How many ways would you read Revelationary ___ as a textbook ___ of ___ ___ forgotten time

[Gottservant]

Hi there,

So, unfortunately ____ I don't believe that Revelationary can be understood, as anything more than a reiteration of the possibility that a disconnect between might be as permanent as the separation of Heaven and Earth necessitates ____. In other words ___ not interpreted as at least more and more need for interpretation ___ ___ it is actually a greater reunification of the problem of the need to remember Lot's wife ___ as against ___ than can ever be justified ____ ____ ____.

Qualified correctly ____ this is the problem of everything turning to mud ___ when denied blood ____ and perpetually greater and greater resolution to make less of time ___ no matter how great the consequence for a lesser desired "mate" (as if ___ water ___ is ___ not ____ ____ ____ ____).

Mirrored with less anticipation ____ as ongoing ____ ____ - the problem is perpetually more violence ____ to anyone who does not recognize that the children are forever the wife's problem ____ until spoken to ____ on the authority of the name given ____ as "Father" (but ___ not ever ___ li- - - -ke___ a-son).

 

[jacknife]

I dont understand do i fill in the blanks?

 

[Gottservant]

The underlines are to accentuate that the intended meaning of the unqualified irony ____ is not undisqualifiable (as and when ____ ____ desired ____ ____ ____ ____).

Functionally, you are meant to supplant your own logue, until the necessary clash of iron is requested ____.

(no further ____ ____ informatively ____ ____ expected).