What does wine have to do with dinosaurs? If you say the dinosaurs came and went in a literal real 24 hour day, then there is nothing real about anything. In The Fossil Cabin near Medicine Bow, Wyoming there is a building made with dinosaur bones and remains. Do you really think eggs were hatch and they lived and died in a 24 hour period?How old is this wine?
How long does it take for a chicken egg to hatch. If you think a dinosaur egg can hatch, produce a giant dinosaur and vanish all in a day that is crazy. Also, we have ice core samples that indicate hundreds and hundreds of years of climate change. Each layer is like the ring on a tree. WE can count the years. Winter, spring, summer and fall.In what way did I change the rules of time and space?
Embedded age is real. Witnessed age is also real. They are two real perspectives on the concept of the passage of time.At what point does embedded age become real age?
So you think 165 million years of dinosaurs took place in a literal 24 hour day? I have had some wild days, but nothing as wild as that.Embedded age is real.
How can two things be true at the same time? Especially such opposing views? For example, if there is a car accident involving many people, each person will have their own assertion of what "caused" the accident. While they may firmly believe their perspective of events as truth, they can still be wrong, as there would only be one "truth" of what actually happened. While each of the people involved may have correct perspectives in some of the points, there is still one whole truth.I distinguish between these two perspectives of time. The Bible speaks of events that happened in the historical witnessed-time. Scientific research speaks in terms of space-time. Both are real as far as today's people are concerned. In terms of First-Order Logic, they are both true. Both are real depending on your perspective of time. It only proves God's creative power
Can you distinguish between space-time and witnessed-time? If not, then you are right.How can two things be true at the same time?
What makes you think there are two types of time? Regarding the wine example, the Master of the wedding may have said the wine was much older, but he would be wrong, as Jesus had just made it.Can you distinguish between space-time and witnessed-time? If not, then you are right.
Can you quote my words where I said there are two types of time? Please read my OP carefully. If not, then you are right.What makes you think there are two types of time?
Right here, you are literally saying there are two types of time. Space-time and witnessed-time.Can you distinguish between space-time and witnessed-time? If not, then you are right.
And here from your OP.There are two different frameworks of time. Roughly, witnessed-time started when Adam opened his eyes. Space-time is measured by scientific calculations. Even scientifically, there is something funny about time.
I distinguish between these two perspectives of time. The Bible speaks of events that happened in the historical witnessed-time. Scientific research speaks in terms of space-time. Both are real as far as today's people are concerned. In terms of First-Order Logic, they are both true. Both are real depending on your perspective of time. It only proves God's creative power
Thank you for quoting my wordsAnd here from your OP.
The difference is your perspective is subjective and time itself is objective.Thank you for quoting my words
What is the difference between "perspectives of time" and "time"?
Is space-time subjective? Do I by myself determine space-time? Did I invent space-time?The difference is your perspective is subjective and time itself is objective.
No but God did. Thank-you.Is space-time subjective? Do I by myself determine space-time? Did I invent space-time?
Right. So is space-time subjective? Can scientists measure it objectively?No but God did. Thank-you.
I find the flood explains many geological aspects around us except for scouring. How does one explain large rock surfaces that are scoured showing immense forces dragging hard surfaces against each other?The ones you are talking about. Yes of course they are. There no recorded History of them. These things are driven by explaining a billion year old history that didn’t exists not driven by evidence and documentation of the events. There was a flood that covered the entire earth. That is not made up. Recorded event by many sources. Maybe you confuse that with an ice age. The earth was created 6000 years ago. So how could there be an ice age before then unless it’s made up?
How would you explain scouring of large rock surfaces? A flood wouldn't do that. Can anything except glacier movement explain large areas that are scoured showing that a large surface was dragged across the face of another? This could all work in the Gap Theory not requiring evolution.The ones you are talking about. Yes of course they are. There no recorded History of them. These things are driven by explaining a billion year old history that didn’t exists not driven by evidence and documentation of the events. There was a flood that covered the entire earth. That is not made up. Recorded event by many sources. Maybe you confuse that with an ice age. The earth was created 6000 years ago. So how could there be an ice age before then unless it’s made up?
Today's winner.I find the flood explains many geological aspects around us except for scouring. How does one explain large rock surfaces that are scoured showing immense forces dragging hard surfaces against each other?
Unless it can be explained by a form of continental drift.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?