How much longer?

[Subduction Zone]

I can declare the problem. And the problem is insurmountable for the Darwinist evolutionary view.

I doubt it but go ahead.

Are you ready to restart your evidence education yet?

 

[justlookinla]

No need.



Where? And it seems that you once again made the mistake of thinking that all Christians are creationists. Most creationists accept the fact that life evolved.



Wrong again. Where were we in the lesson? Were you able to learn anything yet?

We were at the point we've been at for months. You've not provided evidence to be subjected to the scientific method. I've tried to be as simple as possible to help you understand the scientific method even to the point of posting a picture. Until you provide the evidence, I can't help you understand the most simple of concepts.

 

[Subduction Zone]

We were at the point we've been at for months. You've not provided evidence to be subjected to the scientific method. I've tried to be as simple as possible to help you understand the scientific method even to the point of posting a picture. Until you provide the evidence, I can't help you understand the most simple of concepts.

That is because you don't have a clue about the scientific method. I am trying to remedy that by teaching you what scientific evidence is. We aren't there yet. Right now we are discussing empirical evidence. Do you realize yet that a fossil found and identified in a particular stratum is a piece of empirical evidence yet?

 

[JonFromMinnesota]

You've not provided evidence to be subjected to the scientific method. I've tried to be as simple as possible to help you understand the scientific method even to the point of posting a picture. Until you provide the evidence, I can't help you understand the most simple of concepts.

So much evidence has been provided to you that derived from the use of the scientific method. You don't understand the scientific method. I have not seen one post where you demonstrate what it means and how it works. Posting an image is not demonstrating you know how it works. The only thing i've observed you do is play pigeon chess.

 

[justlookinla]

That is because you don't have a clue about the scientific method.

Sure I do. I've even tried to make it as simple as possible for you to understand. A visual usually helps one understand...I can post it again if you wish.

I am trying to remedy that by teaching you what scientific evidence is. We aren't there yet. Right now we are discussing empirical evidence. Do you realize yet that a fossil found and identified in a particular stratum is a piece of empirical evidence yet?

Do you realize that a fossil doesn't offer the HOW, the process, claimed by Darwinist evolution which can be subjected to the scientific method to see if it's valid or not?

 

[justlookinla]

So much evidence has been provided to you that derived from the use of the scientific method.

Reference please.

You don't understand the scientific method.

Sure I do. I've posted graphics in an attempt to make it simple for you.

I have not seen one post where you demonstrate what it means and how it works. Posting an image is not demonstrating you know how it works. The only thing i've observed you do is play pigeon chess.

Posting the image is to help you, I understand the process depicted in the image. You've not given evidence to be subjected to that scientific process and you're not or you'd have posted it by now.

 

[Subduction Zone]

So much evidence has been provided to you that derived from the use of the scientific method. You don't understand the scientific method. I have not seen one post where you demonstrate what it means and how it works. Posting an image is not demonstrating you know how it works. The only thing i've observed you do is play pigeon chess.

Yup, I got tired of giving him evidence long ago. He would demonstrate that he does not know what evidence is by constantly denying it. The problem for him is that if he learns what evidence is the only way he will be able to deny it in the future would be to openly lie. He does not want to be caught in an open and obvious lie, it seems that he is keeping himself ignorant on purpose.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Sure I do. I've even tried to make it as simple as possible for you to understand. A visual usually helps one understand...I can post it again if you wish.

Sorry, but this is a terrible error on your part. You do not even understand evidence and it is impossible to understand the scientific method if you do not understand the nature of evidence.

Do you realize that a fossil doesn't offer the HOW, the process, claimed by Darwinist evolution which can be subjected to the scientific method to see if it's valid or not?

It does not need to. Once again, we do not need to know the "HOW" to know that life evolved. Do you need to know how a bullet fires to shoot a gun? The topic is evidence. Let's see if there is even one honest bone in your body.


Do you realize yet that a fossil found and identified in a particular stratum is a piece of empirical evidence yet?

