from sin, BEFORE believing/receiving Christ. See Jn8:34-36. But we're more in agreement than not.
Freed as from the condemnation of death, mortality of Adam, thus sin because we sin because we are dead, mortal. We sin through the flesh. We choose to either remain under sin or under Christ. All men still sin, on either side. It is that man is now judged on his own sins and is not under the condemnation of Adam. Theologically if under Adam, whether one could believe and have faith or sin any way one chose would have made no difference whatsoever. Man was already condemned to death through Adam. It didn't matter what he could or could not do. Christ lifted that condemnation, so now man is responsible for his actions, for his choices, for what he does in his relationship with His creator. We all have the same choice that Adam had, live with God or reject Him, freely. That is what it means to be freed from death and sin respective of Christ's Work on the Cross.
"Justly judged", by definition because of his OWN CHOICE. That's why Calvinism errs at the most foundational level.
yes, as I have just explained above. And you are correct regarding Calvinism, but you are incorrect in that faith saved mankind or has anything to do with it.
Life is needed in order to even have one single soul believe. If even one is not raised, or given life,then Christ failed in overcoming that death and he lost at least one human being who bore His Image. See John 6:39. It says He did not fail.
"Salvation" always conveys "spiritual life".
That depends on the context. But spiritual life in impossible without physical life or immortality, the salvation of mankind from the fall.
Verse 39 connects with Jn17:6 --- Jesus is affirming His authority, nothing more, nothing less (see verse 42). So "all God gives Jesus", are "those who BELONG to God". Given THROUGH belief, not before.
yes, precisely which is why it also aligns with Col 1:15-20, with II Cor 5:18-19 also Rom 5:10 where a distinction is made in the same verse.Rom 3:22-24 also, as well as many more.
Jn6:40 clearly and plainly rests "saved", on the foundation of "belief".
And therefore you have your distinction from all, the world, the universe, to those that see, believe, have faith, accept and remain faithful.
With respect, this is a faulty understanding; "dead men", can believe. Jesus spent much time rebuking (Matt23:13, Jn5:39-47, Matt11:21-24) people for REFUSING to believe.
The point I made above cleaifies this. No man is dead any longer. That is precisely why Christ can rebuke them for no believing. No man has an excuse any longer, actually he never had anyway. Paul makes that clear in Rom 2 as well.
Unbelievers are not "spiritually alive"; and God chooses no one to spiritual life and faith.
no, but they are alive physically otherwise faith is impossible, moot, vain. If man is going to die permanently as in remaining under Adam's condemnation, then it matters not what faith might do or that man even has faith, it is moot. Man needs life first before he can live IN Christ.
Christ saved mankind so that man could live In Him. We are saved by His life, spiritually.
As I said, we're more in agreement than not; what He accomplished on the Cross, was redemption and propitiation for EVERY MAN (for all time). Heb10:12.
You said that last time as well, yet you are miles apart regarding Christ's actual accomplished work on the Cross.
Immortality is the reward to believers, wrath is the reward to the unrighteous
eternal wrath. Wrath or even being unrighteous has no consequences unless man has life, immortality. Hell is immortal, eternal. A pile of dust cannot stand in judgment, nor suffer the pangs of hell.
"immortality", in the meaning of "spiritually-alive", is not bestowed on unbelievers.
immortality has NEVER meant anything spiritual. It is a physical existance. If not then our mortal nature is but a spiritual existance as well, and our so-called biological death is a spiritual death.
Calvinism has two great errors --- first, in misunderstanding man's roll in RECEIVING God's grace; second in misunderstanding our roll in persevering in Jesus.
I understand that fully and agree with you.
But, nevertheless, you fail to understand what Christ actually accomplished on the Cross for mankind. For His created order actually. Faith does not give life to the universe either.
Paul did not include "through faith" in Eph2, absentmindedly (or offhandedly); faith is the means by which God's grace, saves us.
No, he meant what he states, but faith has nothing to do with verse 5. Faith also does not save mankind from the fall. Only Christ can and did actually, fully, completely, without fail, redeem mankind from the fall. He reversese the decision of death against Adam.
There is a time when Calvinists and I can stand together in faith, certain of each others' salvation; and there is a time when I am greatly concerned about their steadfastness in faith.
We have nothing to do with our immortality, but everything to do with cooperating with God respective of faith. It is why we were created in the first place. It is what Adam was doing before the fall. It is what we were restored to be able to do. But whether one is soul saved, I leave to each individual and with the Holy Spirit. I am not the judge. I can only proclaim the Gospel as He has given it and has preserved it for all mankind.
 
