So Paul had no opportunity to know the revealed truth!
Logical fallacy. Jesus was not and is not the only way that God reveals truth.
“But now I go away to Him who sent Me, and none of you asks Me, ‘Where are You going?’ 6 But because I have said these things to you, sorrow has filled your heart. 7 Nevertheless I tell you the truth. It is to your advantage that I go away; for if I do not go away, the Helper will not come to you; but if I depart, I will send Him to you. 8 And when He has come, He will convict the world of sin, and of righteousness, and of judgment: 9 of sin, because they do not believe in Me; 10 of righteousness, because I go to My Father and you see Me no more; 11 of judgment, because the ruler of this world is judged.
12 “I still have many things to say to you, but you cannot bear
them now.13 However,
when He, the Spirit of truth, has come, He will guide you into all truth; for He will not speak on His own
authority, but whatever He hears He will speak; and He will tell you things to come. 14 He will glorify Me, for
He will take of what is Mine and declare it to you. 15
All things that the Father has are Mine.
Therefore I said that He will take of Mine and declare it to you."
Paul didn't need to directly hear Jesus' words to His first apostles. He had the Spirit of Truth to guide him.
Even direct communication would not have helped the people who had become blind and deaf for spiritual truths.
Are you arguing with Jesus? It was He who said that He spoke in parables in order that the people would not understand.
It is against the approach Jesus told to correct a person who has gone astray.
That's an outright lie. Hear the words of Jesus:
Moreover
if your brother sins against you, go and tell him his fault between you and him alone. If he hears you, you have gained your brother. 16 But if he will not hear, take with you one or two more, that ‘by the mouth of two or three witnesses every word may be established.’17 And if he refuses to hear them, tell
it to the church. But if he refuses even to hear the church, let him be to you like a heathen and a tax collector.
Undoubtedly, he was not hesitant to tell white lies to push his agenda!
Could you point to these "white lies?"
Peter was speaking of Scripture of the OT and also the writings of Paul. It not correct to equate the two.
Peter equated the two. He said "as they do the
other scriptures..." Tell me, what does "other" mean to you?
Who picked up the books? Where was the need for Jesus to send the Holy Spirit if He could employ Paul to speak on His behalf?
This is yet another non sequitur. It doesn't follow that because God sent the Holy Spirit, He did not also call men to preach the gospel and instruct the believers.