 

[justlookinla]

Yup, I got tired of giving him evidence long ago.

You've never given evidence. You can't reference one single post where you gave evidence.

He would demonstrate that he does not know what evidence is by constantly denying it.

You've offered no evidence to deny.

The problem for him is that if he learns what evidence is the only way he will be able to deny

Evidence is what you've not offered.

it in the future would be to openly lie. He does not want to be caught in an open and obvious lie, it seems that he is keeping himself ignorant on purpose.

Seems you're making your usual invisible evidence claims. The fact is, you can't reference one single post where you've offered this evidence.

 

[Subduction Zone]

You've never given evidence. You can't reference one single post where you gave evidence.



You've offered no evidence to deny.



Evidence is what you've not offered.



Seems you're making your usual invisible evidence claims. The fact is, you can't reference one single post where you've offered this evidence.

This is goading again. Please don't make false claims about me.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Do you realize yet that a fossil found and identified in a particular stratum is a piece of empirical evidence yet?

 

[justlookinla]

Sorry, but this is a terrible error on your part. You do not even understand evidence and it is impossible to understand the scientific method if you do not understand the nature of evidence.

It's impossible to subject evidence to the scientific method when you've offered absolutely no evidence.

It does not need to. Once again, we do not need to know the "HOW" to know that life evolved.

You've claimed you have evidence for the HOW, the process which produced pine trees and humans from an alleged single life form of long ago. You, of course, don't have that, never had it and will never have it because it doesn't exist.

Do you need to know how a bullet fires to shoot a gun? The topic is evidence. Let's see if there is even one honest bone in your body.

Evidence for what?

Do you realize yet that a fossil found and identified in a particular stratum is a piece of empirical evidence yet?

You don't realize that the location of a fossil isn't evidence for the HOW, the process, which produced pine trees and humans from an alleged single life form (unknown) of long ago. That's a core reason for your confusion.

 

[justlookinla]

This is goading again. Please don't make false claims about me.

No, it's not goading. You've made a claim you've offered evidence. Reference where you've offered it. Support your claim. Prove it.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Wrong justlookin, more false charges:

Do you realize yet that a fossil found and identified in a particular stratum is a piece of empirical evidence yet?

 

[justlookinla]

Do you realize yet that a fossil found and identified in a particular stratum is a piece of empirical evidence yet?

Do you realize that fossil location doesn't address the HOW, the process, which produced pine trees and humans from an alleged single life form (unknown) of long ago?

 

[Subduction Zone]

No, it's not goading. You've made a claim you've offered evidence. Reference where you've offered it. Support your claim. Prove it.

Nope it was goading. You made several false claims against me. I am not about to scan my complete record for you.

Do you realize yet that a fossil found and identified in a particular stratum is a piece of empirical evidence yet?

 

[Subduction Zone]

Do you realize that fossil location doesn't address the HOW, the process, which produced pine trees and humans from an alleged single life form (unknown) of long ago?

Wrong.

Do you realize yet that a fossil found and identified in a particular stratum is a piece of empirical evidence yet?

 

[Subduction Zone]

Do you realize that fossil location doesn't address the HOW, the process, which produced pine trees and humans from an alleged single life form (unknown) of long ago?

Wrong:

Do you realize yet that a fossil found and identified in a particular stratum is a piece of empirical evidence yet?

 

[justlookinla]

Nope it was goading. You made several false claims against me. I am not about to scan my complete record for you.

What false claim? Reference it. Asking you to prove what you say isn't goading. You not proving what you say is evasion though.

Do you realize yet that a fossil found and identified in a particular stratum is a piece of empirical evidence yet?

Do you realize that fossil location doesn't address the HOW, the process, which produced pine trees and humans from an alleged single life form (unknown) of long ago?

 

[justlookinla]

Wrong:

Do you realize yet that a fossil found and identified in a particular stratum is a piece of empirical evidence yet?

Do you realize that fossil location doesn't address the HOW, the process, which produced pine trees and humans from an alleged single life form (unknown) of long ago?