The article on the following link is not only a good basic overview of the Acts 28 Perspective, but also shows how it is that they end up at their odd conclusion Talk about disregarding distinctions within a same passage. One of their top people pits his odd study habits against one of the very best at noting the tiniest distinctions within a passage and comes up wanting - way wanting!
Formerly Mid Acts - NOW ACTS 28: DOES RICHARD JORDAN'S "DID PAUL BREAK HIS WORD?" REALLY REFUTE THE ACTS 28 POSITION?
Those of you on here who are Mid Acts, you'd do yourself good to attempt to lay out for yourselves the consistent mistakes the above Acts 28 author makes in his failure to note various finer distinctions within the passages he so misinterprets...
Danoh
Eph. 4:16
Formerly Mid Acts - NOW ACTS 28: DOES RICHARD JORDAN'S "DID PAUL BREAK HIS WORD?" REALLY REFUTE THE ACTS 28 POSITION?
Those of you on here who are Mid Acts, you'd do yourself good to attempt to lay out for yourselves the consistent mistakes the above Acts 28 author makes in his failure to note various finer distinctions within the passages he so misinterprets...
Danoh
Eph. 4:16
Last edited: