Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
No, they interpret it the only way that makes any logical sense.
Yes and it still is unanimous within the Scientific Community. It is only in specific religious communities that anyone takes the global flood the least bit seriously. You can read the history of the Collapse of Flood Geology and a Young Earth by evangelical Christian geologists Davis Young for details.Was this falsification unanimous within the scientific community?
Please, the moon dust nonsense was refuted long ago...
BTW if the moon were only 10,000 years old the amount of "moon dust" would be so thin that it would be hard to measure at all.
The only "flood believers" who are trained as scientists believe in the flood for religious reasons and not because of science. There was a challenge on this board at one time to find a single geologist who accepted the global flood because of scientific evidence and not because of their religious indoctrination and it proved impossible.Then I take it, if it has so much logical sense behind it, it is unanimous within the scientific community?
I don't believe Jesus literally was a sheep, so following your line of logic how can I know anything is true if I believe Jesus isn't literally a sheep?
The first calculations were made based on inaccurate earth based observations, more accurate space based measurements showed they were in error. So what? Science marches on, creationism marches backwards.No kidding --- that's my point.
If scientists' calculations were correct, Neil Armstrong should have been plodding through several feet of moondust.
The only "flood believers" who are trained as scientists believe in the flood for religious reasons and not because of science. There was a challenge on this board at one time to find a single geologist who accepted the global flood because of scientific evidence and not because of their religious indoctrination and it proved impossible.
Yes and it still is unanimous within the Scientific Community.
I see that you can't handle the fact that the only people trained in science who accept the global flood do so because of religious indoctrination but it is a fact.Are you going to answer my question or not, FB?
If you want to play games, I don't have time for it.
Once agian, is it unanimous within the scientific community --- yes or no, please.
I don't need a paragraph and a dance.
So find a geologist who accepts the global flood because of scientific evidence and not religious belief. Even Kurt Wise has stated that no such geologist exists.I don't believe you.
I see that you can't handle the fact that the only people trained in science who accept the global flood do so because of religious indoctrination but it is a fact.
So find a geologist who accepts the global flood because of scientific evidence and not religious belief. Even Kurt Wise has stated that no such geologist exists.
You don't need to be a geologist to see that the global flood makes no sense. However, the more science you study the more you realize that the global flood not only makes no sense, it is totally, absolutely and irredeemably absurd.Well, if it makes "so much sense", as you say it does, why do they need training at all?
You don't need to be a geologist to see that the global flood makes no sense. However, the more science you study the more you realize that the global flood not only makes no sense, it is totally, absolutely and irredeemably absurd.
Nonsense. You just have to have a brain that hasn't had all capability for logical thought washed out by religious indoctrination.I'll agree there --- you have to study science (id est, be brainwashed) --- to believe the Flood makes no sense.
Nonsense. You just have to have a brain that hasn't had all capability for logical thought washed out by religious indoctrination.
Indeed! You have to do some pretty complicated explaining if you want to carry on believing in a global flood despite the overwhelming evidence against it!Nonsense. You just have to have a brain that hasn't had all capability for logical thought washed out by religious indoctrination.
Indeed! You have to do some pretty complicated explaining if you want to carry on believing in a global flood despite the overwhelming evidence against it!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?