JonFromMinnesota
Well-Known Member
You claimed science made a mistake in the theory of evolution and flying squirrels were an example. What is the mistake? Elaborate.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I give up ... how?
That wasn't what I was addressing anyway.
I always like it when people bring up the "fact" that we should all have one less rib, since God took one of Adam's to make Eve.Depends on what view of evolution you're referring to.
I always like it when people bring up the "fact" that we should all have one less rib, since God took one of Adam's to make Eve.
I like bringing up Lamarckism and then watch them go to read-only mode.
No, I didn't.You claimed science made a mistake in the theory of evolution ...
What mistake exactly did evolutionary biologists make?
Flying squirrels.
Show me where it's wrong?
Um....just yesterday you were telling me that the TOE says we should be able to watch a dog mutate into a fish before our eyes. You'll have to excuse me, but I don't believe you have a clue about what you're talking about now.
Quote me.
My bad, you didn't say that, Truthseeker did. But you then supported his statement. Thread is "What is the postive evidence FOR Creationism", post#672. IMO If you're supporting a statement, you agree with it.You ever find that quote?
My bad, you didn't say that, Truthseeker did. But you then supported his statement. Thread is "What is the postive evidence FOR Creationism", post#672. IMO If you're supporting a statement, you agree with it.
Ok, thanks for the correction.
No worries. What I should have said is: "You support the belief that the TOE says we should be able to watch a dog morph into a fish right before our eyes." My apologies.
Natural Selection doesn't break any laws. It is a Law of Nature in itself.
Wow. How unbelievably false a claim.
Where are you getting your understanding about natural selection???
Wrong. You are the one that has no understanding of this topic. You claim to want to learn. You can't declare how this problem is to be attacked.No, the attempt at changing the issue isn't going to work. The issue is the HOW/process which is proposed by the faith-based, pseudo-science guesses and suppositions of Darwinism.
And I asked the simple question where and you couldn't point it out.
Ok. You're the one making disparaging personal remarks against me and Christians.
Right now the issue is your complete lack of evidence based on the scientific method.
The law of Biogenetics. Laws of Physics
Natural Selection doesn't break any laws. It is a Law of Nature in itself.
No, I'm not. Evolution needs mutation to be a viable theory, which is a chaotic process, so there should be a ton of fossils of the mutations which did not succeed, demanded by statistics because we have many fossils of single animals, but no fossil record of the billions of mutations which did not succeed.
Wrong. You are the one that has no understanding of this topic. You claim to want to learn. You can't declare how this problem is to be attacked.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?