Upvote 0
R

Rightglory

Guest
Ben,
My statement: This also aligns with all the reconciling texts like Col 1:15-20, and II Cor 5:18-19.
Your response...
We must understand that "reconcilliation", is conditional. In Col1:21-23, we are reconciled to God through Jesus' body, IF INDEED we CONTINUE in the faith firmly established and steadfast and not be moved away from the Hope of the Gospel.
that relative to faith, but the above statement of mine and the texts are not even addressing believers. It is addressing Christ's work on the Cross. Christ redeemed, reconciled, justified, made righteous, made accepable, ALL things to God. It is what makes justification by faith possible. The reconciliation to God by faith, and through faith, is initiated by man's acceptance to the call of God to all men to repent. God may do the work, but does not do it automatically or arbitrarily, but only by faith and through faith.
So reconcilliation conditions on our "being in Christ". Which is "by faith". Reconcilliation is TO the world, but only OF believers.
No, it is actually quite the other way around, First, mankind is reconciled to God, man has nothing to do with it in the least. II Cor 5:18-21 gives you both reconciliations. God reconciled mankind, but now as believers we have that responsibility to be co-workers with God and pleading vs 20 that you, whomever you are proclaiming the Gospel, be reconciled to God. Vs 1 of 6 continues the same thought.
But man is only reconciled to God IF he believes, has faith, and remains IN Christ only IF he remains reconciled. We remain reconciled by repentance, confession of the sins which is the ONLY thing that can separate man from God. It is why believers can become unbelievers, because they permit sin to rule, they lose faith, they become unfaithful and are no longer reconciled to God.
You are still insisting as the Calvinists do that most of creation is still under Adam and all subject to permanent death. Believing will be moot if that was actually the case, and not just your understanding of the theology. Thus you fail in being perfectly in harmony with the Gospel of Christ.
 
Upvote 0

Ben johnson

Legend
Site Supporter
Feb 9, 2002
16,916
404
Oklahoma
Visit site
✟99,049.00
Faith
Christian
NBF said:
So Ben IS afraid to answer Fru's post....interesting....
speechless-smiley-034.gif


==========================================

Hi, "Rightglory"! Goodness! I didn't intend to evoke such a response! I'll hafto reply later; but you already know that we'll be more in agreement than not.

:)
 
Upvote 0

frumanchu

God's justice does not demand second chances
Site Supporter
Apr 5, 2003
6,719
469
48
Ohio
✟85,280.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
You know very well that I no longer respond to your posts (except rarely like when I'm called "afraid").

Every time I've responded in the past, the end was the same. So I'll respect you as my Christian brother, and wish you God's blessings and only good things. Hope you regard me the same.

:)

Whether you answer or not, I will continue to address your posts. I have pointed out a HUGE problem with your theology previously in this thread.

Whether you want to continue discussion with me or not, it's a question that demands an answer. According to your statements I see no possible way that ANYONE could have been saved before Pentecost. I wouldn't think that you would truly believe such a thing, but that is the logical conclusion from your statements in light of Scripture. If I'm misunderstanding what you wrote, please show me how.

Ben, we made good progress up to a point with our last extended discussion about the parable of the sower. We had actually arrived at a point of mutual agreement and then you inexplicably reversed your statements.

I very much would like to attempt such rational conversation again, but it takes two willing parties to seek and find common ground. I am always willing to do so, but I cannot pursue it if you are not willing.
 
Upvote 0

heymikey80

Quidquid Latine dictum sit, altum viditur
Dec 18, 2005
14,496
921
✟41,809.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
You know very well that I no longer respond to your posts (except rarely like when I'm called "afraid").

Every time I've responded in the past, the end was the same. So I'll respect you as my Christian brother, and wish you God's blessings and only good things. Hope you regard me the same.
And lack of response to Calvinists doesn't conclude that Calvinists haven't responded to your assertions.
 
Upvote 0

AndOne

Deliver me oh Lord, from evil men
Apr 20, 2002
7,477
462
Florida
✟28,628.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
I don't mean to be disrespectful --- when "arguing theology", it's essential to cite verses in support of one's position.

Have you any to support what you just said?

:)

Matthew 11:27 for starters....
 
Upvote 0

heymikey80

Quidquid Latine dictum sit, altum viditur
Dec 18, 2005
14,496
921
✟41,809.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
"Granted"? What does that mean? "Charizomai" means "give graciously/freely, bestow". In Eph1:5-6, the kind intention of God's will was freely bestowed upon us in the Beloved --- Jesus.

God's kind will is clearly stated in John6:40: "This is the will of God, that all who see Jesus AND BELIEVE may be saved".

It's fully consistent to perceive Philip1:29 to intend "granted to believe, and suffer", as something freely chosen.

"Granting" is the provision, "receiving by faith" is the realization.
What's granted is faith! Don't you realize, you can't receive the instrument by which you receive what's granted, until you have the instrument?

"And now, once we're inside the gates, we'll spring from inside the Trojan Rabbit and catch them by surprise!"

