Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
How Republicans Won Phase One Of Impeachment
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Pavel Mosko" data-source="post: 74488871" data-attributes="member: 391518"><p>I will say I've been surprised at what I would call "impeachment atheists" on the board, loving the democrats spin including with ambassador Sondland, which was touted as a quid pro quo victory for the dems etc.</p><p></p><p>I guess what struck me was the compare and contrast between skeptics on topics like "was Jesus or Moses an actual person?" etc. and the facts for this case, (since I was involved in one of those kind of discussions a few days back). In the Sandland testimony when pinned down by his questioning on the "quid pro quo" he specifically stated that "<u>he presumed it"</u>, and earlier mentioned <u>Trump specifically told him to "do the right thing", and there would be no quid pro quo, and Ukraine got the aid anyway etc.</u></p><p><u></u></p><p><u></u></p><p>Needless to say this is not the kind of epistemology I expect from Evidentialists...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Pavel Mosko, post: 74488871, member: 391518"] I will say I've been surprised at what I would call "impeachment atheists" on the board, loving the democrats spin including with ambassador Sondland, which was touted as a quid pro quo victory for the dems etc. I guess what struck me was the compare and contrast between skeptics on topics like "was Jesus or Moses an actual person?" etc. and the facts for this case, (since I was involved in one of those kind of discussions a few days back). In the Sandland testimony when pinned down by his questioning on the "quid pro quo" he specifically stated that "[U]he presumed it"[/U], and earlier mentioned [U]Trump specifically told him to "do the right thing", and there would be no quid pro quo, and Ukraine got the aid anyway etc. [/U] Needless to say this is not the kind of epistemology I expect from Evidentialists... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
How Republicans Won Phase One Of Impeachment
Top
Bottom