thereselittleflower said:So . . what it all boils down to is that it had nothing to do with the Crusades . . and everything to do with politics outside the purpose of the Crusades .
But I am curious about something you posted . . you said Alexius offered submission of the Eastern Church . . . but to whom did he make that offer? And where do we find record of it?
Peace in Him!
Precisely. Dandolo the doge of Venice and the king of France saw it as an oportunity to make some money on the side before they go to Egypt. Crusading was an expensive business which left many impoverished when they returned. So the thought of fulflilling their religious vows while making some extra cash must have been irresistible. If anyone wants to read a great history of the crusades I suggest any of Professor Jonathan Riley-Smith's books. He is the leading crusade historian living today.
Here is an excerpt of a letter sent by the Pope expressing his dismay to a clergy member who supported the sacking:
How, indeed, is the Greek church to be brought back into ecclesiastical union and to a devotion for the Apostolic See when she has been beset with so many afflictions and persecutions that she sees in the Latins only an example of perdition and the works of darkness, so that she now, and with reason, detests the Latins more than dogs? As for those who were supposed to be seeking the ends of Jesus Christ, not their own ends, whose swords, which they were supposed to use against the pagans, are now dripping with Christian blood * they have spared neither age nor sex. They have committed incest, adultery, and fornication before the eyes of men. They have exposed both matrons and virgins, even those dedicated to God, to the sordid lusts of boys. Not satisfied with breaking open the imperial treasury and plundering the goods of princes and lesser men, they also laid their hands on the treasures of the churches and, what is more serious, on their very possessions. They have even ripped silver plates from the altars and have hacked them to pieces among themselves. They violated the holy places and have carried off crosses and relics. .
countrymousenc said:Ahem! My turn to object, and I think it's only fair. This is a very simplistic and somewhat biased account of the Lutheran Reformation. Perhaps you would be willing to post this in the PRE forum and allow the Lutherans to evaluate.
Well I deliberately tried to keep it simple. Thousands of books have been written on these issues so it would be impossible to cover all the angles in a single post. As for Martin Luther I was giving the Catholic view, as well as the Orthodox view I might add. In their attempt at reform I feel that the protestants had thrown out the baby with the bathwater so to speak, getting rid of 5 sacraments and holy tradition. In 1576 the protestants sent a copy of the augsburg confession to Patriarch Jeremiah in order to gain support for their position. Here is an exerpt of the venerable patriarch's response:
You reckon the invocation of the saints, their icons, and their sacred relics as futile. You reject their veneration, taking as a pretext the Hebrew source. Moreover, you also reject confession to one another. In addition, you reject the angelic, monastic life. And about these matters we say that the Holy [Scripture] passages concerning them have not been interpreted by such theologians as you are, for neither Saint Chrysostom nor any other of the blessed and true theologians interpreted as if they were dragged along by a torrent. But, indeed, he [Chrysostom] and the holy man after him, being full of the Holy Spirit who performed supernatural miracles while they were living and after they died, interpreted [the Holy Scriptures] as they did; and they received such traditions, and they handed them down successively and gave them to us as indispensable and pious [sacraments]. Some of these even Old Rome also keeps and acquiesces with us. From whence have you reckoned better than Old and New Rome? Indeed, have you forsaken the interpretations of the true theologians and considered your own as more preferable? From the source of the Hebrew tradition we learn from history that contempt for the holy icons and sacred relics had its origin from the Hebrews. The schisms of the Lutherans there, which are many and various, were indeed caused and spread by some Hebrews, as it has been broached abroad feigning piety. And already, as you see, they have taken root and have opened the way for more evil as day by day they grow worse. Being completely not in communion with them [the Hebrews], we covet and, indeed, unshakably, the sacraments of our Church. We closely adhere to the teachings which have been uttered by the successors of the God-preaching Holy Apostles. We consider their interpretations as more precious than all the gold and gems. Indeed, we invoke the all-holy saints not as saviors and redeemers, God forbid, for only One is the Savior and Redeemer, the Christ; but we who are sinners and in the midst of evils hold them forth as intermediaries who have completed the journey of life in a holy and satisfactory manner and have departed to God, and who richly intercede for us. And of course, we are not committing sin by continually pursuing this aim. For by venerating their holy icons and their relics which cause thousands of healings to those who on occasion approach in faith, we reap extraordinary beneficences from them, and we are illumined in soul and body. We confess also to one another, according to the Holy Scriptures. We revere the monastic and angelic life. We pray that those who lift up these burdens do not turn back at all, if indeed they would choose to be properly prepared for the kingdom of heaven.
Therefore, we request that from henceforth you do not cause us more grief, nor write to us on the same subject if you should wish to treat these luminaries and theologians of the Church in a different manner. You honor and exalt them in words, but you reject them in deeds. For you try to prove our weapons which are their holy and divine discourses as unsuitable. And it is with these documents that we would have to write and contradict you. Thus, as for you, please release us from these cares. Therefore, going about your own ways, write no longer concerning dogmas; but if you do, write only for friendship's sake. Farewell.
Jeremiah, Patriarch of Constantinople
Issued in the year 1581, June 6
Protonotarios Theodosios
Upvote
0