The fact that Paul says these things including faith are "not of yourselves" (Ep 2:8), it just sends this argument out to sea.

It's become incoherent.
 
Upvote 0

heymikey80

Quidquid Latine dictum sit, altum viditur
Dec 18, 2005
14,496
921
✟41,809.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
As we've discussed >2 dozen times, this is what He really said:

The Jews asked Him, "How long will you keep us in suspense? If you are the Messiah, tell us plainly."

Jesus said, "I told you (that I'm the Messiah), but you do not believe (that I'm the Messiah); you do not believe (that I'm the Messiah), because you are not of My sheep (because you have not believed in Me). If ANYONE (tis) enters through Me, he shall be saved (shall become My sheep), and shall go in and out and find pasture (shall become My sheep)". Jn10:24, 25, 26, 9
Actually, you haven't mentioned that at all to me.

Your point isn't carried by the context. It's quite clear (and in your interpretation unmentioned) that those who are Christs sheep believe Him. If "believe" never means "believe Him" that connection with "because you are not of My sheep" is severed. In your interpretation you actually have no context from which to assert that Christ's sheep believe in Him.

So ... refuted.
It still says, "WHEN we were dead ...God made us alive ...by grace THROUGH FAITH".

No way to change that...
Yeah. Just point out it's in error:
"By grace you have been saved through faith" Paul, Ephesians, in his own words.

Those verbs are really getting in the way of this argument. Saved -- by Grace. Saved -- through Faith.

Works great. Less fiddling.
Apparently we do. "...those WHO RECEIVE the abundance of grace and WHO RECEIVE the gift of righteousness shall reign through ...Jesus Christ." Rom5:17
It's apparent we don't, when your prooftext doesn't even mention one of the nouns I asserted.

You don't receive grace through faith.

Stands.

 
Upvote 0

CCWoody

Voted best Semper Reformada signature ~ 2007
Mar 23, 2003
6,684
249
56
Texas
Visit site
✟8,255.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I never denied "it's possible" --- Scripture states exactly that.
Bzzzzz!!! Wrong answer.

Ok, class, let's see what Ben said earlier....

I will say --- one cannot be "dead in sins", and "believing", at the same time. ~ Ben Johnson

If faith "made us alive WHEN we were dead", then faith preceded "made-alive".
You are, AGAIN, contradicting yourself. One cannot believe, i.e. have faith, and be dead simultaneously. This is your earlier statement!!!!

Therefore, one cannot have a living faith and be dead simultaneously.

You are now free to flip flop your position, AGAIN.

Huh? Living faith produces LIFE. Dead-in-sins-man believes, and through faith becomes alive.

I will say --- one cannot be "dead in sins", and "believing", at the same time. ~ Ben Johnson

Hello!!!

Can you keep your story straight. By your own testimony, one cannot have a living faith AND be dead. You can't have it both ways, Ben.

BTW, if it is faith that makes one alive and faith is NOT of grace as you have said earlier and faith is not from God but from yourself, then you have entirely removed grace from your salvation.

And, since we KNOW that faith is accounted for righteousness, you have a nifty graceless deserving salvation.

It is almost like you just needed God to die and get out of your way.

Remember, Ben, this MUST be true: It is of faith that it might be of grace. ~ Sola Fide, Sola Gratia

That doesn't even make sense saying "living faith produces deadness".
Huh??? :scratch: What does that prove?

Exactly, Ben. Therefore, one cannot have a living faith and be dead because for however long this state lasts, you have a living faith producing deadness.

"Whoever believes Jesus is the Messiah, is born of God"; and was born (Jn1:13) WHEN he believed-received Christ! (Jn1:12!)"

Yet another glaring contradiction, Ben, in your false view of John 1:12. Let's take the first moment of belief....

Is 1 John 5:1 true? Yes. Therefore, in the first moment of belief one is ALREADY born of God for whoever believes Jesus is the Christ IS born of God. It doesn't say will be born of God, the verb tense YOU need. The verb tense is ALREADY born of God.

Recognize that all true Christians will be Calvinists in glory....

Your friendly neighborhood Cordial Calvinist
Woody.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mesue
Upvote 0

CCWoody

Voted best Semper Reformada signature ~ 2007
Mar 23, 2003
6,684
249
56
Texas
Visit site
✟8,255.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
you can't receive the instrument by which you receive what's granted, until you have the instrument?
I doubt that Ben has the capacity to even see that this one statement has destroyed his ENTIRE argument. Thank you for summing the root of Ben's logical contradiction.

Recognize that all true Christians will be Calvinists in glory....

Your friendly neighborhood Cordial Calvinist
Woody.
 
Upvote 0

Ben johnson

Legend
Site Supporter
Feb 9, 2002
16,916
404
Oklahoma
Visit site
✟99,049.00
Faith
Christian
Rightglory said:
I fully agree with you on almost everything. I also agree that you have clearly shown Reformed theology overturned.
However, in the above statement a key phrase is incorrect.
It is "establishes that a dead-in-sins man can believe and that belief precedes "made alive".
There is no man that is "dead in sins" any longer. That means we would still be under the condemnation of Adam.
Hi, Rightglory! :)

By "dead in sins", it refers to the need for salvation; specifically, as Rom6 asserts, "we are either slaves to sin, or slaves to righteousness --- to God". The only way to "not-be-dead-in-sins", is to be indwelt by the Savior and the Spirit --- through faith.
Christ overturned that condemnation by His resurrection.
Without faith, we are still enslaved to sin, and under condemnation. As Rom8:1 says, "Therefore there is no condemnation for those who are IN CHRIST JESUS..."
He freed mankind from the bondage to death and sin.
From "bondage", technically --- yes. But men are still under bondage if they choose to be (that is, if they choose to reject Jesus).
If Christ is not risen, then we are not saved, if the dead are not raised, then Christ has not risen. I Cor 15:14-19 clearly shows that Christ gave life to mankind.
Conditionally --- He gave life to ALL, but only those WHO receive Him by faith actually receive His life.
If He did not, then even our faith is moot, in vain.
See? "Faith".
Faith does not grant life eternal or immortality.
Faith doesn't; but faith receives Him AND immortality.
Faith places a believer into Christ so we can be joined with Christ. We live IN Him because He lives and restored life to mankind.
He restores life to believers.
But also, your statement, "faith does make man righteous". We are justified by faith. Justified and be made righteous are the same thing. It is because we are justified that we are given all the special Grace given to the elect. Faith initiates it, as well as recieves it.
Agreed --- and eloquently stated.
Vs 5 does not which is why the parentheses around the phrase. All mankind of necessity was made alive otherwise faith or the through faith which follows in vs 8 he adds this phrase because he is refering back to the verses of 7-8 which is referencing believers.
I don't think so --- "made alive", is opposed to "dead in sins". The only way to NOT be dead in sins, is to have forgiveness through Christ.
I don't and don't need to. They are addressing a different aspect of salvation. It is the only place that you fall into the same blunder as Calvinist do. You conflate the Work of Christ on the Cross with the acceptance or man's response to Christ's call to repentance.
You make the response part of the Work of Christ on the Cross. Christ saved not a single individual soul on the Cross. He provided the means, the ability, the capability for man to get back to the purpose for which we were created to be and do with God prior to the fall. It is what man was restored to which he lost due to the fall. Man cannot save himself. How can a dead mortal give life to himself. How can a mortal who is sinful, propitiate his own sins not to say of the whole world. That is why Christ was needed, why He assumed that fallen human nature and by His resurrection raised it to life. It is the meaning and definition of the Incarnation.
Man "saves himself", by virtue of conscious belief and receiving of Jesus' gracious sacrifice. AND, man "saves himself", by conscious diligence IN our faith. That's the only possible understanding of 1Tim4:16.
No, it is actually quite the other way around, First, mankind is reconciled to God, man has nothing to do with it in the least. II Cor 5:18-21 gives you both reconciliations.
I believe you're mis-reading the passage. Verse 17 says "If anyone be IN CHRIST" --- that's referring to saved believers. The statement "reconciling the world", is the same as 1Tim4:10, "God is the Savior of ALL MEN"; it does not deny that "all men" is qualified by "above-all (malista) believers".

There's only one "reconcilliation", it's through Jesus' death sacrifice, by faith.
God reconciled mankind
"provision"...
but now as believers
"fulfillment"...
we have that responsibility to be co-workers with God and pleading vs 20 that you, whomever you are proclaiming the Gospel, be reconciled to God. Vs 1 of 6 continues the same thought.
But man is only reconciled to God IF he believes, has faith...
Exactly.
and remains IN Christ only IF he remains reconciled.
Well, "remains reconciled only if he remains IN Christ".
We remain reconciled by repentance, confession of the sins which is the ONLY thing that can separate man from God.
Sins expose a heart that is not "dwelling in Christ"; thus, sins do not separate us from Christ (nor does sinlessness JOIN us to Christ) --- the fruit, exposes the heart.
It is why believers can become unbelievers, because they permit sin to rule, they lose faith, they become unfaithful and are no longer reconciled to God.
Exactly that.
You are still insisting as the Calvinists do that most of creation is still under Adam and all subject to permanent death. Believing will be moot if that was actually the case, and not just your understanding of the theology. Thus you fail in being perfectly in harmony with the Gospel of Christ.
Those who are not in Christ, are condemned to perishing. Only through faith does one receive eternal life.

And, as Rom1:17 says, it's "BEGINNING faith to ENDING faith; the just shall live BY faith."

:)
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.